Attachment Part 2 Flashcards

1
Q

STUDY: Attachment from Infancy to Adulthood

METHOD: Assessed quality of caregiving experiences at various points in childhood: (3)

A
  • Maternal sensitivity
  • Maternal depression
  • Father’s absence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

STUDY RESULTS: Attachment from Infancy to Adulthood

A

Less supportive parenting and family instability predicted attachment insecurity in adulthood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Avoidance at age 18 predicted by:

A
  • Lower maternal sensitivity
  • Father’s absence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Anxiety at age 18 predicted by:

A

Higher maternal depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evidence that there’s an association between childhood caregiving experiences and

A

attachment in adulthood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Across longitudinal studies, average correlation of ? between childhood caregiving experiences and adult attachment style

A

correlation of 0.15

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Suggests that the effect is

A

small and that some people exhibit incongruent patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Positive early caregiving but

A

insecure attachment in adulthood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Negative early caregiving but

A

secure attachment in adulthood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

We are shaped by early caregiving experiences, but

A

these foundations are not fate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

STUDY: Attachment from Infancy to Adulthood - RESULTS:

Less supportive parenting, family instability, and lower quality friendships in childhood/adolescence predicted

A

attachment insecurity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Avoidance at age 18 predicted by:

A
  • Lower maternal sensitivity (-0.16)
  • Not consistently living with father (0.17)
  • Lower quality friendships (-0.13)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Anxiety at age 18 predicted by:

A
  • Higher maternal depression (0.10)
  • Lower quality friendships (-0.11)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The size of effect of friendship experiences is similar to the size of the

A

effect of caregiving experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Friendships in childhood are

A

just as important as experiences with caregivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Provide opportunities for internal working models to be tested and to have

A

expectations either reinforced or disconfirmed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Internal working models contribute to the stability of

A

attachment styles over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Confirmation bias

A

People are likely to interpret ambiguous social information in ways that are consistent with their internal working model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Selection effect

A
  • People tend to select partners that are consistent with their internal working models
  • Partner selection study from last class
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

STUDY: Stability in Adult Attachment? - RESULTS

A
  • At Time 2, 70% of people classified with same attachment style as Time1
  • BUT 30% classified with a different attachment style
21
Q

Suggests that attachment is

A

less stable than would be theoretically predicted

22
Q

Which attachment style is changing the most in T1?

A

AVOIDANT and ANXIOUS

23
Q

STUDY: Life Events and Changes to Attachment
RESULTS: Many life events lead to what types of changes in attachment security?

A

temporary changes in attachment security

24
Q

Events associated with decreased attachment security:

A
  • Getting into an argument with partner
  • Being physically apart from partner
  • Being sick
25
Events associated with increased attachment security:
* Dating someone new * Partner did something special for the person * Work promotion * Going on vacation
26
How enduring are these changes? - In general, people revert back to their
typical level of attachment security
27
Percentage of events that led to a more enduring change in attachment?
25% of events
28
Increasing Attachment Security - AGE
* People become less anxiously attached as they get older * Less clear results for avoidance
29
Wanting to become more securely attached is associated with
increases in attachment security for a 4-month period
30
Fostering more secure mental models - Anxiously attached:
Foster a secure model of self by learning to rely on others less for validation and learning to feel capable and valued in personal domains
31
Fostering more secure mental models - Avoidantly attached
Foster a secure model of others by challenging self to depend on others and self-disclose more
32
WHAT is associated with increased attachment security?
Psychotherapy
33
Multiple Attachment Styles - TABLE RESULTS
Everyone has relationships characterized by each of the 3 attachment styles (secure, avoidant, anxious)
34
Regardless of general attachment style, the majority of a person’s relationships are
Secure
35
General attachment style is related to the
prevalence of your relationships fitting a specific attachment style relative to other people
36
People who show a general avoidant attachment style have more
avoidant relationships than the securely or anxiously attached people do
37
People who show a general anxious attachment style have more
anxiously attached relationships than the securely or avoidantly attached people do
38
Everybody has relationships that are characterized by
all 3 attachment styles
39
Contributes to within person fluctuations in
Attachment style
40
Suggests that these fluctuations in attachment style may be a function of
which attachment model is cognitively accessible at a given moment
41
STUDY: Contextual Activation of Attachment - primed with warm/supportive VS primed critical/judgement
* People primed with warm/supportive relationship were more likely to seek emotional support than control group * People primed with critical/judgmental relationship were less likely to engage in growth- oriented coping (emphasizing learning from challenges) than control group
42
Coping responses unrelated to
general attachment style
43
Shows that attachment styles can be
primed and influence behaviour in theoretically consistent ways
44
Stability of attachment is moderated by
moderated by relationship length
45
Attachment style is more stable in
longer relationships
46
Implies that people will have more stable attachment styles with
their parents and other people they’ve know for a long time than with romantic partners or newer friends
47
Attachment at any given moment is determined by: (2)
1) Chronic/general attachment style 2) State level of attachment
48
Chronic/general attachment style
* Influenced by caregiver experiences * Past important relationships, like childhood friendships * Some major life events * Age
49
State level of attachment
* Current and recent life events * Most recent interaction with an attachment figure (priming) * Relationship length