Association offences (Accessory after the fact) Flashcards

1
Q

What is the Act and Section for Accessory After the Fact?

A

Section 71 Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Section 71(1) Crimes Act 1961

A

(1) An accessory after the fact to an offence is once who, knowing any person to have been a party to the offence, receives, comforts, or assists that person or tampers with or actively suppresses any evidence against him, in order to enable him to escape after arrest or to avoid arrest or conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the penalty section for accessory after the fact?

A

Section 312 Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the penalty section 312 stipulate?

A

Where no express provision for penalty is made by this act the maximum punishment for an offence of an accessory after the fact is 7 years if the maximum punishment is imprisonment for life and not exceeding 5 years if such maximum punishment is imprisonment for 10 or more years.
In any other case, it’s half the maximum punishment to which he would have been liable if he had committed the full offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What needs to be proved for accessory after the fact?

A
  • That the person who is received, comforted or assisted by the accessory is a party to an offence that has been committed.
  • That at the time of receiving, comforting or assisting that person, the accessory knows that person was a party to the offence.
  • That the accessory received, comforted or assisted that person or tampered with or actively suppressed any evidence against that person.
  • That, at the time of the receiving, comforting or assisting etc, the accessory’s purpose was to enable that person to escape after arrest or to avoid arrest or conviction.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Crooks - what does it state?

A

Knowledge means actual knowledge or belief in the sense of having no real doubt that the person assisted was a party to the relevant offence. Mere suspicion of their involvement in the offence is insufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When must knowledge exist for the person to be an accessory after the fact?

A

At the time of the assistant being given, an accessory must possess the knowledge that:
- An offence has been committed, and
- The person they are assisting was a party to that offence.

Where this knowledge comes after the assistance has been given, they are not liable as an accessory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Briggs - what is stated?

A

As with a receiving charge under s246(1), knowledge may also be inferred from wilful blindness or a deliberate abstention from making inquiries that would confirm the suspected truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When should wilful blindness not be invoked?

A

Wilful blindness (intentional ignorance) should not simply be invoked because the person SHOULD have inquired into the facts, even in circumstances where the person was suspected of having involvement in an offence. To do so would create a situation where knowledge and recklessness are indistinguishable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A person is considered wilfully blind in only two situations, these being:

A
  • Where the person deliberately shuts their eyes and fails to inquire; this is because they knew what the answer would be, or
  • In situations where the means of knowledge are easily at hand and the person realises the likely truth of the matter but refrains from inquiring in order not to know.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Actus Reus of an accessory after the fact?

A

The accessory must do a deliberate intentional act with the purpose of assisting the person to evade justice in one of the three ways.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the five intentional acts to which Accessory After the Fact applies?

A
  • Receives
  • Comforts
  • Assists
  • Tampers with evidence
  • Actively suppresses evidence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What do the five intentional acts to which Accessory after the fact define?

A

These five elements define what a person must do to become an accessory after the fact. There is no requirement that ALL of the five elements are satisfied and it is sufficient where only one is. Therefore the actions performed by an accessory could be captured by one or more of the elements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What must the primary offence be for the defendant to be convicted as an accessory after the fact?

A

The offence must be complete.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Mane - What was stated?

A

To be considered as an accessory, the acts done by the person must be after the completion of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the general definition meant by “Receives, comforts or assists”

A

Receives, comforts and assists are traditional common law terms and in general are not interpreted by the Courts in their literal sense, but are regarded as expressing a general view that the accessory assisted the offender(s) to evade justice, by one means or another.

17
Q

“Receiving or comforting” definition

A

Harbouring an offender or offering them shelter can be considered receiving and/or comforting, e.g. hiding a prison escapee in a basement.

Comforting encompasses situations where an accessory provides an offender with things such as food and clothing.

18
Q

Who cannot be charged with being an accessory after the fact?

A

Receivers of dishonestly obtained property cannot be convicted simply because they received such property. This is because the receiving is not done with a view to assist the offender evade justice. Where you are able to prove this was the intention then this conviction could be recorded.

19
Q

What is the definition of assisting?

A

To assist covers a significant number of situations; providing transport, acting as a look out, identifying someone willing to purchase stolen property as a receiver and deliberately providing authorities with false information as to an offenders whereabouts. Giving advise, information, material or services to the offender is also captured.

20
Q

What does R v Gibbs highlight?

A

The act or acts done by the accessory must have helped the other person in some way evade justice.

21
Q

What is “Tampers with or actively suppresses evidence” defined as?

A

These two elements are more explicit in that they show a requirement for some form of active conduct in respect of the evidence. e.g. the deliberate concealing of evidence or providing false information to police in respect of it are covered by the section, whereas silence or non-disclosure such as failing to report will not attract liability.

22
Q

What does “Tampers” mean?

A

To alter the evidence against the offender.

23
Q

What is an example of tampering with evidence?

A

Modifying an offenders telephone records to conceal communications that might implicate them.

24
Q

What does “Actively suppresses evidence” mean?

A

Concealing or destroying evidence

25
Q

What is an example of Actively suppressing evidence?

A

Bloodied clothing is washed repeatedly to remove evidence or it is set alight to destroy the clothing.

26
Q

What was held in R v Reddy?

A

It is not necessary to prove that what the accused destroyed would have been evidence had it not been destroyed.

27
Q

Can you be charged with attempting to be an accessory?

A

Yes, it is possible.

28
Q

What is the requirement of assistance?

A

There is no requirement that the offender is directly assisted by the accessory.

29
Q

What is an example of indirect assistance?

A

Person A commits an offence and is assisted directly by another accessory. Person B assists person C directly, but does not directly assist person A. Despite this distance, person B is still an accessory after the fact to person A.

30
Q

What if the primary uses an innocent agent?

A

Where an innocent agent is employed by the accessory, the actions of the innocent agent will be held to be the actions of the acessory.

31
Q

What must an accessories intent be?

A

It must be one of the three ways of assistance contained within the statute.

To enable the offender to:
- Escape after arrest
- Avoid arrest
- Avoid conviction

It does not need to be the dominant reason but the intent needs to be present.

32
Q

What is insufficient to be an accessory?

A

Mere knowledge that an act is likely to assist an offender is insufficient in itself - there must be one of the three intents present.

33
Q

What is an example of the accessorys intent not being prominent but nevertheless being present?

A

Where an accessory conceals evidence that would diminish their own chances of apprehension as an accessory as well as them having the intent that it would diminish the chances of the offender being caught.

34
Q

What was found in R v Mane in relation to the principal offence?

A

That an accessory after the fact is entitled to insist on proof that the alleged offence was committed and to challenge that proof.

35
Q

What happens if the offender is acquitted of the primary offence?

A

A person can still be convicted as an accessory after the fact despite the offender having been, or where they may be, acquitted of the offence UNLESS the accessory’s conviction is inconsistent with the acquittal of the original offender.

36
Q

What is the conviction of the accessory after the acquittal of the primary offender reliant on?

A

It is reliant on the state of the evidence and an analysis in order to determine whether differing verdicts are warranted by differing evidence against the accessory and the offender.

E.g. an offender confesses to committing an offence but the confession is ruled inadmissible and results in an acquittal. In the case of the accessory, the confession being ruled is admissible against the accessory and thus a conviction is recorded.

37
Q
A