Attraction Flashcards
factors that predict attraction
proximity, familiarity, reciprocal liking, similarity, physical attractiveness
the idea that your initial like/disliking is intensified with how often you see them (there isn’t really data to support this yet)
intensification hypothesis
two common assumptions about attraction
opposites attract and complementarity
attracted to those of similar physical attractiveness
matching hypothesis
gender differences in attraction
men: primarily physical attractiveness and youth
women: physical attractiveness, wealth, status, age
the downside of being physically attractive
more undesired sexual advances, more resentment from the same sex, difficulty interpreting positive feedback, if used to advantage it will backfire
what do we find attractive in a face
particular facial features (i.e. “babyface)
symmetry
averageness
what do we find attractive in a body
men: average weight, shoulder to hip ratio a V
women: around average weight, waist 1/3 narrower than hips
evolutionary perspective on attraction
males prefer healthy, fertile-looking female that can pass along quality genes
females prefer a strong, dominant looking make that can protect and provide resources
basic premises of attachment theory
human infants require extensive caregiving to survive
infants use attachment figure as a secure base from which to explore and a safe haven for comfort and protection when needed
differences in caregiving = patterns in relating and “attaching” to others across the lifespan (secure and insecure attachment)
confidence that attachment figure will be available, responsive, and able to help
secure attachment
no confidence that attachment figure will be available, responsive, and able to help
insecure attachment
breakdown of percentages of attachment styles
secure = 56% anxious/ambivalent = 21% avoidant = 23%
secure attachment style
caregivers: appropriately, warmly responsive to needs, showed positive emotions, encouraged explanation
adults: trust that others will maintain love and support
beliefs about SOR: self as likable, others can be trusted, love can last
anxious-ambivalent attachment style
caregivers: inconsistent due to preoccupation with own needs, over-bearing affection, discouraged exploration
adults: fear of abandonment, feel needs not met
beliefs about SOR: self-doubt; others don’t meet needs and are less willing to commit to relationships; can easily fall in love
avoidant attachment style
caregivers: aloof and distant, present but unresponsive, forced exploration
adults: defensive detachment from others
beliefs about SOR: self is hard to get to know; rare to find someone you can easily fall in love with; love rarely lasts
correlates of secure attachment
more positive emotions during social interactions
more positive beliefs about romantic relationships
less loneliness
greater adaptiveness to relational conflict
more enjoyment of sex
longer duration of relationships
correlates of anxious-ambivalent attachment
more negative emotions during social interactions
falls in and out of love more often; preoccupied with relationships
more jealousy, more unstable emotions
higher level of self-disclosure and early intimacy
likes sex for physical contact
shorter duration of relationships (repeated breakups)
correlates of avoidant attachment
more negative emotions during social interactions
more likely to believe that true love doesn’t exist
greater loneliness
more distancing responses to relational conflict
low levels of self-disclosure and intimacy
more sexual promiscuity
intense longing for union
passionate love
feelings of intimacy and affection for those we care about deeply
compassionate love
after 1 year, couples (on average) report
lower satisfaction with relationship, fewer shared pleasurable experiences, more shared instrumental activities, more ambivalence about the relationship, lower passionate love
Gottman’s “Big 4” perspective on relationship problems
criticism - attacking partner’s personality
contempt - insults, histility, negative actions/tone
defensiveness - protecting self as main focus
stonewalling - emotional or physical attractiveness
Gottman’s remedies
criticism - making specific claims and requests
contempt - validate your partner
defensiveness - practice non-defensiveness
stonewalling - “conscious communication”