Approaches Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition of psychodynamic approach

A

Any theory that emphasises individual change + development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Freud’s role

A

Argued that behaviour is due to psychological factors (mind) and developed psychoanalysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Psychoanalysis

A

Talking therapy dealing with conflicts of the mind. Once resolved, individual ‘mentally healthy’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Unconscious mind

A

Freud argued :
- aware of conscious mind (top of iceberg)
- mind mostly made up of unconscious mind + unaware of, controls everyday action
- UM thought to be shown in behaviour + contains threatening/disturbing memories been repressed (forgotten about)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tripartite system

A

The ID
The Ego
The Superego

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The ID

A
  • Primitive part of personality
  • Present at birth + formed at 18 mths
  • Operates on pleasure principle (selfish+needs instant gratification of needs)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The Ego

A
  • Develop between 18 mths - 3 yrs
  • Operates on reality principle
  • Mediator between ID and Superego (reduce conflict of demands ID Superego)
  • Defence mechanism ( ego protection to prevent nether force is dominant)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Superego

A
  • internalised sense of right/wrong
  • develops between 3-6 yrs (formed at end of phallic stage)
  • operates on morality principle ( represents moral standard of child’s same sex parent + punished the ego for wrongdoing)
  • strives for ego ideal (determined by strict parenting)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Defense Mechanisms (job)

A
  • distort reality to reduce anxiety ( as it weakens ego = can’t meditate between ID and Superego)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

3 Defence Mechanisms

A

Repression - blocking unpleasant memory
Denial - Refusal to accept reality
Displacement - redirecting emotions onto neutral objects/people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Psychosexual stages

A
  • instincts control UM = dictating stages we experience
  • Underlying drive is sexual (pleasure comes from the release of the tension due to the build-up of sexual energy)
  • the stage controls what pleasure is manifested
  • strict parenting vs overindulgence in each stage can cause fixation
  • each stage has a conflict child must resolve to progress successfully to next stage (if unresolved, child is ‘stuck’ in s stage, leading to certain behaviors and conflicts from stage carried to adult life)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Opedius Complex

A
  • Phallic stage - boys develop incestuous feelings to mother and murderous hatred to mother’s rival in love (father)
  • fear of father castrating them, boys repress feelings to mother + identify with gather, taking on gender role and moral values
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Electra Complex

A
  • Penis envy - desire their father as penis is primary love object and hate mother
  • give up desire for father over time and place with desire with one for baby, identifying with mother in process
    (Freud less clear on girl process)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Psychodynamic Approach - Evaluation (Determnistic)

A

P - PA is deterministic
E - s all human behav caused by unconscious conflicts - can’t be controlled
E - removes notion of free will = s people don’t have choice over behav
I - against beliefs widely held about decisions indvid make + may mean people aren’t accountable for behav as society would like them to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Psychodynamic Approach Evaluation ( falsified)

A

P - PA can’t be falsified
E - Eg ID and Opedius complex said to occur at unconscious level = difficult to test
E - means PA classed as pseudoscience
I - reduces credibility to explain human behav

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Psychodynamic Approach Evaluation (Research Methods)

A

P - RM can be criticised
E - F’s theory based on intensive study of single indiv (Little Hans) in therapy
E - questions accuracy of theory + approach = findings from case studies cant be applied to everyone
I - limits useful of PA to explain human behav

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Behaviourist Approach Defintion

A

A way to explain behav in terms of what is observable + in terms of learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Classic conditioning

A

Learnt by association - 2 stimuli constantly paired ( UCS and new NS - NS soon produce same response as UCS alone)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Operant conditioning

A

Learnt by reinforcement- behav shaped + maintained by consequence ( positive/negative reinforcement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Reinforcement

A

Consequence of behav increasing likelihood of behaviour being repeated (pos/neg)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Behaviourist assumptions

A
  • behav learnt from experience ( humans r ‘tabular rasa’ + learn from classical/ operant conditioning)
  • interested in studying behav can be observed/measured
  • lab exper to try gain more control + objectivity in research
  • basic processes govern learning r same in all species ( human can replace animal testing)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Operant Conditioning - 3 consequences

A

Pos reinforcement- reward after certain behav performed
Neg reinforcement- avoidance of unpleasant stimuli viewed as punishment
Punishment- unpleasant consequence of behav

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

UCS

A

Stimuli cause reflex/natural response before conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

UCR

A

Innate reflexive to stimuli - not conditioned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

NS

A

No response by stimuli alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

CS

A

From NS + after repeated paring with UCS produce CS when NS alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

CR

A

Reflexive response occurred after exposure to CS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Behaviourist Approach Evaluation ( Ethical issues)

A

P - EI with using animals in research
E - Skinner exposed animials to stressful/adverse condition (giving shocks)
E - not protecting from harm (against ethical guidelines)
I - harm may not be necessary as some psychs argue can’t generalise finding from animal research = humans may learn + respond to conditioning different

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Behaviourist Approach Evaluation (deterministic)

A

P - highly deterministic
E - s all actions r determined by past experiences that have been conditioned
E - ignored possible influence free will may have on behav
I - problematic = s people rnt responsible for their behav

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Behaviourist Approach Evaluation (scientific credibility)

A

P - scientific credibility
E - brought language + methods of natural science to psych + focused on measurement of observable behav
E - meant research was objective + could be replicated
I - as result, approach was hugely influential in development of psych as scientific discipline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Social Learning Theory

A

A way of explaining including both direct and indirect reinforcement, combining learning theory with role of cognitive factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

imitiation

A

copying other’s behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Role Model

A

Observer associates themselves with role model and wants to be like role model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Modelling

A

Imitating behav of role model/ modelling precise demonstration of specific behav might be imitated by observer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Meditational processes

A

cognitive factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Retention

A

how well behav is remembered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Attention

A

extent to which certain behv r noticed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Motor reproduction

A

Ability of observer to peform behav

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Motivation

A

will to peform behav, often determined by if behav is rewarded/punished

39
Q

Vicarious reinforcement

A

Reinforcement - isn’t directly experienced but occurs thro observing someone else being reinforced for behav

40
Q

SLT assumptions

A
  • behav learnt from envir
  • behav learnt directly thro operant/classical conditioning others + indirectly thro observing others
41
Q

To learn form role model to occur, observer must

A
  • Pay attention to behav
  • must retain behav
  • behav must be able to be reproduced by observer
  • must be motivateed to perform behav based on vicarious reinforcement
42
Q

Bandura’s experiment

A

Aim- demonstrated aggression can be learnt thro modelling
Method - 72 kids (3-6yrs) put in 1/3 group for 10 min with equal n.o of boys/girls, half saw male model + other half saw female model.
Aggressive model - adult hit + shouted at doll when playing
Non-aggressive model - adult played quietly when playing
Control - didn’t see a model
Later observed child alone in room for 20 min with aggressive/non-aggressive toys with doll
Results- kids with agress model = < agress acts than other groups, boys imitated same-sex models more than girls, girls imitate < physical agress when seeing male models
Conclusion - agress can be learnt tho modelling

43
Q

SLT evaluation (Comprehensive expla )

A

P - more comprehensive expla of human learning
E - =recogises role of mediational processes
E - earlier LT (e.g behaviorism) criticized for failing to acknowledge role of these processes, espe in human learning
I - therefore less reductionist view of behav

44
Q

SLT Evaluation (Ignores biological factors)

A

P - underestimates influence of biological factors on learning
E - consistent finding in bandura’s research was boys < agress than girls despite specifics of experimental situation
E - explained by hormonal factors like higher levels of testosterone in boys - not accounting in SLT
I- reduces validity of research, limits evidence supporting approach

45
Q

SLT Evaluation (Lab study over reliance)

A

P - over-reliance on lab studies to provide support for research
E - In B’s experiments kids observed in control setting so many responded to demand characteristics (doll is meant to bounce back once struck)
E - Children may be doing what they believed was expected of them
I - research tells little of how kids learn agress in everyday life, limiting applicability of approach

46
Q

Wundht

A
  • father of psychology (moved broader
    philisophical roots to modern scientific psych)
  • first psychology lab in germany 1870
  • promoted use of introsepction to study mental processes
  • def introspection
  • experience analysed in terms of component terms
  • work paved way for later controlled research + study of mental processes for cognitive psych
47
Q

Introspection

A

1st systematic experimental attempt to study mind by breaking conscious awareness into basic structures of thoughts, images and sensations

48
Q

Wundht evaluation ( scientific methods)

A

P - methods scientific
E - e.g recorded introspec on controlled lab envir with same stimulis + standardised procedure so all particp got same info + testing
E - can be argued not = w relied on partic self report private mental processes = subjective + not reveal some thoughts = doesnt meet scientific enquiry criteria

49
Q

Wundht evaluation (important contribu)

A

P - paved for layer controlled research
E - e.g introspec lef to mental processes study by cogn psych and cog neuroscience leading disciples in psych present
E - great contribution to psych now + increases reliability and shows applicability to real life

50
Q

Psychology def

A

Scientific study of human midn and functions, espec functions affecting behav in certain context

51
Q

Science def

A

Way to acquire knowle thro systematic + objective investig = aim to discover general lawss

52
Q

Watson

A
  • Criticised intro for subjectivity as difficult to establish general princi
  • restricting itself only to studying phenomenon that’s measured + observed
  • scientific processes ( e.g lab exper with control, reliabilith and validity)
53
Q

Cognitive approach

A

Focused on how mental processes like thoughts impact behav

54
Q

Internal mental processes

A

Private operations of mind like attention that mediates between stimuls snd response

55
Q

Schema

A

Mental framework of beliefs + explanations influence cognitive processing - developed from experience (organise + interpret info in brain)

56
Q

Inferences

A

Cognitive psychs draw conclusions about way mental processes operate on basis of observed behav

57
Q

Cognitive neuroscience

A

Scientific study of biological structures underpinning cognitive processes

58
Q

CA assumptions

A
  • mind actively processes info from senses
  • internal mental processes can, shoudl be studied scientifically
  • meditational processes occur between stimulus and response (between mind input and ouput of human behav)
  • humans r info processes = resemble computers (info transformed, stored + retrieved from mem)
59
Q

Role of schema

A
  • more detailed + sophisticated with age
  • shortcut interpreting large amounts of info = prevent being overwhelming by environmental stimuli - lead to perceptual errors and stereotypes as assumptions bout people based on incomplete info as schema distort interpret of sensory info
60
Q

Models + cognitive processing

A

Develop model to study internal process
- theoretical models suggest info flows thro sequence of stages including input, storage + retrieval (MSM)
- computer models =computer programme imitating human mind ( to test whether ideas about info processing is correct) - useful in development artificial intelligence

61
Q

Emergence of cognitive neuroscience

A
  • neuroscientist study living brain using brain imaging tech like PET (help psychs understand neurologisal basis of
    mental processing)
  • focus of CN expands to include computer generate models designed to read brain = led to brain fingerprinting
  • predicted to be used to analyse brain wave patterns of eyewitnesses to detect lies
62
Q

Cognitive approach (scientific methods)

A

P - CA employs highly confolled + rigorous study methods allow psychs infer cogn process that work
E - methods like lab exper = reliable + objective data (Petrerson x2 - memory duration)
E - high level artificiality = controlled extranous variables. Specific data, can be replicated
I - valid data + trusted, increase support of CA

63
Q

Cognitive approach (appliaction to everyday life)

A

P - difficult to apply research to everyday life
E - making inferences about cog process involves some degree of subj judgement of abstarct concept + exper with artifical stimuli
E - approach’s reseach lack external validity
I - research limits usefulness of CA

64
Q

Cognitive approach (treatment application)

A

P - used in physiological disorder treatment
E - explain why some more vulnerable ti depression than others - person’s congitions cause it
E - led to development of succesful treatment (CBT)
I - CA improved lives of many suffering from illness e.g depression

65
Q

Biological approach

A

View emphasising importance of physical body processes e.g genetic heritance

66
Q

Genes

A
  • Make chromosomes + consist of DNA (codes physical features of organism + psychological feautures)
  • Transmitted from parents to offspring
67
Q

Biological structure

A

Arrangement of parts to form organ, system or living thing

68
Q

Neurochemistry

A

Relating to chemicals in brain to regulate psychological functioning

69
Q

Genotype

A

Particular set of genes a person possesses

70
Q

Phenotype

A

Characteristics of indiv determined by both genes + envir

71
Q

Evolution

A

Changes in inherited characteristics in biological popul over successive generations

72
Q

Biological approach assumptions

A
  • everything psychological is biological = understand human behav, first look at biological process + structures
  • mind lives in brain so thoughts etc have physical basis
73
Q

Why is there never 100% concordance rates ?

A

No behav purely due to genetic - always has some element of environ involved

74
Q

If mz twins have hugher concorsance rates than DZ..,,

A

Suggest characteristics investigated have genetic basis

75
Q

What r mz and dz twins

A

Mz - identical
Dz - non identical

76
Q

Concordance rates

A

Extent to whcih same characteristics r shared between people

77
Q

Shred DNA of parents, siblings, DZ and MZ

A

Parents, siblings and DZ= 50%
MZ = 100%

78
Q

Natural selection

A

Any genetically determined behav enhances as indiv’s survival + reproduction continue in further gener (traits r advantageous) - biologial psychs interested in innate human behav + cause of evolution of them in humans

79
Q

Twin studies on genes

A

Determine likelyhood that certain traits have genetic basis by comparing concordance rates

80
Q

Biological approahc evaluation (scientific methods)

A

P - use scientific methods
E - uses experimental methods as main method of investi ( involves highly controlled + sophisticated imaging + recording techniques , inclduing PET scans)
E - experimental studes easy to replicate = consistent results so validty to original findings if reproduced

81
Q

Biological approach (reductionist)

A

P - limitation is reductionist
E - explains behav due to genes, hormo + neurotransmitters but ignores congitive + environment factors
E - e.g BA explains OCD due to low levels of serotonin only
E - other factors contribute to OCD and biological factors don’t consider them

82
Q

Biological evaluation ( casual conclusions)

A

P - BA imply causal conclusions when findings based on correlations
E - explains mental illnesses causes like OCD thro defiency in certain brian neurotransmitters as drugs increase/decrease neurotransmitter , reducing symptoms in sufferer
E - discovering association doesn’t mean 1 of 2 factors are caused by other
I - limits approach due to decreased validity

83
Q

Humansim

A

Undertsanding behav emphasising importance of subjective experience + each person’s capaicty for self determination

84
Q

Humanism beleives humans r

A

Active agents with abiligty to determine own development (free will)

85
Q

Humanism assumptions

A

Reject scientific models + attempt to establish general principles of human behav

86
Q

Self actualisation

A

Desire to grow psychologically + fulfill onez’s potential

87
Q

Hierarchy of Needs

A

Basic needs before higher psychological needs can be ahcieved
1. Physiological needs ( food, water, oxygen)
2. Safety needs ( security, protection, stability)
3. Belonging needs (family, friends, love, partners)
4. Self esteem ( self repsect, status, perception of ability)
5. Self actualisaion (realising full potential)

88
Q

Congruence

A

Self concept + ideal self broadly match

89
Q

Conditins of worth

A

Parents places ljmits/boundaries on love for kids

90
Q

Roger argues…

A
  • personal growth achieved once congruence achieved (ideal self = sef image)
  • < big gap between 2 selves, incongruence state + self actualision not possible = neg feelings of self worth arise from incongruence
  • issues of low self esteem on adults rooted from childhood thro lack of unconditional pos regard
91
Q

Client centred therapy

A
  • reduce gap between self concept + ideal self
  • indiv expert of own conditons
  • non directive = client encouraged to discover own solution with theraputic atmosphere of support + non judgment
  • increase persons feeling of self worth, reduce incongruence + helo person be more fully functioning person
92
Q

Rogerian therapist must provide client with 3 things :

A
  • genuineness, empathy, unconditional pos regard
93
Q

Humanism evaluation (holist)

A

P - reject any attempt to break behav + experience into smaller component
E - advocate hoism (idea that subj experience only understood by considering whole person
E - may have < validity than alternatives by considering meaningful humman behav wihtin its real life contexts
I - increases applicability

94
Q

Humanism evaluation (untestable concepts)

A

P- humanist psyhc includes n.o of vague abstract ideas = difficult to test
E - concepst like self actualisation useful therapeutic tools but prove problematic to assess under experimental conditions
E - approach anti-scientific, humanist psych short on empirical evidence to support claims
I - reduces validity

95
Q

Humanist evaluation (cultural bias)

A

P - many ideas central to humanist psych like indiv freedom more readily associated with individualist cultures
E - collectivist cultures like india, emphasising needs of groups, community + interdependence, may not identify easily
with ideal + values of humanistic psych
E - possible that approach is product of cultural context within, which it was developed + not generalisable to other cultures
I - reduces of applicability of approach

96
Q

Schema in babies + adults

A

Adults - mental representations of everything they experienced
Babies- simple motor Chema for innate behav like sucking