Bocchiaro Experiment Flashcards

1
Q

How many participants obeyed

A

76.5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Another piece of quantitative data from the experiment

A

the ‘comparison’ group thought they were most likely to blow the whistle - 64.5% compared with 31.9% who though they would just disobey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the conclusions from the experiment

A

What people they will do is quite different from what they actually do. This belief that they are ‘better than the average’ may make them blind to social pressures adn thus vulnerable to them

Situational rather than dispositional factors may offer a better explanation for disobedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many men and women were in the experiment

A

96 women and 53 men

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many people disobeyed in the experiment

A

14.1%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How many people ‘blew the whistle’

A

9.4%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the ethical issue in this experiment

A

Deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Particapnts

A

149 undergraduate students from VU univiesty in amsertadman.

96 females and 53 males

  • Flyers around the uni
  • All ppts were paid euros or given course credit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does it stick to ethics

A

ppts told what the study was oab

-Told they could withdrawl

  • Info was confindetinal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the 2 tasks ppts were told to do in the second room.

A

HEXACO PIR

and

decomposed games measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the conclusions from the study

A

Situational rather than dispotiaonl factors may offer a better explantion for disobdeince.

students overestimated the tendency to whistle-blow and underestimate likelihood of obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

aim

A

To investigate the rates of obedience, disobedience and whistle-blowing in a situation where no physical violence was involved
- investigate accuracy of people’s estimates of obedience, disobedience and whistle-blowing
- investigate role of dispositional factors in obedience, disobedience and whistle-blowing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Participants

A

149 undergraduate students
- 96 females, 53 males
- recruited flyers around Uni of Amsterdam
- all p’s were paid euros or given course credit for taking part in study
- 92 p’s took part in pilot study
- 11 p’s removed because of the suspiciousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly