biopsychology Flashcards
what is the nervous system made up of?
brain and spinal cord
what is the peripheral nervous system made up of?
relays messages from the environment to the CNS, via sensory neurones, and from the CNS to effectors, via motor neurones.
what is the peripheral nervous system further subdivided into?
the autonomic nervous system and the somatic nervous system
what does the autonomic nervous system do?
it controls involuntary, vital functions of the body such as maintaining heart and breathing rates.
what does the somatic nervous system do?
it receives information from sensory receptors belonging to each of the 5 senses and results in effectors being stimulated in the CNS via: motor neurones
what is the autonomic system divided into and how do they work together?
the sympathetic and parasympathetic
these branches work as an antagonistic pair
sympathetic nervous systems job
increased heart and breathing rate.
causes vasodilation and pupil constriction
endocrines systems job
it sends chemical messages around the body
its where hormones are secreted into the blood stream and then are transported towards target cells in the blood, with complementary receptors.
why is the pituitary gland considered?
the ‘master gland’ because it controls the release of hormones from all other glands in the body.
what does the adrenal gland release?
adrenaline (fight or flight)
what is the fight or flight response
1.The body senses and becomes aware of a stressor in the environment e.g. the sound of a speeding car.
2.Through sensory receptors and sensory neurones in the PNS, this information is sent to the hypothalamus in the brain which coordinates a response and triggers increased levels of activity in the sympathetic branch of the ANS.
3.Adrenaline is released from the adrenal medulla in the adrenal glands, and is transported to target effectors, via the blood and through the
action of the endocrine system.
what is synaptic transmission?
is a method of neurons communicating with each other, relaying information to the CNS across sensory neurons and carrying out responses dictated by the brain through sending information to effectors via motor neurons.
describe the process of synaptic transmission:
- An action potential arrives at the presynaptic membrane, causing depolarisation through the opening of voltage-dependent calcium ion channels, and the consequent influx of calcium ions.
2.The increased concentration of calcium ions within the membrane causes the vesicles, containing
neurotransmitter, to fuse with the presynaptic membrane and release their contents into the synaptic cleft through exocytosis. - The neurotransmitter diffuses across the synaptic cleft, down a concentration gradient, and binds to complementary receptors on the post-synaptic membrane. This can result in an inhibitory or excitatory effect in the postsynaptic membrane.
- The resultant action potential will then be transmitted along the axon of the following neuron, resulting in a ‘cascade’ of neurotransmission!
what’s the difference between inhibitory and excitatory transmitters?
-Neurotransmitters can either have an inhibitory or excitatory effect. Inhibitory neurotransmitters (e.g. serotonin) reduce the potential difference across the postsynaptic membrane through the closure of the voltage-dependent sodium ion channels, reducing the likelihood that an action potential will be generated.
- Excitatory neurotransmitters (e.g. dopamine) increase the potential difference across the postsynaptic membrane through triggering the opening of more voltage-dependent sodium ion channels, increasing the likelihood that an action potential will be generated.
what is localisation of the brain?
localisation of the brain suggests that specific areas are responsible for certain processes
what are the different localised areas?
motor area
auditory area
visual area
somatosensory area
describe the Motor area
-found in frontal lobe
-this area is involved in regulating and coordinating movements.
-Lesions or damage in the motor area result in an inability to control voluntary fine motor movements.
describe the auditory area
-located on the superior temporal gyrus
-is responsible for processing auditory information and speech.
-Lesions or damage in the auditory area causes hearing loss,
-damage to specific parts of the auditory area (Wernicke’s area) results in Wernicke’s aphasia.
describe the visual area
An area in the occipital lobe which is responsible for processing visual information.
describe the somatosensory area
-An area of the parietal lobe
-it processes information associated with
the senses e.g. touch, heat, pressure etc. 1“These regions receive neuronal input from specific nuclei of the thalamus that correspond with the handling of sensation along the lines of touch, pain, temperature and limb position”.
-Lesions in this area result in a loss of ability to denote sensitivity to particular bodily areas.
describe wernickes area
-Responsible for speech comprehension and located in the temporal lobe (the left temporal lobe for most people).
-Lesions or damage (e.g. through stroke and trauma) results in Wernicke’s aphasia, which is characterised by the use of nonsensical words (called syllogisms), no awareness of using incorrect words, but no issues with pronounciation and intonation.
describe brocas area
-Responsible for speech production
-Located in the frontal lobe, usually in the left hemisphere.
-Lesions or damage results in Broca’s aphasia, characterised by difficulty forming complete sentences and understanding sentences, as well as failing to understand the order of words in a sentence and who they are directed towards i.e. I, you, we, him, me etc.
support for localisation of brain function
+ Supporting evidence for localisation of brain function = Tulving et al demonstrated, using PET scans, that semantic memories were recalled from the left prefrontal cortex, whilst episodic memories were recalled from the right prefrontal cortex. This shows that different areas of the brain are responsible for different functions, as predicted by localisation theory. This idea was further supported by Petersen et al (1988) , who found that Wernicke’s area activation is required for listening tasks, whereas Broca’s area is required for reading tasks. This confirms the idea that Wernicke’s area is involved in speech comprehension, whilst Broca’s area is responsible for speech production.
+ Supporting Case Studies = Phineas Gage was injured by a blasting rod which intersected the left side of his face, tearing through his prefrontal cortex. 2“The damage involved both left and right prefrontal cortices in a pattern that, as confirmed by Gage’s modern counterparts, causes a defect in rational decision making and the processing of emotion”. Such case studies, particularly those showing marked differences after trauma, demonstrate the idea that some areas of the brain are responsible for specific functions. However, with the use of case studies, the subjectivity of the conclusions drawn and the unusual sample, alongside a lack of control over confounding and extraneous variables, must also be considered.
+ Supporting evidence for localisation of brain function = Tulving et al demonstrated, using PET scans, that semantic memories were recalled from the left prefrontal cortex, whilst episodic memories were recalled from the right prefrontal cortex. This shows that different areas of the brain are responsible for different functions, as predicted by localisation theory. This idea was further supported by Petersen et al (1988) , who found that Wernicke’s area activation is required for listening tasks, whereas Broca’s area is required for reading tasks. This confirms the idea that Wernicke’s area is involved in speech comprehension, whilst Broca’s area is responsible for speech production.
+ Supporting Case Studies = Phineas Gage was injured by a blasting rod which intersected the left side of his face, tearing through his prefrontal cortex. 2“The damage involved both left and right prefrontal cortices in a pattern that, as confirmed by Gage’s modern counterparts, causes a defect in rational decision making and the processing of emotion”. Such case studies, particularly those showing marked differences after trauma, demonstrate the idea that some areas of the brain are responsible for specific functions. However, with the use of case studies, the subjectivity of the conclusions drawn and the unusual sample, alongside a lack of control over confounding and extraneous variables, must also be considered.
weakness to localisation of brain function
— Contradictory Theory = The opposite to localisation theory would be a holistic view of brain function, suggesting that each function requires several brain areas to be activated and that these functions are not restricted to these areas. For example, after removing 20-50% of the cortices belonging to rats, found that no specific brain area or lesion was associated with learning how to traverse through a maze. This suggests that intelligence, or even learning, is too complex and advanced a cognitive ability to be restricted to certain areas of the brain. Therefore, this suggests that localisation theory may provide a better explanation for ‘simple’, rather than complex, brain functions.