attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is attachment?

A

Attachment is an affectional tie that one person or animal forms between himself and another specific one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Behaviours that indicate attachment (maccoby)

A

-proximity seeking
-separation distress and pleasure when reunited
-general orientation towards specific individual
-joy on reunion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interactional synchrony

A

Is where an infant mirrors the actions of another person eg: facial expressions and body movements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Meltzoff and Moore study

A

Found that infants as young as 2 or 3 weeks old imitated specific facial and hand gestures.
The study was conducted with an adult model who displayed 1 of 3 facial expressions.
A dummy was placed in infants mouth to prevent response.
Following the display the dummy was removed and the child’s expression was filmed.
An association between the child’s behaviour and the adults one was found.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reciprocity

A

Interactions between carers and infants result in mutual behaviour where both parties are able to produce responses from eachother.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Feldman and eildelmans discover on “alert phases”

A

Babies have periodic alert phases and signal they are ready for interaction.
Mothers pick this up around 2/3 of the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluation of care giver interactions

A

-a strength of observation into caregiver interactions is that they use well-controlled procedures with both the mother and infant being filmed.
-a weakness of observing infant interactions is that it is difficult to know what they mean by these interactions.
-a weakness of research is that it could be considered unethical as it is socially sensitive
-a weakness of observations is that they don’t tell us the purpose of synchrony and reciprocity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the stages of attachment?

A

asocial
indiscriminate
specific
multiple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did grossman conduct into the father’s role in child’s development?

A

he conducted a longitudinal study of 44 families comparing the role of fathers and mothers to the child’s attachment experiences at 6/10 and 16.
He found that father’s play style ( sensitive/ challenging and interactive) was a better predictor of the child’s long term attachment than the early measures of attachment type that the infant had with their father.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did field find in his study on fathers as primary caregivers?

A

Field filmed 4 month old babies face to face interaction with their parents in 3 different situations:
-mothers (primary)
-fathers (primary)
fathers (secondary)
Primary caregiver fathers spent more time smiling, imitating and holding infants compared to secondary caregivers. This behaviour appears to be more important in building attachment with the infant. Therefore fathers can be more nitiding. Key to attachment is level of responsiveness NOT the gender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Factors influencing the father- child attachment:

A

Degree of sensitivity
Type of attachment with own parents
Marital intimacy
Supportive co-parenting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluation of father as primary caregiver studies

A

A weakness of research is the inconsistent findings on the role of fathers in attachment due to researchers being intrested in different research questions
A weakness it doesn’t explain why children without fathers develop no differently
A limitation is that there are numerous influence which might impact on a child emotional development
A weakness of research is that it doesn’t explain why fathers don’t generally become primary attachment figures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lorenz animal study Aim, procedure, findings and conclusion:

A

Aim: to understand imprinting on geese
Procedure: 2 lots of geese eggs divided into 2 groups
-1 w/ mother
-1 in an incubator and saw Lorenz first and followed him around.
Findings: when put back together they divided into 2 groups again
-imprinting restricted to critical period
-imprinting is reversible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

John bowlbys theory on the critical period of developing an attachment

A

He theorised that there is a critical period for developing attachment of (0-5 years). If an attachment has not been developed during this period the child will suffer from irreversible developmental consequences, such as reduced intelligence and increased aggression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lorenz evaluation

A

Problems with generalising birds to humans
Support for imprinting: guiton found that chicks could imprint on an inflated yellow glove. Found that it could be reversed by spending time with own species.
Lorenz: saw a peacocks first moving object was a tortoise and imprinted on it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Harlows animal study: aim, procedure, findings and conclusions

A

Aim: to understand the defect of affection within attachment
Procedure: a monkey was given two conditions a wire and cloth monkey that both fed it
Findings: monkey went to cloth mother in anxiety induced situations (provided contact comfort£
and led to be bad parental monkeys and had bad social skills in adolescence.
Conclusion: affection has a large impact on child’s development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Evaluation for Lorenz and Harlow

A

Lorenz and Harlow: lacks generalisability to humans

Psychologists have questioned whether imprinting has a long lasting effect on later mating behaviour.

Harlow: supports importance of primary caregiver and infant attachments

Harlow: has practical value as it helped social workers w/ child neglect and abuse.

Harlow: unethical causes distress to monkey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Learning theory for attachment: classical conditioning

A

Food -> happy baby
mother + food -> happy baby
mother -> happy baby

Behaviour is learnt through association .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Learning theory for attachment: operant conditioning

A

Infant hungry. Motivated to reduce discomfort.
Feeding reduces discomfort and produces feeling of pleasure
Food becomes a primary reinforcer. Reinforces the behaviour to avoid discomfort.
The person who supplies the food is associated with avoiding discomfort (secondary reinforcer)
The child seeks the person who can give the reward and so becomes attached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Evaluation for learning theor

A

Schaffer and Emerson found that the best attachments were with parents that paid the most attention to the baby not who fed them the most
Harlows research proved that babies form better attachment with adults that provide comfort not food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Bowlbys attachment theory

A

MONO TROPIC THEORY: the idea that infants have an inbuilt tendency to make an initial attachment with one attachment figure called primary caregiver, usually the mother
INTERNAL WORKING MODEL: based on experiences of attachment the infant will develop a model about emotional relationships. Bowlby called this the internal working model. A cluster of concepts about what to expect from others.
SOCIAL RELEASERS: innate, infant social behaviours that stimulate adult interaction and caregiving.
CRITICAL PERIODS: limited window for attachment to happen- 6-18 months sensitive period. After that it becomes increasingly difficult for attachment to happen.

22
Q

Evaluation of bowlbys theory of attachment:

A

Lorenz supports the evolutionary approach as his geese imprinted on the first thing they saw to be kept safe.

Schaffer and Emmerson. Children show many attachments, but one primary attachment. Observed that mothers who responded to infants demands and more interaction have a stronger attachment.

Minnesota Longitudinal Study. Followed from infancy to adolescence. Found continuity between early attachment to later behavioral and emotional behaviour

Rutter et al (1998) contradicts Bowlby’s idea of a critical period as it shows adoptees can form attachment after their first birthday. Can form attachment after critical period. Therefore, it is suggested critical period should be called sensitive period as attachments are quicker formed then but can still be formed after this period; just takes longer

Bowlby’s theory cannot explain how some children suffer the long term consequences of not being able to form attachment while other children don’t as they are able to cope with poor attachment experiences
Schaffer and Emmerson found that children form many attachments

23
Q

The strange situation aim and procedure

A

Aim: to investigate how infants (9-18 months) behave under conditions of mild stress and novelty.
Procedure: stress and separation created by the presence of a stranger and separation from a caregiver testing stranger anxiety and separation anxiety, willingness to explore and reunion behaviour.
Data is recorded by time sampling every 15 seconds.

24
Q

Strange situation steps:

A

1) mum and baby play
2) strangers enters and interacts with baby
3) mum leaves and stranger tries to comfort baby
4) mum returns, comforts baby, stranger leaves
5)mum leaves again
6) stranger returns, comforts baby
7) mum returns

25
Q

Secure attachment types reaction to
1)willingness to explore
2)stranger anxiety
3) separation anxiety
4)reunion behaviour
5)percentage

A

1)high
2)high
3)some easy to soothe
4) enthusiastic
5) 66%

26
Q

Insecure-avoidant attachment types reaction to
1)willingness to explore
2)stranger anxiety
3) separation anxiety
4)reunion behaviour
5)percentage

A

1) high
2)low
3) indifferent
4) avoids contact
5) 22%

27
Q

Insecure-resistant attachment types reaction to
1)willingness to explore
2)stranger anxiety
3) separation anxiety
4)reunion behaviour
5)percentage

A

1)low
2) high
3) distressed
4) seeks and rejects
5) 12%

28
Q

Evaluation of the strange situation:
PERVERT

A

PRACTICAL ISSUES: main and solo man found an additional attachment type- insecure disorganised
ETHICAL ISSUES: no as it is in a real life setting and so doesn’t cause any more distress than would be expected irl
RELIABILITY: main er al found that all identified before 18 months of age were still securely attached at 6 years
VALIDITY: ecological validity, found that attachment behaviour is much stronger in a lab than at home
ETHNOCENTRICITY: N/A
REPRESENTATIVITY: all middle class white kids
THEORETICAL ISSUES: bowlbys theory

29
Q

Evaluating effects of attachment type: prior & glaser

A

secure attachment = positive outcomes
(Less emotional dependence, higher achievements)
Avoidant attachment= later aggressiveness and generally negative effect.
Resistant attachment: greater anxiety and withdrawn behaviour

Shows this study is reliable as it has consistent results over time

30
Q

Evaluation effects of attachment type: hazen and shaver

A

Used the love quiz to show that attachment type was associated with later romantic behaviour.

Self report technique -> bias
-> memory loss

31
Q

evaluation of factors influencing attachment type: Ainsworth (sensitivity)

A

mothers of securely attached infants= more sensitive, accepting, responsive and accessible.
mothers of insecurely attached infants= unresponsive to being crying and less affectionate
mothers of avoidant infants= more rejecting, paid less attention to infants when entering the room

MOTHERS BEHAVIOUR CAUSES ATTACHMENT TYPE: NURTURE.

32
Q

evaluation of factors influencing attachment type: temperament

A

if a baby has a naturally bad temperament, this will In turn influence how the mother responds to them, which will influence the type of attachment they have.
children w/ difficult temperaments may be more prone to upset around change so could appear insecurely attached despite having a secure attachment with their mother.
THE TEMPERAMENT F CHILD AFFECTS THE BEHAVIOUR OF INFANT: NATURE

33
Q

what is an individualist culture and give an example?

A

They value independence and the importance of the individual.
Western countries such as the UK and America are classed as Individualist.

34
Q

what is a collectivist culture and give an example?

A

A collectivist culture emphasises the importance of the group or collective.
Japan and Israel are examples pf those cultures

35
Q

van ljzendoorn and kroonenburg meta analysis using ainsworths strange situation general findings

A

A bond develops between infant and one primary attachment figure

Regardless of cultural differences
secure attachment Is the norm across the world.

36
Q

What are the flaws to looking at cross- cultural similarities and cross-cultural differences?

A

rothbaum et al argued that the attachment theory isn’t relevant because it is so rooted in American culture
-the sensitivity hypothesis- rothbaum argued that it reflected western ideas o autonomy
-the continuity hypothesis- competence isn’t defined in the same way in eastern cultures.
-secure base hypothesis- dependence orientated relationships are valued

37
Q

bowlbys maternal deprivation theory

A

a continual disruptions of the attachment between infant and primary caregiver could result in a long-term cognitive social and emotional difficulties for that infant

38
Q

What does long-term separation lead to?

A

Delinquency, reduced intelligence, increased aggression, depression, and affectionate psychopathy

39
Q

What was Bowlby’s 44 thieves study? aim

A

Aim: to investigate the long-term effects of maternal deprivation on people in order to see whether the delinquents of suffered deprivation

40
Q

What was Bowlby’s 44 thieves study procedure?

A

Procedure: Bowlby interviewed 44 adolescencts who were referred to a child protection program in London, because of stealing Bowlby selected another group of 44 children to act as the control group (children who had emotional problems, but had not yet committed any crimes)
He interviewed parents from both groups to state whether their children had experienced separation during the critical period and for how long.

41
Q

What were Bowlby 44 thieve study findings?

A

He found that more than half of the juvenile thieves had been separated from their mothers for longer than six months. During the first five years in the control group he found the only two had had such a separation.

He also found that several of the young thieves 32%. Sign of affection of psychopathy.

He also found that 60 children who had spent time apart from their mothers before the age of four showed lower achievement in school

42
Q

What is the conclusion to thief study?

A

Affection psychopath show little concerned for others, and our enable to form relationships. bowlby concluded that the reason for the antisocial behaviour and emotionless problems in the first group is due to maternal deprivation.

43
Q

A evaluation for the 44 thieves study

A

There is supporting evidence that Bowlby provided in the form of clinical interviews of retrospective data on those who had and had not separated from their primary caregiver

This meant the bowlby was asking the participants to look back and recall separations. These memories may not be accurate. He also conducted and design the experiment himself, which may have led to experimental bias.

Another criticism is that it concluded, the affection of psychopathy was caused by maternal deprivation. This is correlational data, and as such only shows a relationship between these two variables other external variables, such as diet, parental income, education, et cetera may have affected the behaviour of the thieves and not as concluded the disruption of attachment bond.

44
Q

Romanian orphan studies, effects of institutionalisation key study 1 rutter and Sonia barke

A

They wanted to see whether disinhibited attachment was more likely for those who were institutionalised

They conducted a longitudinal study of 165, Romanian children who spend their early lives in institutions

111 of these were adopted before the age of two and 54 by the age of four

adoptees were tested at regular intervals for 6,11 and 15 years to assess the physical social and cognitive development.
The information was gathered through interviews with parents and teachers.

Progress was compared to 52 British children adopted in the UK before six months

45
Q

What conclusions can you gather from Rutter and Sonia bark study

A

Long-term consequences may be less severe than was once thought, if children have the opportunity to form attachments

If the children do not form attachments then the consequences are likely to be more severe

46
Q

Romanian often studies effects of issues, socialisation the Bucharest intervention project zeanah et al
key study 2

A

They carried out a longitudinal study on the physical growth and health of 36 Romanian orphans adopted by Canadian families and compare them to a group of children raised in normal Canadian families

Data was collected for each child at three time points, 11 months after adoption at 4 1/2 years of age and at 10 1/2 years of age

47
Q

findings of the Bucharest early intervention project?

A

The first two sets of results showed that the adoptees were behind the non-institutionalised group, however, by 10 1/2 years old, there were no difference between the two groups remaining or had caught up with the children raised in normal Canadian families

48
Q

Other effects of institutionalisation deprivation dwarfism

A

Children who are institutionalised are usually smaller. Lack of emotional care could affect with hormones causing under development.

garner studied the case of an eight month girl who had to be fed through feeding tube due to malformation. Her mum would never cuddle her due to fear of dislodging the tube

at eight months old She was withdrawn and physically stunted and she was admitted to hospital with attention of hospital staff. She thrived off the attention. return to normal,

therefore emotional disturbances may affect the production of growth hormones

49
Q

Evaluation of effects of institutionalisation

A

There is real life application, studying the Romanian orphans has enhanced start understanding of the effects of institutionalisation. Such results have led to improvements in the way children are cared for in institutions. One or two caregivers place Central well for the child this is called a key worker

It’s hard to research the effects of institutionalisation in isolation, because the children were dealing with multiple factors, which functioned as confounding participant variables

The remaining orphanages were not typical. The conditions were so bad that the results may not be able to be applied to the understanding of improving institutionalised care.

50
Q
A