Beliefs Flashcards
organisations,theories
weber
what are substantive definitions of religion?
exclusive
focus on the belief in a supernatual power or God- exclusive
durkheim
what are functional definitions of religion?
inclusive
focuses on social or psychological functions religion performs for for an individual or society
alderidge- interpritivist approach
what are constructionist definitions of religion?
focuses on how each individal defines religion from their own experiences
we cannot produce a universal definition
who are a part of the functionalist theories of religion?
see society as a system of linked and realted parts or institutions
durkheim
malinowski
parsons
bellah
functional alternatives
religious organistations- troeltsch
what churches?
- bureaucratic + closely linked to the state
- ideologically conservative
- universalistic- open membership
- claim a monopoly on truth
religious organistations- troeltsch
what are sects?
- small organisations
- exclusive- not for everyone
- hostile to wider society
- charaismatic leader
- claim a monopoloy on truth
religious organistations- niebuhr
what are denominations?
middle between churches and sects
* membership- less exclusive than sect
* broadly accept societies values not linked to state
* do not claim a monopoly on truth
religious organistations- reiki cult
what are cults?
the least organised type of religious organistation
* highly individualised, loose knit made up of small groups aroound shared themes
* exclusive
* led by therapists or practitioners who claim special knowledge
* tolerant of beliefs of others and do not demand strong commitment
* world-affirming- claiming to improve life
wallace
what are the similarities and diffs between the types of religious organistations?
- how they see themselves- churches and sects claim their interpritation of faith is the only legit and right one WHEREAS demoninations + cults- accept that there can be many valid ones
- how they are seen by wider society- churches + denominations= respectable WHEREAS sects and cults = deviant
religious organistations
what do stark and bainbridge argue about sects and cults?
they originate out of conflict with wider society
* e.g sects result from splits from existing organistaions (schisms) and tend to offer other worldly benifits like passage to heaven
* cluts - are new religions e.g scientology, they offer this world and followers benefits like good health or happiness now and apeal to those who are seeking spiritual fulfilment or experincing health issues
religious organistations
how are cults subdivided by stark and bainbridge?
doomsday cults
- audience cults- least organised, do not involve any formal membership or much commitment + little interaction between members
- client cults- based off the relationship between the consultant and client and provide services to their followers, ofetn promise personal fulfilment and self discovery e.g reiki
- cultic movements- most organisednmand demand higher lvl of commitment than others, can be born out of client cults e.g scientology, aim to meet the needs of all members- little to no interaction with other cults or religions
religious movements- wallis
what are new religious movements?
since the 1960’s there has been a increase in the number of new reigions and organistaions (NRMs) there are three types:
1. world rejecting
2. world accomodating
3. world affirming
religious movements- wallis
what are world rejecting NRM’s?
often known as sects tend to be small and critical of mainstream society
religious movements- wallis
what are world accommodating NRM’s?
like denominations
often brakawyas from existing mainstream churches or denominations e.g neo-pentacostalists ( broke away from catholisism)
neither accepting or rejecting the world- focus on religious rather than worldy matters- want to regain and restore the spiritual purity of religion
religious movements- wallis
what are some charecteristics of world accomodating NRMs?
- individual worship and realsing human potential
- accept world as it is
- non- critical of other religions
- no social control and punishment
- not exclusive
- examples include neo-pentacostalism
what are charecteristics of world rejecting NRM’s?
- clear belief in God
- limited contact with the world
- conservative moral codes (abortion, contraception)
- very critical of other religions and society
- high level of control over members lives
- very exclusive- need to sacrifice a lot to be a member
examples include the mason family, the peoples temple
religious movements- wallis
what are world affirming NRM’s?
help individuals realise their full potential making them highly individualistic and are low commitment.
religious movements- wallis
what are some charecteristics og world affirming NRM’s?
- highly inclusive
- claim to access spititual or supernatual superpowers and aim to help members access these also
- lack any form of religious doctrine
- tolerant of other religions
examples include scientology, human potential movement
religious movements- weber and troeltsch
why are NRM’s growing according to them?
marginality
t- members of sects tend to draw members from the poor and oppressed
w- sects offer a solution to marginality by offering religious explanations and justifications for their suffering and disadvantage
religious movements- stark and bainbridge
why are NRM’s growing according to them?
relative deprivation
the subjective senve of deprivation in relation to others- m.c are well off they still feel spiritually deprived
* it the rd who breakaway from churches to form sects that safeguard the original message of the organistaion
* worldy reject sects offer the deprived with the compensation and validation taht they need for the rewards that they are denied in this world
* contrast- privilaged need no compensators or wordly rejecting religion so attracted o world accepting churches that express and support their status
religious movements- wilson and bruce
why are NRM’s growing according to them?
social change
w= periods of rapid change disrupt and undemine established n+v producing anomie or normlessness
in respone to this ppl turn to sects as a solution
b= growth of sects and cults == response to the social changes involved in modernisation and secularistaion, society is now secularised= ppl less attrcated to traditional churches and strict sects ( demand too much commitment= ppl now prefer cults ( less demanding)
wallace
why are world rejecting NRM’s growing?
social changes from the 1960’s impacted young people
* gave them freedom from adult responsibilites and enabled a counterculture to develop + growth for radical polictical movements offered alternative ideas about the future
* attractive due to providining an idealistic way of life
* failure of counterculture to change world= youth turn to religion
bruce
why are world affirming NRM’s growing?
respone to modernity essp the rationalisaion of work
* work no longer provides meaning or identity unlike the past when protestant ethic= work meaning to some
* provide both sense of identity and techniques that promise succes in world
niebuhr
how have sects developed?
- world rejecting and come into existence because they split from an establisehd church that has disagreement over doctrine
- sects= short lived + within a gen they die out or compromise the world abandoning their ideas becoming a denomination
what is the reason for sects being short lived?
- second gen- lack commitment
- protestqant ethic effect- practice aseticism become prospurus and move up
- death of a leader- sects with charistamic leader either collaspe or a more formal bureurqatic leader takes over making it a denomination