Attachment Part 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Bowlby’s Attachment Theory

A

Children are biologically predisposed to develop an attachment bond to caregivers as a means of increasing chances of their survival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Attachment experiences form (3)

A
  1. the basis of personality
  2. emotion regulation
  3. self- esteem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Main Characteristics of Attachment System (4)

A
  1. Proximity seeking and maintenance
  2. Separation distress
  3. Safe haven
  4. Securebase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Attachment is crucial for ? and forms the ?

A

Attachment is crucial for children’s psychological well-being and forms the basis of personality development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Development and quality of child’s attachments are highly dependent on their experiences with

A

caregivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Strange Situation - Paradigm designed to systematically assess children’s

A

attachment to a specific caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is The Strange Situation?

A

Caregiver and child play in a room together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Examines how children react to: (3)

A
  • Separations from caregiver
  • Reunions with caregiver
  • Meeting a stranger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Secure Attachment

A

60%; Child distressed when parent left, but able to be soothed by stranger and seeks comfort upon reunion with parent; explores the room when parent is present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Avoidant Attachment

A

15%; Child does not display signs of distress upon separation from parent, plays by themselves, and disinterested in parent upon reunion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Anxious/ambivalent Attachment

A

10%; Child extremely distressed upon separation, not soothed by stranger, but takes a long time to be soothed upon reunion with parent/resists parent’s attempt to soothe; stays close to parent when parent is in the room and doesn’t explore much

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disorganized Attachment

A

15%; Behaviour is contradictory. Seems to want to approach parent but also sees them as a source of fear. Frequently appear dazed and dissociated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Securely Attached Children - Parents’ behaviour

A
  • Generally supportive/sensitive to child’s needs
  • Affectionate and expresses frequent positive emotions towards child
  • Fosters autonomy and exploration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Securely Attached Children - Child learns that

A

Proximity seeking is a good strategy to soothe distress/ to have needs met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Parents of Avoidantly Attached Children - Parent’s behaviour:

A
  • Consistently insensitive to the child’s signals
  • Avoids close contact or rejects child’s bids for contact
  • May be angry or impatient
  • Discourages displays of emotion
  • OR parent is consistently over-bearing and intrusive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Parents of Avoidantly Attached Children - Child learns that

A

Proximity seeking is not a good strategy to soothe distress/ to have needs met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Parents of Avoidantly Attached Children - Child’s Deactivation of the attachment system

A
  • Attention diverted away from threat
  • Avoid proximity of caregiver when distressed
  • Cope with distress by suppressing it or avoiding situations that elicit distress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Parents of Anxiously Attached Children - Parents’ behaviour:

A

Inconsistent in reacting to child’s distress, sometimes soothing and attentive and other times insensitive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Parents of Anxiously Attached Children - Child learns that

A

Proximity is sometimes a good strategy to soothe distress, but not always

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Parents of Anxiously Attached Children - Childs Hyperactivation of attachment system

A
  • Hypervigilance to threat and exaggerated perceptions of threat * Excessive proximity-seeking of caregiver when distressed
  • Cope with distress by heightening it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Parents of Children with Disorganized Attachment - Parents’ behaviour:

A
  • Frightens the child
  • May be harsh or abusive
  • Often struggle with severe mental health issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Parents of Children with Disorganized Attachment - Child learns that

A
  • Proximity seeking often results in feeling scared
  • Caregiver is extremely unpredictable and cannot be trusted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Other Factors Influencing Attachment - Infant’s temperament

A
  • Infant’s vary insensitivity and how easy they are to soothe
  • Infant’s that are more sensitive are more likely to develop anxious attachment
  • Those that are less sensitive are more likely to develop secure or avoidant attachment
24
Q

Other Factors Influencing Attachment - Socialization of gender roles

A
  • Males are more likely to develop avoidant (vs.anxious)attachment
  • Females more likely to develop anxious (vs.avoidant)attachment
25
Other Factors Influencing Attachment - Safety vs. danger of environment
More likely to develop insecure attachment when growing up in more dangerous environment
26
Attachment in Adulthood - Attachment relationships have similar functions in
adulthood as they do in childhood (Proximity seeking/ maintenance, separation distress, safe haven, secure base)
27
Romantic partners are most common
attachment figures in adults (best friends too)
28
Adult attachment style is related to
childhood experiences due to internal working models
29
Define Internal Working Models
Mental representations of the self, of attachment figures, and of relationships in general that are constructed as a result of experiences with caregivers
30
Filter through which interactions with attachment figures are
interpreted throughout life
31
Guide expectations about
relationships throughout life
32
Avoidance Dimension
Discomfort with closeness and intimacy To what extent are others reliable? Low avoidance = others are reliable
33
Anxiety Dimension
Vigilance and concerns about rejection and abandonment To what extent is the self worthy of love? Low anxiety = self is worthy of love
34
Internal Working Models - Secure
Comfortable with closeness and interdependence, but also seeks autonomy low anxiety and low avoidance
35
Internal Working Models - Anxious
Fear of rejection and abandonment because believes self is “not good enough” Leads to a heightened need for reassurance and becoming overly controlling/clingy high anxiety and low avoidance
36
Internal Working Models - Dismissive-avoidant
Avoid seeking closeness to protect self from being let down by others Often emotionally distant, prioritize independence, and find it difficult to trust/rely on others low anxiety and high avoidance
37
STUDY: Support Seeking in Couples - Does attachment style influence support- seeking behaviour in couples? RESULTS
More anxiety related to more support seeking for secures, but less support seeking for avoidants Consistent with children’s behaviour in the Strange Situation
38
Internal Working Models - Fearful-avoidant/ Disorganized
Strong need for closeness but distrusts others and sees self as deserving of rejection. Leads to inconsistent way of meeting attachment needs. high anxiety and high avoidance
39
Dismissive-avoidants deactivate:
deactivate both overt attachment behaviours AND covert (internal) attachment system * Reduced physiological response when imagining separation from partner
40
Fearful avoidants only deactivate:
Only deactivate overt attachment behaviours, BUT are unable to deactivate covert attachment system * Elevated physiological response when imagining separation from partner
41
Adult Attachment Style Distributions (%)
* 56% secure (vs. 60% in kids) * 25% avoidant (vs. 15% in kids) * 19% anxious (vs. 10% in kids)
42
Researchers tend to no longer categorize people into
attachment styles (categorical approach)
43
Attachment is measured using a
continuous approach
44
Degree of attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance measures
separately
45
Anxiety:
* “I often worry that my partner doesn't really love me.” * “My desire to be very close sometimes scares people away.”
46
Avoidance:
* “I prefer not to show a partner how I feel deep down.” * “I find it difficult to allow myself to depend on romantic partners.”
47
Secure attachment (low anxiety and low avoidance) associated with:
* Higher self-esteem * Greater tendency to seek out social support * Better conflict-resolution skills * Higher life satisfaction * Better relationship satisfaction
48
STUDY: Attachment and Partner Selection - Time 1 Results
* No anxious-anxious or avoidant-avoidant pairs * Relationship satisfaction lower in relationships with at least one in securely attached partner * Lowest relationship satisfaction in anxious-avoidant couples
49
Anxious-Avoidant Pair: Chronic relationship
dissatisfaction
50
Anxious partner wants more
closeness than avoidant is willing to provide *Ends up feeling not good enough and “too much”
51
Avoidant partner wants more
independence than anxious partner is willing to accept * Ends up feeling trapped and suffocated
52
Attachment and Partner Selection: At follow-up 3 years later:
Avoidant-anxious pairs were most likely to still be together
53
Strange given relationship satisfaction results from
TIME 1
54
Explaining the Stability of the Anxious-Avoidant Pair - Familiarity:
Each partner’s attachment pattern is consistent with internal working model
55
For anxiously attached partner, avoidant’s distance mirrors their experience of
inconsistent caregiving, triggering their pursuit of closeness
56
For the avoidant partner, anxious partner’s pursuit of closeness mirrors their experiences of
attachment figures being intrusive or not meeting their needs (e.g. for autonomy), triggering their instinct to retreat and protect independence
57
Explaining the Stability of the Anxious-Avoidant Pair - Complimentary dynamic
Anxious partner’s pursuit of closeness feeds into the avoidant’s tendency to withdraw, creating a maladaptive cycle