Attachment Flashcards
carer-infant interactions: reciprocity
when each person responds to the other and elicits a response from them
carer-infant interactions: interactional synchrony
the temporal co-ordination of micro level social behaviour
mirroring each other’s actions and emotions. E.g a baby laughs and giggles at the same time the carer pulls silly faces.
carer-infant interactions: interactional synchrony research - facial expressions
Meltzoff and Moore
observed beginnings of IS in babies as early as 2 weeks
adult displayed 1 of 3 facial expressions or distinctive gestures
childs response was filmed and identified by independent observers
an association was found between the expression or gesture and the actions of the babies
carer-infant interactions: interactional synchrony research - quality of attachment
Isabella
observed 30 mothers and infants together
assessed the degree of synchrony and the quality of the mother-infant attachment
found high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality attachments
attachment figures: parent-infant attachment - research
Schaffer and Emerson
found majority of babies did become attached to their mother first
formed secondary attachments to other people in the family after a few weeks or months
75% of infants had attached to father by 18 months
attachment figures: role of the father - research - play
Grossman
longitudinal study
looking at parents’ behaviour and its relationship with the quality of the children attachments into their teens
found that the quality of the infant-mother attachment was related to children’s attachments in teen years but NOT the infant-father attachment
BUT
quality of fathers’ play with infant did relate to the quality of adolescent attachment
attachment figures: fathers as primary caregivers
evidence that when fathers are the primary caregivers they adopt behaviours more typical to mothers
Field
filmed 4 month old babies in face to face interaction with primary caregiver mothers and fathers and secondary caregiver fathers
primary caregivers spent more time smiling, imitating and holding infants
these behaviours seem to be more important in building an attachment with the infant
fathers can be the more nurturing attachment figure
the key the attachment relationship is the level of responsiveness not the gender of the parent
carer-infant interactions evaluation: observations
its hard to tell if the interactions are the same or similar
we can’t be certain, based on these observations, whats taking place from the infants perspective
carer-infant interactions evaluation: good control
observations are generally well controlled
both are filmed from multiple angles
this means very fine details can be recorded and analysed
the infant doesn’t care about being observed so their behaviour doesn’t change in response to the controlled observation
attachment figures evaluation: inconsistent findings in role of the father
research into the role of the father is confusing as different researchers are interested in different questions
seeing the father as the primary or secondary attachment figures
generally have seen for secondary figures have behaved differently from mothers and having a distinct role
for primary figures have seen that they take on the maternal role
this means its hard to answer the question: what is the role of the father?
attachment figures evaluation: limited generalisability
Grossman
found fathers as secondary figures had an important role in their child’s development
however
MacCallum and Golombok
found children growing up in single or same sex families do not develop differently from those in heterosexual families
this suggests that the fathers role isnt as important as first thought
attachment figures evaluation: gender
fathers might not become primary figures due to traditional gender roles
women are expected to be more caring and nurturing
or
it could be female hormones (oestrogen) create higher levels of nurturing and so women are biologically pre-disposed to be the primary figure
Schaffers stages of attachment: study
longitudinal study
60 babies
31 male
29 female
Glasgow, skilled working class families
babies and mothers visited in their homes:
every month for a year
then after 18 months
asked mothers questions about the kind of protest the babies showed in seven everyday separations
also assessed strange anxiety
found:
50% showed separation anxiety to a particular adult at 25-32 weeks
attachment tended to be to the caregiver who was most interactive and sensitive to the signals and facial expressions
80% had a specific attachment and almost 30 % had multiple attachments at 40 weeks
Schaffers stages of attachment: stages
Asocial - first few weeks
baby is recognising and forming bonds with cares
behaviour to human and non human objects is the same
Indiscriminate attachment - 2-7 months
show preference for people
no separation or stranger anxiety
Specific attachment - 7 months
show stranger and separation (from one particular adult) anxiety
primary attachment figure
Multiple attachments - 8 months
extend attachments
secondary attachment figures
Schaffers stages of attachment evaluation: good external validity
carried out in the families’ home and most of the observation was done by the parents
so the babies behaviour is unlikely to be affected by the presence of others
Schaffers stages of attachment evaluation: longitudinal design
same children where followed up and observed regularly
better internal validity than a cross-sectional design
dont have the confounding variable of individual differences
Schaffers stages of attachment evaluation: limited sample
only 60 babies
all from same area, class, culture, 50 years ago
child rearing practices differ from one culture to another and from one historical period to another
hard to generalise to other social and historical contexts
Schaffers stages of attachment evaluation: asocial stage
babies are so young and have poor co-ordination and immobile
hard to observe their behaviour
can’t rely on the evidence
Schaffers stages of attachment evaluation: conflicting evidence for multiple attachments
when they form multiple attachments
psychologists working in cultural contexts where multiple carers is normal suggest babies have multiple attachments from the outset
collectivist cultures
Schaffers stages of attachment evaluation: measuring multiple attachments
Bowlby
pointed out that children have playmates as well as attachment figures
may get distressed when playmate leaves but it doesn’t signify an attachment
Schaffers and Emersons observations dont allow us to distinguish between playmates and attachment figures
animal studies: Lorenz
studied imprinting
divided a clutch of goose eggs
- hatched with mother
- hatched in incubator with Lorenz as the first moving object they see
found that incubator group followed Lorenz even when mixed
however there was a critical period in which imprinting needed to take place (depends on species)
animal studies: Lorenz case study
peacock that was brought up in a reptile house of a zoo
first moving thing it saw was giant tortoises
as an adult would only direct courtship behaviours towards giant tortoises
sexual imprinting
animal studies: Harlow.
separated baby rhesus monkeys from mother and put in harlow’s lab.
Importance of tactile comfort - why we attach.
experiment 1: two groups of monkeys, both provided with two surrogate mothers in a cage, one made out of wire and the other made out of soft towelling cloth.
First group: cloth mother provided milk, wire mother provided no milk
second group: wire mother provided milk, cloth mother no milk.
Harlow - findings
found that monkeys cuddled soft object in preference to the wire one, spent more time with cloth mother, only went to wire mother for food.
sought comfort from towelling when frightened
released maternally deprived monkeys back into wild
found that monkeys in 3. were most dysfunctional
those with a soft toy still didn’t develop normal social behaviour
more aggressive and less sociable and bred less
as mothers some of them neglected their young or attacked their children even killing them in some cases
concluded theres a critical period for this behaviour
mother figure had to introduced within 90 days for an attachment to form
early deprivation is irreversible
Lorenz evaluation: generalisability
problem with generalising
mammalian attachment system is very different from birds
e.g. mammalian mothers show more emotional attachments to their young than birds do
Lorenz evaluation: questioning of his conclusions
researchers have questioned some of his conclusions
e.g. the idea that imprinting has a permanent effect on mating behaviour
Guiton
found chickens that imprinted on yellow washing up gloves would try to mate with them but with experience would learn to prefer mating with other chickens
Harlow evaluation: theoretical value
findings has a profound effect on psychologists understanding of human attachment
Harlow showed that attachment doesn’t develop as a result of being fed by a mother figure but as a result of comfort
showed the importance of the quality of early relationships on later social development
Harlow evaluation: practical value
important applications
e.g. social workers understand the risk factors in child neglect and abuse and so intervene to prevent it
important in the care of captive monkeys for zoos and in breeding programs
Harlow evaluation: ethical issues
monkeys suffered greatly
species are considered similar enough to humans to generalise findings therefore means their suffering was likely to be human-like
but
the rewards outweighed the costs
learning theory of attachment
Dollard and Miller
cupboard love approach using learning theory
emphasises on caregiver giving food - children learn to love whoever feeds them
learning theory of attachment: classical conditioning
learning to associate the mother with food
unconditioned stimulus = food
being fed = unconditioned response (pleasure)
caregiver = initially neutral stimulus
mother then through constant association with being fed becomes conditioned stimulus producing conditioned response
learning theory of attachment: operant conditioning
if behaviour produces a pleasant consequence then its likely to be repeated again
behaviour has been reinforced
explains why babies cry for comfort which builds attachment
crying = response from carer e.g. feeding
response = pleasure
crying is reinforced
baby then directs crying to the caregiver that responds to the crying
two way process
this is negative reinforcement for the carer
they respond = crying stops
so they repeat their behaviour to avoid the unpleasant crying
learning theory of attachment: attachment as a secondary drive
draws on the concept of drive reduction
hunger is the primary drive - we are motivated to eat to reduce the hunger drive
Sears
suggested that the caregivers that provide food have the primary drive of hungry generalised to them
so attachment is the secondary drive learned by association between the caregiver and the satisfaction of the primary drive
learning theory of attachment evaluation: counter evidence from animal research
a range of animal studies has shown that young animals don’t attach for food but for comfort instead
Lorenz’s geese imprinted before being fed
Harlow’s monkeys
using the learning theory this should be the same for humans as they believe that non-human animals and humans are equivalent
learning theory of attachment evaluation: counter evidence from human research
Schaffer and Emerson
many babies formed primary attachments to their mother figure even though other carers did most of the feeding
shows that feeding isnt the key element to attachment so theres no unconditioned stimulus or primary drive
learning theory of attachment evaluation: ignores other factors
factors like reciprocity and good interactional synchrony is associated with attachment
studies have shown the best attachments are with sensitive carers that pick up infant signals and respond appropriately
doesn’t support cupboard love theory
Bowlbys monotropic theory
evolutionary explanation
attachment is an innate system that gave a survival advantage
imprinting and attachment evolved because they ensure that young stay close to their caregivers and this protects them from any hazards
monotropy
he placed great emphasis on a childs attachment to one particular caregiver
this was the ‘mother’ - doesn’t have to be biological
he believed this attachment is different and more important than the others
more time spent with the baby = better