Association offences (The Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2010 Flashcards
Who can an Assets forfeiture order be issued by and on what groundS?
Issued by the high court of application
The application must show, on the balance of probabilities, that specific assets which have been acquired have been tainted by significant criminal activity.
What is “tainted property” ?
Any property that has, wholly or in part, been acquired as a result of significant criminal activity or directly or indirectly derived from significant criminal activity.
Includes;
any property that has been acquired as a result of, or directly or indirectly derived from, more than 1 activity if at least 1 of those activities is a significant criminal activity.
What is a qualifying instrument forfeiture offence?
Offence punishable by 5 years imprisonment or more
Including; an attempt, conspiracy or being an accessory if the punishment is more than 5 years.
What is the definition of significant criminal history?
Activity engaged in by a person that if proceeded against as a criminal offence would amount to offending
- That is, or includes, 1 or more offences punishable by a max 5 years imprisonment or
- From which property, proceeds or benefits of a value of $30 000 or more have, directly or indirectly, been acquired or derived
What is the meaning of unlawfully benefited from significant criminal activity?
A person has unlawfully benefited from significant criminal activity if the person has knowingly, directly or indirectly, derived a benefit from significant criminal activity (whether or not that person under took or was involved in the significant criminal activity.)
Section 55 Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) act 2009 stipulates when the high court must make a profit forfeiture order - when is that?
If it is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that
- The respondent has unlawfully benefited from significant criminal activity within the relevant period of criminal activity; and
- The respondent has interests in the property
What is demonstrated in the case of Pulman v the Commissioner of Police?
Whether a person benefited from the activity undertaken.
What is the example provided in Pulman v The Commissioner of Police?
Pulman, a pharmacist, was a party to the production of meth because he was selling precursor substances knowing they were being used to manufacture illicit drugs.
What was argued by Pulman?
Pulman argued that cash had been used to purchase the precursor substances and that cash was used (by his employer) to pay employees so he had not benefited from the sale himself.
What was held in Pulman v The Commissioner of Police?
The court held that the purpose fo the forfeiture was not only to prevent the ability of a person to actually profit from undertaking the significant criminal history but also the “chance” that they may be able to do so and also to deter significant criminal activity. Therefore he had unlawfully benefitted as soon as he had received the cash - how he dealt with it was irrelevant.
What is an instrument of crime?
- Property used (wholly or in part) to commit or facilitate the commission of a qualifying instrument forfeiture offence
- In respect of an offence against the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002, includes funds allocated for the purposes of committing that offence; and
- In relation to any property referred to in para (a) and (b) the proceeds of any disposition of that property or any other property into which that property is converted, after the commission of the qualifying instrument forfeiture offence, except to the extent provided otherwise by any order of a court under this act or the sentencing act. Excluding any severable interest or granting relief.
What does Section 142B of the Sentencing Act 2002 place an obligation on?
It places obligations on the prosecutor to consider notifying the court of any relevant property that is an instrument of crime so that forfeiture of that property can be considered as part of the sentencing process. This could include vehicles and property used to facilitate the commission of an offence.
What is an example of property that the prosecution could notify the court of for consideration into a forfeiture of that property?
- A house used in the manufacture of methamphetamine or a motor vehicle used in the delivery of illegal drugs
What is an example of property that the prosecution may not notify the court of for consideration into forfeiture?
Where an offender uses his old beat up car, worth little, to make his drug deliveries, the prosecutor may think there is no need for the court to consider forfeiture.
What is the definition of a ‘prosecutor’?
A person for the time being in charge of the criminal file and includes:
- Any other employee of the person or agency by whom the prosecutor is employed who has responsibilities for any matter directly connected with the proceedings; and
- Counsel representing the person who commenced the proceedings
- In the case of a private prosecution, the person who commenced the proceedings or counsel representing that person
What are the duties of a prosecutor if the offender is convicted of a qualifying instrument forfeiture offence under S142B Sentencing Act 2002 and any property was used to commit, or to facilitate the commission of that offence?
If, in the prosecutors opinion, the court should consider whether to make an instrument forfeiture order in respect of that property,
The prosecutor must notify the court in writing of
- The details of that property
- The name and identifying details of any person (other than the offender) who, to the knowledge of the prosecutor, has an interest in the property.