Attachment Flashcards

1
Q

2 modes of Caregiver-Infant Interaction

A

Reciprocity = Responding to action of another with similar action

International Synchrony = When 2 people interact they mirror what they are doing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Research into reciprocity

A

Feldman & Eidelman : Babies have “ alert phases” and signal ready for interaction ( mother responds 2/3 of the time).
Babies and carer spend time in pleasurable interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interactional Synchrony

A

Meltzoff & Moore : adult makes 1/3 facial expressions and child reaction recorded.
Showed association between adult and infant behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ao3 of caregiver-infant interaction

A

•unreliable due to infants. Infants pull funny faces often. Unable to conclude imitation.
•research supp. Meltzoff & Morre repeated with 3 day olds and got same results.
•controlled. High valid. Inter rated reliability. Recorded.
•Unethical. Socially sensitive as it can be used to argue against mother returning to work.
•prac app. Crotwell, 10 mins of interaction improved interactional synchrony and used as therapy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Stages of Attachement

A

Asocial (0-6w) : Behaviour to people and objects similar.
Indiscriminate (6w-6m): Preference for humans but not specific humans.
Specific (6m-1y): Stranger & separation anxiety. Attach to primary figure.
Multiple (1year +): Second attachment 29% have within first month of primary attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Stages of Attachment study

A

Schaffer & Emerson
60 Glaswegian babies (working class families)
Visited every month for 12 months and again at 18months.
Interviewed + observed mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Findings & conclusion of Attachment stages study

A

25-32 weeks = 50% separation anxiety
40weeks = 80% specific attachment and 30% multiple.

Conc: Stages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ao3 of stages of attachment

A

•High Ext val. took place in ptsps home. Natural env.
•Lack pop val. only 60 working class babies. Not generalisable.
•Social Desirability bias. Report better info of child to be better mother.
•lack temp val. social roles of men and women loosened.
•low cultural val. Not all babies for specific. In collectivist they form multiple from birth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Schaffer & Emerson findings on role of father

A

Less likely to be primary attachment figure possibly due to less time spent with infant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

General ideas of role of father

A

Lack oestrogen causing inability to form close attachment.

Heerman
Men less sensitive to infant social cues.

Men unable to form attachment due to lack of emotional sensitivity.

Playmate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Arguments of role of father

A

Fathers can demonstrate sensitive responsiveness and respond to needs of child.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ao3 of Role of Father

A

•Res supp. Playmate. Geiger fathers play interactions more fun than with mother.
•Contra res. McCallum & Golombok same sex families don’t develop diff.
•Economic implications. Mother pressured to stay home. Socially sensitive.
•Bio deter. Lower oestrogen. Men bio programmed to not be primary caregiver.
•Ovserver bias. Observer sees what they wish to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Animal Studies
Imprinting
Procedure

A

Lorenz
12 geese. Half hatched with him and half with mother.

Mixed all together and report who they follow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Animal Studies
Imprinting
Findings

A

Incubator group followed Lorenz. Control followed mother

Critical period where imprinting needs to take place. No imprinting = No attachment

Sexual imprinting also occurs. Birds acquire template of desirable characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Animal Studies
Contact comfort
Procedure

A

16 rhesus monkey 2 wire model mothers
1.milk from wire mother
2.milk from cloth covered mother

Preferences measured to frightening situations (noisy teddy bear in environment)
Also continued to study those who deprived real mother.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Animal Studies
Contact Comfort
Findings

A

Baby monkey always preferred soft object to wire. Regardless of which dispense milk.
Contact comfort more important than food.

As monkeys aged deprived ones more aggy less social less skilled and killed their offspring.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Ao3 of Animal Studies

A

•Animal bias. Animals not humans. Not fair to generalise.
•Animals and humans not too different. Provides insight into attachment behaviour.
•Unethical. Caused distress to monkeys. Harlow knew he was wrong calling wire mother Iron Maiden which relates to old torture device.
•Prac app. Helped social workers understand child abuse. And zoos.
•Low int val. confounding variables. Different faces on wire monkey.

18
Q

Learning Theory of Attachment
Classical

A

Attachment through classical conditioning.
Caregiver neutral. Food unconditioned stimulus.
Overtime caregiver associated with food. Now conditioned stimulus.

19
Q

Learning Theory of Attachment
Operant

A

Crying lead to attention from caregiver. Reinforces crying as its consequence is positive.

Caregiver negative reinforcement as baby stops crying.

This relation of pos & neg reinforcement strengthens attachment

20
Q

Ao3 of Learning Theory of Attachment

A

•Contra res. Animal studies didn’t matter who fed them. Fundamentally flawed.
•Env deter. Ignores free will only considering classical and operant.
•Oversimp. Too linear approach. Multi-dimensional needed.
•Animal bias. Skinners pigeons and others generalised to humans.
•Valid explanation. Humans no different from animals.

21
Q

Bs Theory of Attachment

A

Bowlby
Infants born with tendency to form attachment to survive.

Attachment give ADAPTIVE ADVANTAGE increasing survival.

Babies have SOCIAL RELEASERS to signal mother to care for them.

Have to form attachment during CRITICAL PERIOD. Between birth and 2 1/2 years.

Babies need 1 attachment. MONOTROPIC attachment.

This MONOTROPIC attachment builds INTERNAL WORKING MODEL for future relationships.

22
Q

Ao3 of Bs Thoery of Attachment

A

•Supp res. Bailey study 99 mothers found poor attachment with parent lead to poor attachment in child.
•Supp res. Hazen & Shaver. Love quiz pos corr attachment types and love experience. Further supp Internal Working Model.
•Oversimp. More than just IWM effects attachment. Multi needed.
•Ethical issues. Blames mother for poor attachment. Socially sensitive.
•Contra res. Rutted found adopted orphans were still able to form attachments.

23
Q

As Strange Situation
Procedure

A

Ainsworths
100 American infants (9-18months). 7 procedures lasting 3 mins.

1.Infant encouraged to play
2.Stranger enters tries to interact with child.
3.Caregiver leaves and stranger interacts with infant.
4.Caregiver return & stranger leaves
5.Caregiver leave child alone
6.Stranger return interact with child.
7.Caregiver reunited with child

Studied for Proximity seeking.
Exploration & Secure base behaviour
Stranger Anxiety
Separation Anxiety
Response to reunion

24
Q

As Strange Situation

A

Secure 60-75%:willing to explore, moderate sep and stranger anxiety enthusiastic on reunion.

Insecure-Avoidant 20-25%: Very willing to explore. Low sep and stranger anxiety. Avoid reunion.

Insecure-Resistant 3%: Not willing to explore. High sep & stranger anxiety. Reject comfort on reunion

25
Q

Ao3 of As Stange Situation

A

•Inter-rater reliability. No observer bias. Bick 94% agreement in one team
•Culturally bias. Diff cultures have diff ways of raising children. E.g Japan
•Oversimp. Main & Soloman found other attachment types.
•Unethical. Forces children through trauma.
•Prac app. Circle of Security project to teach caregivers. Imp area of app psych.

26
Q

Cultural Variation of Attachment
Procedures

A

Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg
Meta-analysis of 32 studies of strange situation. 1990 children and looked at 3 attachment types.

27
Q

Cultural Variation
Finding

A

Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg
Secure most common 50% China 75% Britain
Indiv cultures insecure-res similar to Ainsworths. Collectivist like china,Japan all above 25%

Variations within same country 150% larger than between countries. US 46% secure and 90% secure in another study

28
Q

Bs Theory of Maternal Deprivation
Study

A

Bowlby’s 44 Thieves Study

29
Q

Bs Theory of Maternal Deprivation
Procedure

A

44 criminal teenagers accused of stealing.
Interviewed for sign of affection less psychopathy.
Families interviewed to see if prolonged early separation from mothers.

30
Q

Bs Theory of Maternal Deprivation
Findings

A

14 of 44 thieves had affection less psychopathy. 12 of 14 had prolonged separation from their mothers in first 2 years of life.
5 of remaining 30 had separation.
In control only 2 of 44 controls had separation.

31
Q

Ao3 of Bs Theory of Maternal Deprivation

A

*Contra res. Replicated and proven otherwise with sample of 500.
*Oversimp. Czexh case study showed effects reversible. Critics period not critical.
*Animal supp. Levy et al rats seperation = Perm damage.
*Animal bias. Animals & humans not the same.
*Real-life app. Lead to social change, kids aren’t left anymore. Parents can visit kids in hospital.

32
Q

Who was used to show Effects of Institutionalisation

A

Romanian Orphans

33
Q

Who studied Effects of Institutionalisation

A

Rutter et al

34
Q

2 Effects of Institutionalisation

A

Disinhibited Attachment - Cupboard love, Child is affectionate toward all.
Damaged Intellectual Development - Signs of Mental retardation, low IQ

35
Q

Effects of institutionalisation
Procedure

A

Rutter et al
165 Romanian Orphans
Longitudinal study test if good care can help poor early experience
Physical,cognitive and emotional development assessed at 4,6,11,15
Control of 52 adopted British children

36
Q

Effects of institutionalisation
Findings

A

Half showed mental retardation
*Adopted before 6m mean IQ 102
*Adopted 6m-2years mean IQ 86
*Adopted after 2y mean IQ 77

Disinhibited attachment - Adopted after 6m = Clingy, Attention Seeking, indiscriminate affection

37
Q

Ao3 of Effects of Institutionalisation

A

*Prac app. Improved institutional care. Imp area of applied psych
*Not generalisable. Roman orphan conditions were terrible. Not applicable to most forms of care.
*Longitudinal study. Large quantity of qualitative data. High int val
*Lack Eco Val. No data for long term effects. Requires further work
*Oversimp. Other factors like lack of cog stimulation and physical deprivation.

38
Q

Who studied early attachment on later relationship

A

Hazen & Shaver

39
Q

How was early attachment on later relationship studied

A

Love Quiz

40
Q

Study of Early Attachment on Later Relationship
Procedure

A

Hazen & Shaver
Analysed 620 results of “Love Quiz” in American news paper, on 3 aspects
1)Respondents’ current & most important relationship
2)General Love Experience
3)Attachment Type

41
Q

Study of Early Attachment on Later Relationship
Findings

A

Hazen & Shaver
56% of respondents identified as securely attached, 25% insecure- avoidant, 19% insecure-resistant

*Secure likely to have good long lasting relationships
*Avoidant jealous and fear intimacy

42
Q

Ao3 of Early Attachment on Later Relationships

A

*Oversimp. Temperament argued more important