attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Attachment

A

A close two way emotional bond between two individuals in which each person sees the other as essential for their own emotional security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 characteristics of attachment

A

Proximity
Secure base behaviour
Separation distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reciprocity

A

A description of how 2 ppl interact. Mother-infant interaction is reciprocal in that both infant and mother respond to each other signals and each eilicits a response from eachother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Alert phases

A

From birth, babies signal when they are ready to interact eg eye contact- Feldman and Eldelman said mothers pick up on alertness 2/3 of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Interactional synchrony

A

Mother and infant reflect both the actions and emotions of eachother in a co-ordinated way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Synchrony begins

A

Babies mirror adults gestures from 2 weeks old looking at one of the three facial expressions or gestures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Importance of attachment

A

Synchrony linked to better quality mother attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluation of caregiver infant interaction

A

+ Meltzoff and Moore supports interactional synchrony. They found that 2-3 week old children do imitate adults specific facial expressions and hand movements. Infants interactional synchrony is an innate ability that helps form attachments

+controlled observations capture fine detail

-infants cannot speak so interpreting their behaviour is an issue making it hard to draw conclusions

  • studies should take place in child’s home to increase validity

-limited waking periods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Stage 1: asocial

A

0-8 weeks
Smile at anyone
Prefer faces to non-faces
Recognise specific faces
Happier in human presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stage 2: indiscriminate attachment

A

2-7 months
Recognise and prefer familiar ppl
Accept comfort from any adult
Prefer people then inanimate objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stage 3: specific attachment

A

7-12 months
Single strong attachment to one individual
Stranger anxiety
Separation anxiety
Familiar adults as secure base

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Stage 4: multiple attachments

A

1 year
Secondary attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Schaffer and emerson

A

Longitudinal study on 60 Glasgow infants 5-23 weeks old 31 male and female from working class homes
Mothers kept a diary of infants response to separation in 7 everyday situations eg left alone in a room, left with other ppl, left in their cot at night
These were designed to measure separation anxiety

Up to 3 months=stage 2
4 months= prefer certain ppl
7 months= single attachment figure
After 9 months= multiple attachments

Mother was main attachment figure for 65% and only 3% was their father.

Attachments form with those who accurately respond to babies signals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation Schaffer stages of attachment

A

+ external validity
Mother observed babies in their natural environment so reduces demand characteristics

+Real life application for day care as in first two stages there will be lack of stranger anxiety so parents plan to put children in these stages so they can better settle in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The importance of contact comfort procedure

A

16 monkeys observed with 2 wired monkeys in a cage. 1 wrapped in soft cloth and one was plain wire. Both dispensed milk in one condition, in another only the wired monkey did.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The importance of contact comfort findings

A

Monkeys went to the cloth covered mother especially when there was loud mechanical noises as they prefer contact comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Maternally deprived monkeys as adults

A

Those reared by plain- wired mothers were most dysfunctional. Those with cloth covered mothers also didn’t develop normal social behaviours and were more aggressive, less social, bred less then normal monkeys and attacked their children less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Critical period for normal development

A

A young monkey needs to be introduced to mother figure by 90 days for attachment to form after this deprivation was irreversible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Evaluation of Harlows monkeys

A

+Humans and monkeys are similar
Green (1994) states that on a biological level all mammals have the same brain structures as humans and the only diff is size and no of connections. Animal research enabled psychologists to study attachment as it wouldn’t of been possible with human pp’s.

+Important practical applications
Howe found research has helped social workers and health care professionals as can detect when bonding has been unsuccessful so they can intervene.

-Monkeys aren’t as advanced as humans

-Despite theoretical and practical applications the research caused the monkeys high distress and later life consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Role of the father

A

Schaffer and Emerson showed that primary attachment is more likely to be made with mothers and fathers are secondary attachment figure. Fathers have a role to do with play and stimulation. When fathers do take on the role of being the main caregiver they adopt behaviours typical of mothers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Rudolf and emerson

A

Babies 1st become attached to mothers by 7 months. 3% of the time was the father the primary caregiver. 27% were joint.
75% of babies studied formed an attachment with fathers by 18 months shown as they protested when father walked away.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Grossman

A

Did a longitudinal study looking at babies to adolescence
Quality of attachment to mother was related attachment in adolescence
Showing mothers attachment is more important
HOWEVER quality of fathers play with babies was related to quality of adolescence attachments suggesting mothers role is emotional development and fathers role is play and stimulation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Field (1978)

A

Filmed 4 month old babies face-to-face interaction with primary caregiver mothers, secondary fathers and primary fathers. Smiling imitation and holding babies are all part of reciprocity and interactional synchrony.
Fathers can be emotion focused primary caregivers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Evaluation of role of the fathers

A
  • Diff researchers want to answer diff questions
    eg wanting to understand the father as a secondary attachment figure and some are interested in the father as primary attachment figure
  • If fathers have a distinct role why are children without fathers different to those with them. Eg homosexual relationships
    +But do single mothers or lesbian couples just take on the extra role and adapt to compensate

+can offer advice to parents
Mothers do not have to be primary caregiver and leave work, fathers do not need to be breadwinners all due to stereotypes. Single mothers and lesbian couples show babies do not need a father

-Pre existing stereotypes of fathers may sway data and researchers may have a preconception of what to expect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Explanations of attachment: The learning theory

A

Children are born with a blank slate and all behaviour is learned due to associations (classical conditioning) or by patterns of reinforcement (operant conditioning)
Babies become attached to their caregiver because they learn to give them food also known as ‘cupboard love’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Learning theory

A
  1. Food is the unconditioned stimulus which produces an unconditioned response of pleasure. Caregiver is neutral stimulus
  2. Because he/ she is continually paired with the UCS she slowly becomes associated with it until mother alone can produce pleasure
  3. She is now a conditioned stimulus and the pleasure is a conditioned response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Positive reinforcement

A

Hungry infants feel uncomfy and are driven to reduce uncomfort. When fed the discomfort is reduced and feeds the pleasure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Primary reinforcer

A

Food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Secondary reinforcer

A

Caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What are the 2 opposing explanations of attachment?

A
  1. We attach because we learn through conditioning processes, so an infant learns to associate a caregiver with feeding.
  2. Bowlby’s evolutionary theory where we have an innate need to form a bond with the primary caregiver which has a survival value.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

procedure of imprinting

A

Lorenz randomly halved a large clutch of goose eggs. Half were left with their mother, half were hatched in an incubator and Lorenz/ their mother was the first moving object they saw.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

findings of imprinting

A

The incubated group followed Lorenz, their control group followed their mother. Even when mixed up, this still happened. Imprinting happens with species mobile from birth and there is a critical period where this must happen otherwise the babies will not form an attachment to their mother.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

sexual imprinting

A

Whoever they imprinted on they will later show courtship behavior towards.
Was found in peacocks who sexually imprinted on giant tortoises.

34
Q

John Bowlby

A

His theory suggests that there is a critical period for developing an attachment (0-5 years). If an attachment hasn’t developed during this period, then the child suffers from irreversible developmental consequence.

35
Q

Evaluation of Lorenz/ imprinting

A

+ Regain and Vallortigara (1995)
Chicks were exposed to a simple shape formation that moved. A range of shape formations were moved in front of them. They followed the first more closely, showing they’d imprinted.
+Seebach (2005) found computer users displayed ‘babyduck syndrome’ where they were attached to their first computer model and rejected others.
-Imprinting behavior isn’t representative of most bird species, let alone humans. Mammals work in a 2 way process- both baby and mother get attached.

36
Q

Privation

A

Occurs when children have never formed an attachment.

37
Q

Institution

A

A place people live for a long time (they do not go home in the evening) eg orphanages

38
Q

The Ceausescu regime

A

Aimed to increase population by not allowing abortion or contraception. Many families could not look after children so they were placed in orphanages were there was very little physical or emotional care and no cognitive stimulation.

39
Q

Rutters ERA Procedure

A

165 Romanian orphans adopted in Britain.
Tested for physical, cognitive and emotional development. Meant assessing each child 4,6, 11 and 15 yrs of age. They were looking to see if good care (adoption) could make up for poor early experiences.

40
Q

Rutters ERA findings

A

When orphans first arrived in the UK they were malnourished and physically and mentally retarded.
By age 11, those who were adopted before 6 months had an IG of 102.
Those adopted between 6 months and 2 years had an IG of 86.
Those adopted after 2 years had an IQ of 77.

41
Q

What were the effects of institutionalization?

A

Physical underdevelopment eg developmental dwarfism in Genie

Intellectual under functioning (low IQ)

Poor parenting themselves

Disinhibited attachment

42
Q

The Bucharest early intervention project procedure

A

Zeanah et al (2005) assessed 95 Romanian children ages 12-31 months who had spent an average of 90% of their life in an institution and compared them to a control group who spent their life in a “normal family”. Attachment type measured using the strange situation.

43
Q

The Bucharest early intervention project findings

A

The institutioanalized group group showed signs of disinhibited attachment. (44% vs less then 20% control group).
74% of the control group was securely attached but only 19% of the institutionalized group.
65% of this group were classified as disorganised attachment.

44
Q

Other research

A

Le Mare and Audet (2006) carried out a longitudinal study on the physical growth and health of 36 Romanian orphans adopted by Canadian families and compared them to a group of children raised in normal Canadian families.
Adopted orphans were physically smaller at age 4 1/2 yrs but the same size by 10 1/2 yrs and they also had the same health at this point.

45
Q

Evaluation of Romanian Orphan studies

A

-Individual differences
In Rutters ERA project the process was not interfered with so the adopted children were not randomly assigned so maybe the most sociable children were adopted first.
HOWEVER they were randomly assigned in Zeanah’s study which reduces metholodical issues.

-Roman orphanages are not typical of institutional care so lacking generalisability.

+Real world application
Improvements of how children are cared for in institutions (Langton 2006) egkeyworkers

+Confounding variables
Previous studies on orphans could not remove variables such as neglect. Rutter’s study did not have these variables as children can from generally loving homes. High internal validity.

-Lack of adult development data
Data development only goes up to early 20s making it hard to know key info like maintaining relationships contradicting the ‘caught up’ idea.

46
Q

Ainsworth’s strange situation criteria

A

Proximity seeking, separation anxiety, reunion behaviour, exploration and secure base behaviour.

47
Q

Insecure avoidant (Type A)

A

Did not orientate to mum when exploring
Unconcerned about stranger did not preference between stranger and mother. Often avoids both.
Unconcerned when mother leaves and little reaction when she returns.
20-25%

48
Q

Secure (Type B)

A

Explore unfamiliar environments but return for regular intervals.
Will move closer to mother when they see a stranger and be wary of them.
Stopped exploring when mother left but were subdued when mother left.
Approaches mother on arrival, easily calmed on reunion.
60-75%

49
Q

Insecure resistant

A

Cries more and explores less
Avoids stranger, showing fear
Intense distress when mother leaves
Resist comfort when reunited
3%

50
Q

Procedure of Strange Situation

A

Step 1- Mother and child enter playroom
Step 2- Child encouraged to explore
Step 3- Stranger enters and attempts to interact
Step 4- Mother leaves while stranger is present
Step 5- Mother enters and stranger leaves
Step 6- Mother leaves
Step 7- Stranger returns
Step 8- Mother returns and interacts with child

51
Q

Conclusion of Strange Situation

A

Most children are securely attached
The results determine the role of the mother’s behaviour in determining the quality of attachment.

52
Q

Evaluation of the strange situation

A

-Lacks ecological validity. Was done in a controlled environment and therefore children may have acted differently to how they would in a more familiar environment. Therefore we don’t know if behaviours displayed by the children eg high separation anxiety, would be the same to when children are in a familiar environment.

-What if the mother was not the PCG?
A large assumption was made here as the infant may have had different attachment styles with the multiple attachments they probably already had
Other attachment figures were ignored

+ As the research is highly operationalized, observers have a clear view of how a securely attached infant should behave, due to the specific criteria that Ainsworth used. For this reason, the research should have high inter-observer reliability & it is also replicable so its reliability can be checked.

53
Q

Bowlby’s monotropic theory

A

Rejects the Learning Theory idea of Attachment (about food) and proposes an evolutionary theory of attachment.

54
Q

Monotropy

A

The concept that infants have an innate capacity and drive to attach to one primary attachment figure.
The person had to be a woman . The more time spent with this caregiver the better.
Law of continuity= the more constantvthe child’s care is better quality the attachment.
Law of accumulated separation= The safest amount of separation is zero.

55
Q

Social releasers

A

Behaviours that babies are biologically pre-programmed to do, which attract the attention of caregivers eg crying, smiling and cooing.

56
Q

Critical period

A

The time during which are given behaviour is especially susceptible to, and requires specific enviornmental influences to develop normally. There is a sensitive period of around six months to 2 1/2 years.

57
Q

Internal working model

A

A mental representation of our relationship of our primary caregiver that becomes a template for future relationships, and allows individuals to predict, control and manipulate their environment. Affect our ability to be a parent.

58
Q

Evaluation of Bowlby

A

+ One strength is evidence supporting the role of social releasers. Cute baby behaviours are designed to elicit interaction from caregivers. Brazelton et al (1975) observed babies trigger interactions with adults using social releasers. Attachment figures were instructed to ignore the babies social releasers. Babies who were previously responsive, became distressed and motionless. This illustrates the role of social releasers in emotional development and how important they are for attachment development.

  • Lacks validity. Schaffer and Emerson found that, although most babies did attached to one person a significant minority formed multiple attachments at the same time. Although the first attachment does appear to have a particularly strong influence on later behaviour, it may not be a different quality from the child’s other attachments. Bowlby may be incorrect that there is a unique quality and importance of the child primary attachment.

+Support for the internal working model
Bailey et al (2007) assess attachment relationships in 99 mothers and their one year old. They measured the mother’s attachment to their own primary attachment figure. Assessed attachment quality of the babies. Mother of poor attachment to their own primary attachment figures were more likely to have poorly attached babies. Mothers ability to form attachments is influences by their internal working models.

59
Q

Individualistic

A

A society that values the individual over the group. Eg UK, USA

60
Q

Collectivist

A

A cultural pattern that emphasises the needs and goals of the group as a whole over the needs and desires of each individual eg China

61
Q

Van ljezendoom and Krooneberg (1988)

A

A meta- analyses which looked at 32 studies where the strange situation had been used in 8 different countries. 15 studies in the US. Results for over 1990 children.

62
Q

Evaluation of cultural variations in atttachment

A
  • McCormil et al secure babies have greater success at school, insecure resistant is associated with the worst outcomes eg bullying and adult mental health problems. Can predict future outcomes.

+Different observers agree on attachment type (94% in the same team, Bick 2012). Due to controlled conditions and behavioural categories. Removing observer bias.

-The Strange Situation may not have the same meaning in countries outside Europe and the US. This means babies respond differently (Japanese babies are not used to being left so have high anxiety) We do not know what the SS is measuring in some countries.

-Main and Solomon identified a fourth category- Type D Disorganised- a mix of resistant and avoidant behaviour. However these babies have usually experienced some form of severe abuse associated with later phsycological disorders. Making Ainsoworths classifications adequate for only normal variations.

63
Q

Italian study- Simonella et al (2014)

A

76 1 year olds using strange situations
50% secure, 36% were IA
A lower rate of secure attachment then in other studies due to mothers working longer hours

64
Q

Korean study-Jin et al (2012)

A

Strange situation used to assess 87 babies
Insecure and secure proportions similar to most countries

65
Q

A03

A

+Indigenous psychologists
Those who had the same culture as the participants. Misconception can be avoided eg language barriers to increase validity.
-Counterpoint of American studies patterns of attachments in Efe of Zaïre could’ve been bias

66
Q

Bowlbys theory of maternal deprivation

A

Developmental impairment that’s caused by being separated from the mother is essential for normal psychological development. Separation could have irreversible social, cognitive and emotional consequences to the child.

67
Q

Separation

A

The child not being in the presence of the primary attachment figure and is being deprived of emotional care

68
Q

Deprivation

A

Separation occurs for long time periods. Long enough for attachment to be severely damaged or completely broken

69
Q

Critical attachment period

A

First 2 years

70
Q

Effects of maternal deprivation on development

A

Abnormally low IQ

71
Q

Bowlby The 44 juvenile thieves aim

A

To investigate the effect of long term separation

72
Q

44 juvenile thieves procedure

A

Case studies on backgrounds of 44 adolescents who had been referred to the clinic where Bowlby worked because they were stealing. They were compared to a control group of 44 adolescents who didn’t steal but were emotionally disturbed. A natural experiment. Thieves were interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy.

73
Q

44 juvenile thieves results

A

17 thieves experiences freq separations from their mother before age of 2, compared with 2 in the control group. 14 of thieves were diagnosed as “affectionless psychopaths” and 12 of these 14 were separated from mothers

74
Q

44 juvenile thieves conclusion

A

Early separations linked to affectionless psychopathy and lack of continuous care causes emotional maladjustments or mental disorders.

75
Q

Influence of early attachment on later relationships

A

Bowlby- when we form out primary attachment we make a mental representation of what a relationship is (internal working model) and use this for future relationships. Eg romantic relationships.

76
Q

Behaviours influenced by the Iwm

A

Childhood friendships- those who are securely attached in infancy score higher for social competency later in childhood. IA =victims, IR= bullies

Poor parenting eg Harlows monkeys

Romantic relationships- haven and shaver

Mental health- lack of attachment in the critical period can result in attachment disorder

77
Q

The love quiz Hazan and Shaver Aims

A

See if there was a correlation between the infants attachment and their future approach to romantic relationships

78
Q

The love quiz procedure

A

Assessed current relationship
General love experiences
Assessed attachment type
In a local newspaper and 620 replies from ppl aged 14 to 82 years. Classified respondents to Ainsworth’s infant attachment types and looked for corresponding adult love types.

Secure types (56%)-love experiences as happy, friendly and trusting- emphasising being able to accept their partner regardless of any faults. Happy depending on others and comfy if others depend on them.

IR types (19%)- obsession, emotional highs and lows, jealousy and desire for intense closeness

IA types (25%)- feared intimacy, uncomfy being close

79
Q

The love quiz results

A

High correlation

80
Q

The love quiz conclusions

A

Evidence to support the concept of IWM having a life-long effect. However, not everyone stayed true to their infant attachment style.

81
Q

The love quiz evaluation

A

Recording their memories of infant experiences and such memories may not always be accurate. Self-selecting and results may be subject to volunteer bias. Self reporting.

82
Q

Evaluation of influence of early attachment on later relationships

A

+Study was deterministic as it suggests our later relationships are always determined by our early experiences

+Supporting evidence: disorganised strongly associated with mental disorder HOWEVER Regensbury longitudinal study (43 from 1 yr old) then at 16 shows no continuity.

-Validity due to being retrospective