Arguments Based On Observation Flashcards

1
Q

What is teleological

A

Final/end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a priori

A

What goes before

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a posteriori

A

What follows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are analytic statements

A

Statements which are true by definition (all bachelors are unmarried men)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are synthetic statements

A

Statements which are not true by definition and must be tested through empirical observation (all bachelors are lonely)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is contingent

A

Something that may or may not happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is necessary

A

Something that must happen (eg, god)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happens if a necessary truth is denied

A

its a contradiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Good way of remembering the argument based on observation

A

Teleological = Telescope = Observe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Where else can the teleological argument be found

A

In Aristotle’s four causes, everything is for a purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the classical design arguments argue

A

The universe has order, purpose and regularity. Complexity of the universe shows evidence of a designer, this is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who wrote the Natural theology

A

William Paley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the two arguments in his book of natural theology

A

Design Qua Regularity
Design Qua Purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is design Qua Regularity

A

Relating to regularity,
The changing seasons, the balance of the food change and how planets rotate, could only come around through design as if one thing was off it wouldn’t work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is deign Qua Purpose

A

Relating to purpose,
The universe can be compared to a machine with each part working together, this machine must have a designer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the 3 scholarly arguments of the teleological argument

A

William Paley, Natural theology
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica
Richard Dawkins, The blind watchmaker

17
Q

What does William Paley argue

A

The watchmaker, if you stumble across something like a watch, it can be argued that it must have a designer as it has details and purpose

18
Q

What does Thomas Aquinas argue

A

An arrow hits a target with no mind of its own, the archer must aim the arrow and shoot. Things that lack knowledge must be moved with something with knowledge, this is God

19
Q

What does Richard Dawkins argue

A

Blind watchmaker, the universe is its own watchmaker and it is all down and due to chance.

20
Q

What is David Hume’s challenge to the teleological argument

A
  1. The universe is ordered but this does not prove a designer
  2. The analogy between the world and a human artefact is weak
  3. Even if we can conclude the world is designed, it may not be the Catholic one
21
Q

The universe is ordered but this does not prove a designer

A
  • The universe may be completely random, e.g. the Epicurean Hypothesis which argues that given enough time and all particles will form something
22
Q

The analogy between the world and a human artefact is weak

A
  • The design argument fails as we cannot compare the world to a machine, because there’s no similarity
23
Q

Even if we can conclude the world is designed, it does not show it was designed by Catholic God

A
  • Humans just don’t have the knowledge to know if it is a religious God
24
Q

Why does Paley’s watch argument fall through

A

Because how can a human creation be compared to one of a God

25
What does John Stuart Mill Criticise
The teleological argument as there's too much evil in the world, therefore God must be imperfect
26
What does Darwinist's challenge
The idea that its evolution not God
27
What is the Anthropic principle
The idea that the world is constructed for intelligent life, put together to counter Darwinists, F.R Tennant claims that the universe allows for the evolution of humans.
28
What is the cosmological argument
The idea that the existence of God comes through the world being perfect
29
What is Aquinas' cosmological argument
The five ways (but just the first three make up the cosmological) - motion - causation - contingency
30
Aquinas motion
Everything is moving and changing, there must be something moving it all, a prime mover
31
Aquinas Causation
Everything has an efficient cause, as something must've created it, there must be a being which started this domino effect
32
Aquinas Contingency
Everything can either exist or not exist, there must be something that rely on existence, this being brought us into it
33
What does Kant criticise about Aquinas
Necessary being makes no sense, we cannot know beyond the empirical world
34
What does Hume reject about the cosmological
We do not have knowledge because we have no experience about the universe. How can we know that the first event caused the second, there's a logical leap (did the brick smash the window?) **This is the Fallacy of composition** as it is not necessary for the universe to have one possible cause. We cannot just guess the cause and effect.
35
What philosophers are in the Arguments based on observation
**Teleological:** William Paley Thomas Aquinas Richard Dawkins David Hume John Stuart Mill **Cosmological:** Aquinas Kant David Hume