Aphasia - Definitions Flashcards

1
Q

Major distinctions between aphasia and disorders that resemble it (Darley, 1982)

A

Aphasia is language specific, aphasia is not a speech disorder, aphasia is not modality bound, does not relate to the etiology of brain damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Schuell & Jenkins, 1959

A

• The core deficit in aphasia is a unitary, underlying language deficit, best described along a severity continuum rather than a linguistic one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Wepman & Van Pelt (1955)

A

the same neural structures perform symbolic and transmission functions, but functions can be differentiated based on symptoms (aphasia vs. apraxia/agnosia)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Brown (1968)

A

Central Language Processor (CLP): three-level speech and language processing mechanism
o CLP must have
 Access to semantic lexicon, grammar of language
 Ability to store sufficient amount of incoming language to process/recall in the absence of the signal
 Capacity to continuously select most important information from continuous flow of competing internal thought/external stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hageman, McNeil, Rucci-Zimmer, & Cariski, 1982

A

o Performance in aphasia is variable not only across days/testing sessions, but can be minute to minute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Miyake, Carpenter, & Just, 1994

A

o Normal to aphasia continuum – people without aphasia can be made to perform like PWA under certain circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Linebaugh, Coakley, Arrington, & Racy, 1979

A

o Aphasia can be transient: secondary to epilepsy, can be exacerbated by or only observed following seizure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Utman, Blumstein & Sullivan 2001

A

o PWA exhibit priming effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Helm-Estabrooks, 2002

A

o Evidence that severity of linguistic deficits cannot be predicted based on the severity of non-linguistic cognitive deficits, and/or vice-versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Murray, 1999

A

o The relationship between language and non-linguistic aspects of cognitive is varied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

many agree that PWA exhibit limited resources and/or disrupted resource allocation

A
o	McNeil, Odell, & Tseng (1991)
o	Caplan & Waters (1995)
o	LaPointe & Erickson (1991)
o	Murray, Holland & Beeson (1997)
o	Tseng, McNeil, & Milenkovic (1993)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Attention theoretical papers

A
o	McNeil (1983)
o	McNeil, Odell, & Tseng (1991)
o	Hula & McNeil (2008)
o	Murray (1999, 2002, 2012)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attention empirical papers

A
o	Hula & McNeil (2008)
o	LaPointe & Erickson (1991)
o	Tseng, McNeil, & Milenkovic (1993)
o	Murray, Holland, & Beeson (1997)
o	King & Hux (1996)
o	Murray (2000)
o	Heuer & Hallowell (under revision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

WM theoretical papers

A

o Just & Carpenter (1992)
o Caplan & Waters (1995, 1999)
o Wright & Shisler (2005)
o Wright & Fergadiotis (2012

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

WM empirical papers

A
o	Miyake, Carpenter, & Just (1994)
o	Caspari, Parkinson, LaPointe, & Katz (1998) 
o	Sung et al. (2009)
o	Christensen & Wright (2010)
o	Friedman & Gvion (2003)
o	Ivanova & Hallowell (2012)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Aphasia as disorder of symbolic function/thinking/expression

A
  • Head (1926)
  • Jackson (1931)
  • Darley (1982
17
Q

Aphasia caused by brain damage

A
  • Schell (1959)
  • Chapey (1981)
  • Darley (1982)
  • McNeil (1982)
  • Goodglass & Kaplan (1983)
  • Rosenbeck, LaPointe, & Wertz (1989)
  • Hallowell & Chapey (2008)
18
Q

Aphasia involves receptive and expressive language

A
  • Chapey (1981)
  • Goodglass & Kaplan (1983)
  • Rosenbeck, LaPointe, & Wertz (1989)
  • Hallowell & Chapey (2008)
19
Q

Aphasia as a multimodality language impairment

A
  • Chapey (1981)
  • Darley (1982)
  • McNeil (1982)
  • Rosenbeck, LaPointe, & Wertz (1989)
  • Hallowell & Chapey (2008)
20
Q

Aphasia does not involve underlying intellectual deficits

A
  • Darley (1982)
  • Rosenbeck, LaPointe, & Wertz (1989)
  • Hallowell & Chapey (2008)
21
Q

Aphasia involves cognitive processing underlying language

A
  • Chapey (1981)
  • McNeil (1982)
  • Rosenbeck, LaPointe, & Wertz (1989)
22
Q

Aphasia: competence vs performance distinction

A
  • Darley (1982) – acknowledged both

* McNeil (1982)