Animal Studies Flashcards
Lorenz: Procedure
- Clutch of geese eggs
- Half went to mum goose
- Half went to an incubator to immediately see Lorenz after hatching
Lorenz: Findings
- Both groups followed their relative leader
- Lorenz group showed no recognition for its natural mother
- Developed this imprinting in the critical period
Lorenz: Long lasting effects
- Process is irreversible
- One goose slept on Lorenz’ bed every night
- Early imprinting had an effect on later mate preferences. Birds will choose to mate with the same species they imprinted on
Harlow: Procedure:
- Two wire monkey mothers: one cloth and one wire
- Eight infant monkeys were studied
- Four monkeys had milk on wired, four had milk on cloth
- Observations were made on how much time each monkey spent with each mother and when the monkey was frightened
Harlow: Findings
- All monkeys spent more time with the cloth monkey, regardless of feeding bottle
- When scared, all monkeys went to the cloth monkey
- When playing, all monkeys kept a foot on the cloth monkey for reassurance
Harlow: Long lasting effects
- Motherless monkeys developed abnormally - couldn’t build relationships or mate with any other monkeys
- He found a critical period for these monkeys
Lorenz: A03: Research support for imprinting
Research support for imprinting:
Guiton: chicks imprinted to rubber gloves due to being fed for the first few weeks. Guiton also found that later the male chickens tried to mate with the gloves.
Lorenz: A03: Critisism of imprinting
Critisism of imprinting:
He thought it was an irreversible process . However, Guiton reversed the chickens imprinting and they were able to engage normally with other chickens
Harlow: A03: Confounding variables
The two heads were different. This may have been a confounding variable, making the results lack internal vallidity.
Harlow: A03: Generalising
Humans differ to monkeys: our behaviour is chosen by conscious decisions
Harlow: A03: Ethics
Lasting emotional harm for the monkeys
Difficult to form relationships
However, do benefits outweigh costs?