AP Notes 281-300 Flashcards

1
Q

V-to make worse or more severe

A

Exacerbate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Adj-harmful, injurious

A

Noxious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When one kind of sensory stimulus evokes the subjective experience of another. Seeing red fire ants makes you itchy. Refer to Red Hot Chili Peppers Taste the Pain

A

Synesthesia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A declaration that is made emphatically as if no supporting evidence were necessary

A

Assertion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A literary device used by writer for a prominent character in a play or book that has characteristic opposite to a conventional hero. The protagonist is generally admired for his bravery, strength, charm, or ingenuity, while typically clumsy, unsolicited, unskilled, and has good and bad qualities.

Dexter is a good example

A

Anti-Hero

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Adj-harmful, injurious

A

Noxious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When one kind of sensory stimulus evokes the subjective experience of another. Seeing red fire ants makes you itchy. Refer to Red Hot Chili Peppers Taste the Pain

A

Synesthesia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A declaration that is made emphatically as if no supporting evidence were necessary

A

Assertion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A literary device used by writer for a prominent character in a play or book that has characteristic opposite to a conventional hero. The protagonist is generally admired for his bravery, strength, charm, or ingenuity, while typically clumsy, unsolicited, unskilled, and has good and bad qualities.

Dexter is a good example

A

Anti-Hero

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Adj-harmful, injurious

A

Noxious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When one kind of sensory stimulus evokes the subjective experience of another. Seeing red fire ants makes you itchy. Refer to Red Hot Chili Peppers Taste the Pain

A

Synesthesia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A declaration that is made emphatically as if no supporting evidence were necessary

A

Assertion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A literary device used by writer for a prominent character in a play or book that has characteristic opposite to a conventional hero. The protagonist is generally admired for his bravery, strength, charm, or ingenuity, while typically clumsy, unsolicited, unskilled, and has good and bad qualities.

Dexter is a good example

A

Anti-Hero

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

An element of a culture or system of behavior that may be considered to be passed from one individual to another by non-genetic means, especially imitation; a humorous image, video, piece of text, etc., that is copied (often with slight variation) and spread rapidly by internet users.

A

Meme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Writing or any type of writing for that, there are three types of claims a writer can make. These 3 are claims of fact, value, and policy. We will look at each separately. It is important to identify these in the writing of others (especially rhetorical and synthesis) and to use them appropriately in your own writing in the synthesis and argumentative writing on the AP exam.

A

Types of “Claims” in argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Existence of something/definition or classification interferences about past, present, or future

Types of factual claim (generally objective)

  • factual/historical
  • relational-casual connection
  • predictive
Prop for this type of claim require:
1- sufficient and appropriate grounds
a) reliability
b) recent data
c) accurate, typical data
d) clearly defined terms-no loaded language

2- a clear distinction between fact and interference.

A

Claims of Fact

17
Q

(Tastes and morals) and such claims then to make value judgements, resolves conflicts between values/quasi policy (meaning the rights or appropriateness of it;) relative merits, etc. the proof for such claim is not as solid as “claims of fact”

a) establish their own standards of evaluation (ie, a warrant that defines what constitutes instances of relevant value) As such, the writer defines good, bad, and not much room for rebuttal
b) note the priority of their established value
c) establish the value or advantage
d) use examples to clarify abstract values
e) use credible authority for support

A

Claims of Value