Approaches to personality Flashcards

1
Q

Funder’s (1997) definition of personality

A

Pattern of thought, emotion, and behaviour, together with the psychological mechanisms - hidden or not - behind those patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Wilt & Revelle’s (2014) definition of personality

A

Abstractions that explain patterns of Affect, Behaviour, Cognition (and sometimes, Desires)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the overarching approaches to personality?

A

Nomothetic + Idiographic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the nomothetic approach

A

Individual differences can be described explained in terms of predefined attributes
(e.g. everyone is somewhere on extroverted continuum)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What explains the nomothetic approach?

A

Dispositional: personality seen as consistent, independent of situation, an extroverted person will always act so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the idiographic approach?

A

Individuals are so unique that two different people can’t be described using the same concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What explains the idiographic approach?

A

Situational: personality is a series of largely unrelated states, determined by the situation (someone may act extroverted because they are with their friend)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What do dispositional theorists say about the role of context in behaviour

A
  • Don’t deny the role
  • sig correlation between traits and behaviour
  • Traits influence types of situations encountered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The 4 Temperaments (Galen, AD 130-200)

A
  • Early model of personality
  • Balance of bodily fluids determines balance of temperaments
  • Melancholic (depressed
  • Choleric (angry)
  • Sanguine (happy)
  • Phlegmatic (calm)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Eysenck’s initial PEN theory (1947)

A
  • Two dimensions of personality (super traits) where everyone can be placed
  • Extraversion - Introversion
  • High neuroticism - low neuroticism
  • Biological approach
  • Complete description of someone’s personality
  • Scores on these traits are normally distributed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3rd Dimension PEN theory (1970s)

A
  • Observed emotionally unstable individuals with lower levels of fear and anxiety, lack of remorse or conscience and lack of appreciation of consequences
  • This added a psychoticism dimension
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the psychoticism dimension involve

A
  • Highly unempathetic, aggressive, cold and creative
  • Low levels of altruism, conformism, rationalism, patience and unorganised
  • Not normally distributed
  • Not independent of neuroticism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Biological explanation of extraversion-introversion

A
  • Differential activity levels in reticulo-cortical system
  • The ARAS in brain stem modulates amount of electrical activity in the cortex
    Extraverts: lower levels of cortical arousal
    Introverts: higher levels of cortical arousal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What would an EEG see for extraversion + introversion

A
  • Lower cortical arousal (extraversion): lower frequency, higher amplitude EEG traces
  • Higher cortical arousal (introversion): higher frequency, lower amplitude EEG traces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Galen (1983) find when reviewing the biological explanation for extraversion-introversion

A
  • Mixed evidence, majority support it though
  • Methodological issues: unsystematic use of personality measures, v high/low arousal level of task will cause ppl to adapt to preferred level of cortical arousal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is neuroticism explained biologically?

A

By differential activity levels in the reticulo-limbic system
- The limbic system is involved in emotional processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Evaluation of 3rd dimension PEN theory

A
  • Good cross-cultural evidence
  • But psychoticism factor less accepted and not featured in other models
18
Q

What is Behavioural Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (Jeffery Gray)

A
  • Alternative to Eysenck PEN theory
  • Based on animal studies
  • Involves BAS and BIS (they dictate our responses in any given situation)
  • Strong biological component
19
Q

What is BAS (Behavioural Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory)

A
  • Behavioural Activation System
  • Activates approach behaviour towards goals (go signal)
  • Motivated to seek reward
  • Based on conditioned responses associated with positive events
20
Q

What is BIS (Behavioural Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory)

A
  • Behavioural Inhibition System
  • Focuses attention on potential costs
  • Inhibits behaviours associated with negative events
  • Motivated to avoid harm and punishment
21
Q

What did Gray propose were the 2 dimensions to personality?

A

Anxiety + Impulsivity

22
Q

What is the Lexical Hypothesis?

A
  • All aspects of personality can be described from single words used in language
  • Frequency of words corresponds with importance
23
Q

What did Allport & Odbert (1936) do?

A
  • Collected personality items from Webster’s dictionary referring to behavioural differences
  • Removed terms relating to cognitive, physical or transient states
24
Q

What did Allport & Odbert (1936) find? (dictionary)

A
  • Overlap in meaning of terms
  • 4500 terms likely represent smaller number of distinct traits
25
What is a latent variable?
One that can't be observed
26
What type of variable is extraversion?
A latent variable
27
What does psychometrics mean?
The scientific measurement of psychological variables
28
What is Factor analysis?
- A multivariate data reduction technique - Looks for the set of 'latent variables' that best account for the pattern of correlation within the dataset - Statistical technique
29
What did Raymond Cattell (1905-1998) do?
- Made groups of synonyms & pairs of antonyms - Selected exemplar from each & got 171 terms - 100 ppl rated someone on all 171 terms
30
What did Raymond Cattell find? (synonyms & antonyms)
- Examined correlations to find 60 clusters - Narrowed down to 45 terms - Factor analysed data relating to 45 surface traits using self- and other ratings & test performance - Identified 16 personality factors + listed in order of importance
31
What were the 16 personality factors? (Raymond Cattell)
Reserved - Warm Abstract - Concrete Reactive - Emotionally stable Deferential - Dominant Serious - Lively Expedient - Rule conscious Shy - Socially bold Utilitarian - Sensitive Trusting - Vigilant Practical - Imaginative Forthright - Private Self assured - Apprehensive Traditional - Open to change Group oriented - Self reliant Tolerates disorder - Perfectionist Relaxed - Tense
32
Good points of Cattell's 16 personality factors
- Methodical, data-driven approach - Promoted use of factor analysis in personality research - They're still used - Formed basis of 'Big 5' Models
33
Bad points of Cattell's 16 personality factors
- Subjective and arbitrary - Many failures to replicate 16 factor structure - Is 16 too many? - Correlations between factors meaning they're not independent
34
Costa and McCrae's Big Five
- 5 Factors are necessary and reasonably sufficient for describing major features of personality at a global level - Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness - Each super trait has 6 facets measured on a scale
35
Block (1995) critique of the Big 5
- The factor analysis could've resulted in different solutions depending on how many, and which variables were entered - Single words insufficient to describe personality - Over reliance on lay persons - Simple correlations don't capture full complexity of relationships between terms - Random choice for 6 facets per factor - Some important factors not represented (narcissism)
36
Evidence for cross-cultural stability of the Big 5 factors
Thalmayer & Saucier (2014): measurement invariance across 26 nations
37
Emerging evidence for biological basis of personality
Cukic & Bates (2014): openness associated with increased ANS activation at rest
38
Eysenck's conflicting view with Big 5
- Openness is intelligence, not personality - Agreeableness is just low psychoticism, low neuroticism and high extraversion
39
2 Other big trait models
Alternative big 5 (Zuckerman et al., 1999) HEXACO (Lee & Ashton, 2004)
40
Zuckerman's alternative big 5
Impulsive unsocialised sensation seeking, Agression-hostility, Activity, Sociability, Neuroticism-anxiety