attitudes to work- workplace sabotage Flashcards

1
Q

workplace sabotage

A
  • rule-breaking behaviours aimed at hindering work progress
  • result of DISSATISFACTION+POWERLESSNESS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Taylor+Walton- why are rules broken/employees make conscious decision to stop self+others from working for an org

A
  • caused by frustration- employees feel powerless
  • attempt to make work conditions BETTER (wages, physical conds)
  • attempt to challenge authority- employees feel leaders aren’t performing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

absenteeism

A

significant cost to organisation caused by workplace stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

organisational commitment

A

involvement in organisation’s goals+groupwork

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

voluntary absenteeism

A

worker chooses not to attend work due to dissatisfaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

involuntary absenteeism

A

absence usually due to illness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Blau+Boal used job involvement+organisational commitment to predict

A

turnover+absenteeism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

HIGH JI, HIGH OC

A

‘stars of org’
work important for self esteem, low turnover, likely promoted
absent due to medical reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

HIGH JI, LOW OC

A

‘lone wolves’
work important but only focus on ind work, not group
absent due to career enhancing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

LOW JI, HIGH OC

A

‘corporate citizens’
work unimportant, but identity w/ org important, effort on groupwork, less on ind
normative absence: habitual predictable leaves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

LOW JI, LOW OC

A

‘apathetic employees’- least valuable-work not viewed as important to self image
dont contribute to group maintenance
calculative absence: maximum leaves before sanction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

instrumental sabotage

A

trying to achieve limited demands(higher wages/change in socio-political power)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

demonstrative sabotage

A

protesting against management/injustice of accepted values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AIM of Giacalone+Rosenfield

A

explore employee reasons used to justify sabotage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

4 sabotage types

A
  1. work slowdowns(deliberate)
  2. destructiveness (purposeful damaging of property, resources)
  3. dishonesty (provide false info/fraud, misrepresenting data)
  4. causing chaos (creating confusion, disruption within workplace)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

G+R design+sample

A

quasi-experimental
38 unionised labourers in electrical factory
questionnaires constructed w/ help of ex-employee of 5 years service(listed ways used to sabotage company)

17
Q

sabotage METHODS questionnaire

A

rate 29 forms on 7 point scale
losing paperwork, pulling fire alarm, graffiti on bathroom walls

18
Q

sabotage REASONS questionnaire

A

rate 11 reasons using 7 point scale
self defense, eye for an eye, protect self/fam from boss, company deserved it, release of frustration

19
Q

G+R procedure

A

workers asked to rate set of reasons+methods justifying work sabotage on scale of 1(not justifiable)->7(totally justifiable)

median split performed on reasons creating 2 groups
high reason acceptors: wide variety of reasons
low reason acceptors: few reasons

20
Q

G+R results

A

sabotage justification: HIGH reason acceptors- slowdowns, destructions, chaos MORE justifiable than low
- no sig diffs for dishonesty, but high reason leant towards
- justifiable reasons for sabotage:
HIGH- protect oneself, self defense from boss
LOW- frustration release, for fun

21
Q

G+R conc:

A

acceptance seems to affect justification, except dishonesty
- slowdowns, destructions, chaos aim to hurt company, but NO MONETARY GAIN
- dishonesty- qualitatively diff(justified for diff reasons BUT misinterpreted by management)
- if sabotage=self serving, then hasn’t served DEMONSTRATIVE function
- dishonesty threatens self-esteem- others don’t