Arson Flashcards
Section 267 (1)(a) Crimes Act 1961
(1) Everyone commits arson and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years who
(a)
- Intentionally OR recklessly
- Damages by fire OR by means of any explosive
- Any property
- If he or she knows OR ought to know that danger to life is likely to ensue
Section 267(1)(b) Crimes Act 1961
(1) Everyone commits arson and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years who
(b)
- Intentionally OR recklessly
- And without claim of Right
- Damages by fire OR by means of any explosive
- Any immovable property, vehicle, ship or aircraft
- In which that person has no interest
Section 267(1)(c) Crimes Act 1961
(1) Everyone commits arson and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years who
(c)
- Intentionally
- Damages by Fire OR by means of any explosive
- Any immovable property, vehicle, ship or aircraft
- With intent to obtain any benefit OR to cause loss to another person
Section 267(2)(a) Crimes Act 1961
(2) Everyone commits arson and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who
(a)
- Intentionally OR recklessly
- Without claim of right
- Damages by fire OR by means of any explosive
- Any property
- In which that person has no interest (Excluding property referred to in subsections (1))
Section 267 (2)(b) Crimes Act 1961
(2) Everyone commits arson and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who
(b)
- Intentionally OR recklessly
- Damages by fire or by means of any explosive
- Any property (Excluding that which falls under subsection (1))
- With intent to obtain any benefit OR cause loss to any other person
Section 267 (3) Crimes Act 1961
(3) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years who
- Intentionally damages
- By fire OR by means of any explosive
- Any property
- With reckless disregard for the safety of any other property
Section 267 (4) Crimes Act 1961
- What does benefit refer to?
It means any
- Benefit
- Pecuniary advantage
- Privilege
- Property
- Service
- Valuable consideration
Define intent
There are two parts to proving intent.
There must be an intention to commit the act and the intention to get a specific result
Define a deliberate act
This means an act or omission done deliberately. It must be more than involuntary or accidental
Define an “intent to produce a result”
In this context it can mean “Aim, object or purpose”
Who has to prove intent?
The onus to prove intent is on the prosecution to prove an offenders intent beyond reasonable doubt
R v COLLISTER
Circumstantial evidence from which an offenders intent may be inferred can includE:
- The offenders actions and words before during and after the event
- The surrounding circumstances
- The nature of the act itself
Define reckless
Acting ‘recklessly’ involves consciously and deliberately taking an unjustified risk
Reckless case law
Cameron v R & R v TIPPLE
Cameron v R
Recklessness is established if:
(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that
(i) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; and / or
(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed; and
(b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable
R v tipple
General rule that ‘recklessness’ is to be given a subjective meaning. It requires the offender know of or have a conscious appreciation of the relevant risk and it may be said that it requires the decision to ‘run the risk’
When recklessness is an element in an offence, the following must be proved:
- That the defendant consciously and deliberately ran the risk (subjective test)
- That the risk was one that was unreasonable to take in the circumstances as they were known to the defendant (objective test - based on whether a reasonable person would have taken the risk)
What must the prosecution prove for a charge of arson ?
That the specified property has been ‘damaged’ by fire or explosive as a result of the defendants actions.
What is sufficient when proving damage by fire?
Fire damage often involves burning or charring however it does not need to be set alight; melting, blistering of paint or significant smoke damage may be sufficient
R v ARCHER
Property may be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm OR permanent or temporary impairment of its use or value
What is fire the result of?
The process of combustion - A chemical reaction between fuel and oxygen, triggered by heat.
For a fire to start or continue, fuel, oxygen and heat must be present in the correct proportions.
What happens when fuel is heated to its ignition temperature?
It releases gases which then react with ocean molecules in the air - this results in the release of heat and light energy, and various other by products, which are visible as flames
Section 2 Arms Act 1983
Explosive Definition
Define explosive: Paragraph (a)
(a) Means any substance or mixture or combination of substances which in its normal state is capable either of decomposition at such rapid rate as to result in an explosion or of producing a pyrotechnic effect; and
Define explosive: Paragraph (b)
Without limiting paragraph (a) of this definition, includes gun powder, nitroglycerine, dynamite, gun-cotton, blasting powder, fulminate of mercury or of other metals, coloured plates, fog signals, fuses, rockets, percussion caps, detonators, cartridges and ammunition of all descriptions; and
Define explosive: Paragraph (c)
Without limiting paragraph (a) or (b) includes any device, contrivance, or article, which uses any substance or mixture or combination of substances to which paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) of this definition applies as an integral part of it for the purposes of producing an explosion or a ballistic or pyrotechnic effect; but does not include a firearm; and
Define explosive: Paragraph (d)
Does not include any firework as defined in section 2 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996
Define property
Property includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, [Money, electricity,] and any debt, and any thing in action, and any other right or interest
Does ‘property’ include intangible items?
While the statutory definition is wide and includes a range of intangible things, only tangible property is capable of being damaged directly by fire or explosive HOWEVER intangible property may be damaged indirectly
How can intangible property be damaged indirectly?
Information stored on a computer that becomes irretrievable when the computer is damaged by fire
What kind of property does Section 267(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961 cover?
ANY property
Matters such as the nature, value and ownership of the property are not relevant.
It is the risk to another persons life that raises this offending to the highest category of arson
What kind of property does Section 267(1)(b) & (c) Crimes Act 1961 cover?
Only deal with property that is, in general, higher in value (immovable property, vehicles, ships and aircraft)
It is the value of these items that raises the offending to the higher category
What kind of property do s267 (2) and (3) deal with?
Lower-value property - depending on the offenders intent and the risk to other property
“Knows or ought to know” definition
Simester and Brookbanks - suggests knowing means knowing or correctly believing.
What questions do you ask when considering the subjective test for knowing?
What was the defendant thinking at the time?
Did the defendant know that human life was likely to be endangered by his actions?
What must you consider if there is insufficient evidence that the defendant was conscious of the risk?
Consider the objective test:
What would a reasonable person have thought in the same circumstances?
Would a reasonable person have recognised the risk?
“Danger to life” definition?
In this context “Life” refers to human life and the danger must be to someone other than the defendnat
“Claim of right” definition
In relation to this act means a belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed. Although the belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed
What does the defendant have to believe to use claim of right as a defence?
Firstly you must have a belief in a proprietary or possessory right in that there must be a belief that relates to an element of ownership of the property or a right to take or retain possession of it.
Can intangible property with regard to “claim of right” be included?
In appropriate cases, intangible property which cannot be possessed but may be owned can be included
Does the defendant have to believe he or she has possessory right to the property
Arguably the defendant could rely on a belief as to another legal rights
What property must there be proprietary or possessory right?
The property in which the offence is alleged to have been committed
When must the belief be held (possessory right)?
At the time of the alleged offence
Hayes v R
The belief is not required to be reasonably held and may be based on ignorance or mistake. However the reasonable of the belief may be relevant in determining whether the defendants assertion of the belief is credible.
Immovable property defined?
Immovable property is not defined. In general it relates to buildings and land and things growing on land (forests)
It will be considered immovable if it is currently fixed in place and unable to be moved.
Does immovable property include property that can be made movable ?
Yes - a relocatable building which is currently fixed to foundations is ‘immovable’ even though it could be released from its foundations and moved.
Vehicle definition
(a) A contrivance equipped with wheels, tracks or revolving runners on which it moves or is moved and
(b) includes a hovercraft, skateboard, in line skates and roller skates
What does a vehicle not include?
- a perambulator or pushchair
- A shopping or sporting trundler not propelled by mechanical power
- An article of furniture
- A wheelchair not propelled by mechanical power
- Any other contrivance specified by the rules not to be a vehicle for the purposes of this definition
- Any rail vehicle
Ship definition
Means every description of vessel used in navigation, however propelled
What does Ship include?
- barge
- lighter
- dinghy
- raft
- includes any ship belonging to or used as a ship of the armed forces of any country
Aircraft definition
Any machinery that can derive support in the atmosphere from the reactions of the air otherwise than by the reactions of the air against the surface of the earth
R v WILSON
R v Wilson held that a tenancy of a property is sufficiently an interest in that property and therefore they cannot be conicted of arson.
When can a tenant be charged?
Under 267
(a) Where the crown alleges the damage by fire is intentional if he or she has caused loss to any other person
(b) where the crown alleges the damage by fire is either intentional or reckless a tenant may be convicted if he / she knew danger to life would likely ensue
(c) a tenant otherwise cannot be convicted of recklessly damaging the tenanted property by fire
Obtain defined
Means obtain or retain for himself or herself or for any other person
Benefit defined
means any benefit, pecuniary advantage, privilege, property, service or valuable consideration
Can an owner of a house be convicted of arson?
Under S267(1)(c) the owner of a property can be convicted of arson if it was done with intent to obtain a benefit (e.g. a fraudulent insurance claim)
Loss defined
Will involve financial detriment to the victim
R v Morely
Loss is assessed by the extent to which the complainants position prior to the offence has been diminished or impaired
Person definition
Includes:
- the crown and any public body or local authority
- any board, society or company
- Any other body of persons whether incorporated or not
- and the inhabitants of the district of any local authority
If an offender sets fire to a police car, do they commit arson against 267(1)(c) ?
Yes, because they intended to cause loss to the Police as an organisation which under this act is considered a ‘person’.
What kind of property does 267(2) relate to?
Anything OTHER than immovable property, vehicles, ships or aircrafts
Reckless disregard - what do you have to prove in relation to property?
It must be proved that the offender intended to damage property and that there was a risk of damaging other property as a consequence.
What does Section 268 cover?
It covers situations where the offender INTENDS to commit arson and takes steps towards doing so but for whatever reason the full offence is not committed
What must there be evidence of for the offence of attempted arson?
There must be evidence that the offender had the intent to commit the full offence.
Recklessness is insufficient for attempted arson
Section 268 Crimes Act 1961
Everyone is liable for a term not exceeding 10 years who
- Attempts to commit arson
- In respect of any immovable property, vehicle, ship or aircraft
To be guilty of an attempt under S72 Crimes Act 1961 what must you prove?
- That they intended to commit the offence
- That they took a real and substantial step toward achieving that aim.
How close must a defendant be to the actual act in order to be convicted of an attempt?
They must have progressed past the stage of preparation and commenced a process intended to lead to the commission of the full offence
It must be sufficiently proximate to the offence - he must have taken a real and practical step towards the offence
72(a) Crimes Act 1961
Everyone who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his objectives, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not
72(2) Crimes Act 1961
The question whether an act done or omitted with intent to commit an offence is or is not only preparation for the commission of that offence, and too remote to constitute an attempt to commit it, is a question of law
72(3) Crimes Act 1961
An act done or omitted with intent to commit an offence may constitute an attempt if it is immediately or proximately connected with the intended offence, whether or not there was any act unequivocally showing the intent to commit the offence
How will ‘sufficiently proximate’ be determined?
The court will analyse the defendants conduct at the relevant time, in conjunction with evidence of his or her intent based on the circumstances and any steps taken leading up to that point.
This cumulative assessment may allow the court to infer that the defendant had intended to commit the full offence and had started to do so, even though he or she may still have been several steps removed from the ultimate act
R v Harper
The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops. The defendants conduct may be considered in its entirety. Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant though not determinative
What did the courts refer to as examples of acts that may constitute an attempt?
The American model penal code
What did the American model penal code stipulate?
That the defendants actions must be analysed on a case by case basis. However acts that may constitute an offence include:
- Lying in wait, searching for or following the victim
- Enticing the victim
- Reconnoitring the scene of the contemplated crime
- Unlawful entry of a structure, vehicle or enclosure which is contemplated that the crime will be committed
- Possession, collection or fabrication of materials to be employed
- soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the crime
Section 269 Crimes Act 1961
Intentional damage
Section 269 (1) Crimes Act 1961
Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who:
- intentionally or recklessly
- Destroys or damages
- Any property
- If he knows or ought to know that danger to life is likely to result
Section 269 (2)(a) Crimes Act 1961
Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who
(a)
- Intentionally or recklessly
- and without claim of right
- Destroys or damages
- Any property
- In which that person has no interest
Section 269 (2)(b) Crimes Act 1961
Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who
(b)
- Intentionally or recklessly
- Without claim of right
- Destroys or damages
- Any property
- With intent to obtain any benefit or with intent to cause loss to any other person
Section 269(2)(c) Crimes Act 1961
Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who
- Intentionally
- Destroys or damages
- Any property
- With reckless disregard for the safety of any other property
Does S269 cover damage by fire
S269 CAN cover arson however you would more likely to go for the more serious offence (267) and S269 would be reserved for damage caused by other means
Section 272 Crimes Act 1961
Everyone is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years who
- Knowingly
- Has in his / her possession OR makes any explosive substance or any dangerous engine, instrument or thing
- With intent to use or enable another person to use the substance, dangerous engine, instrument or thing to commit an offence
R v HALLAM - possession of explosives etc
On a charge of knowingly having possession of an explosive substance, it must be proved that the offender knowingly had the substance in his possession and also that he knew it to be an explosive substance
What must you prove for an offence against S272 CA 61 (having possession of explosive substances)
- That the offender knowingly had the substances
- That he knew it to be an explosive substance
What is meant by “explosive substance, dangerous engine, instrument” in S 272 CA 61 ?
It is suggested that both ‘engine’ and ‘instrument’ have a special meaning - the nature of a device intended to explode or cause fire or emission of noxious things.
What is meant by ‘Thing’ in S267 CA 61 being providing explosives to commit an offence?
Must be restricted to a similar fashion as the others - intended to explode or emission of noxious things
Possession of explosive or device - allowing someone else to use it - who may they have allowed to use it
- the defendant must intend the explosive or device to be used by another person to commit an offence
- It is NOT necessary that they know the identity of the person who will ultimately use the explosive device or of the precise nature of the offence
Who is responsible for maximising safety and eliminating/minimising risk is the responsibility of:
All police employees, persons engaged by police to provide a service including contractors and their employees, trainees, interns and volunteers
For arson what powers do you have?
Powers of arrest under section 315(2) Crimes Act 1961
Section 88 of the Fire Services Act 1975 covers offenses against alarms, hydrants and impersonating such as :
Under section 88 of the Fire Services Act 1975.
You must prove:
- They unlawfully interfered with any fire alarm OR
- They knowingly covered up, enclosed or concealed any hydrant
- They knowingly obliterated or removed any mark, sign or letter used to indicate the position of, or to distinguish any hydrant
- With intent to deceive, impersonated a member of the fire service or a member of a volunteer fire brigade
Can you arrest for S 88 of the Fire Services Act 1975?
No as the penalty is fine only - serve a summons
Resisting or obstructing the commission (Fire services act)
What must you prove
Section 88 of the Fire Services Act 1975
You must prove:
- The identity of the defendant and that they
- resisted, deceived or knowingly obstructed the Commission or any person in the exercise or attempted exercise of power, performance, or attempted performance of any duty OR
- Unlawfully interfered with any equipment at, or in the vicinity of, a fire, suspected fire or other emergency OR
- Knowingly gave or caused to be given, any false alarm of fire
Can you arrest under S88 Fire Service Act 1975 in relation to resisting or obstructing the commission?
Yes as section 88(1) includes a penalty of imprisonment and you can therefore arrest without warrant under section 88(2)
Section 198(1)(b)&(c) Crimes Act 1961
Doing a dangerous act with intent
You must prove:
with intent to do GBH
b) Send or deliver to any person, or puts in any place, any explosive, injurious substance or device or
c) sets fire to any property
Section 198(2) CrimesAct 1961
Doing a dangerous act with intent
You must prove:
- the identity of the defendant and that they
- With intent to injure OR
- With reckless disregard for the safety of others
- Did any of the acts referred to in section 198(1)
Section 272 Crimes Act 1961
What must you prove?
Providing explosive (or other dangerous item) to commit crime
You must prove:
- The identity of the defendants and that they knowingly
- Had in their possession or made any explosive substance or any dangerous engine, instrument or thing
- With intent to use or enable another person to use the substance, dangerous engine, instrument or thing to commit an offence
What are the police powers and duties while a fire is being fought?
All police present must cooperate with the person in charge of the Fire Service at a fire, suspected fire or other emergency
What are the powers and duties of the person in charge of the Fire Service?
they are charged with direction of operations and confers the right to:
- enter private property when it is on fire or endangered, or when entry is essential to performing a necessary duty (Section 28(4)(b)
- Close roads (Section 28(4)(h)
- Remove vehicles impeding the fire service (Section 28(4)(i)
- Remove people who are in danger or interfering with operations, using reasonable force (section 28(4)(i)
- Do anything else that is reasonably necessary for the protection of life and property (Section 48(4)(n)
What powers may police exercise at a fire?
Police may exercise any powers open to the Fire brigade if they are called upon to do so by a member of the Fire Service in charge of the fire.
They DO NOT have rights to exercise this just because they are at the location of a fire
When will the fire service notify police?
IF:
- A fire results in serious injury or death OR
- a fire is considered suspicious
What is the Fire Investigation Liaison Officer (FILO) role within each police district?
They have the responsibility for:
- Attending every fire that results in serious injury or death
- Co-ordinating fire investigations in their designated area or district
- Arranging Police attendance at fire scenes where required
- Maintaining effective working relationships with the relevant Fire Service Investigation Liaison Officer (FSILO) and Fire Service Specialist Fire Investigators;
- Assisting areas or districts with fire investigation- related queries;
- Ensure communication is maintained with the Police National Fire investigation coordinator, police district Intelligence Manager and District Manager Criminal Investigations, where appropriate
- Co-ordinating fire investigation training for any Police employees within the area or district, where needed
- Providing other advise and expertise as required
Who are Specialist Fire Investigators?
The fire service employs specialist Fire Investigators - they typically possess extensive experience in fire fighting and fire safety and have received specialist training and assessment in fire investigation techniques