Attachment: Bowlby Flashcards
AO1/Description
- Attachment is beneficial for survival (adaptive) so we’ve evolved attachment behaviours which make parents feed, care for, scare off predators etc
- Babies have social releasers to make parents stay proximate and care for their children i.e. crying
- Critical period up to about 2.5 years where attachment needs to occur for a health normal human to emerge i.e. separation causes emotional and intellectual issues e.g. Affectionless psychopathy (We think of it more now as a sensitive period)
- Monotropy: Usually one bond more important than any other, Bowlby usually focuses on the mother who the child will look to for care and attention rather than others
- Secure or safe base also ties into Bowlby’s theory (using your parent as a base from which to explore and interact with the world)- if they’re a safe base to explore the child becomes competent and resilient in new situations
- Internal working model- your early relationship becomes a schema for future relationships (how you expect to be treated)…continuity hypothesis (future relationships match early ones) i.e. if your mother is sensitive as a care giver this gets stored in your memory and becomes the basis for future relationships
+AO3 Lorenz
baby geese go through imprinting and critical periods which shows that attachment is evolved & shows critical period
+AO3 Harlow
Showed deprivation (only having the wire mother) effects the monkey’s exploration, socialisation and confidence
+AO3 Bowlby 44 thieves
demonstrates that separation during early years causes delinquency and affectionless psychopathy
+AO3 Useful
daycare/hospitals i.e. getting key workers, increasing contact time with parents
+AO3 Hazan & Shaver
IWM supported- adult relationships do match childhood (when measured via self-report)
-AO3 Testability
Hard to test evolutionary theories (retrospective, post-hoc etc)
-AO3 Animal studies
do not apply to humans because our behaviour, attachment styles etc might not be the same
-AO3 Robertson and Robertson
don’t need mother care other substitutes would do as long as you get good care (therefore Bowlby may have been wrong)
-AO3 Reductionist
Treated Deprivation effects and Privation effects similarly ignoring important differences which means his theory might not be valid about this aspect
-AO3
Focused on separation rather than the reasons for separation
-AO3 Schaffer and Emerson
27% have joint attachments therefore monotropy may not be as true/vital as Bowlby suggests
-AO3 bias? Social Control?
Over focus on mother which ignores other vital attachments and may make it less valid
-AO3 Socially sensitive
parent blaming for their children’s relationships etc