All social studies

Question 1

Milgram (1963)

Answer 1

65% continued to full 450v.

Question 2

Hofling et al (1966)

Answer 2

Nurses would follow doctors orders when asked to give a patient twice the daily dose of a drug.

Question 3

Perrin and Spencer

Answer 3

Supporting Social Impact Theory - probation officers had high levels of influence over those on probation

Question 4

Sedikides and Jackson (1990)

Answer 4

People more likely to obey a uniformed zookeper when told not to lean on railings

Question 4

Milgram and Elms (1966)

Answer 4

obendient participants had high F-scale score (authoritarian)

Question 5

Kilham and Mann (1974)

Answer 5

found gender differences in a replication of milgram in australia

Question 6

Blass (1999)

Answer 6

meta analysis where only k+m had gender differences

Question 7

Shurz (1985)

Answer 7

Milgram but in austria, high obedience, painful ultrasound

Question 8

Slater (2006)

Answer 8

Shocks given to VR avatar in UK, similar results

Question 9

Ember & Ember (1992)

Answer 9

in tribal societies inter-group hostility increases when resources are scarce

Question 10

Aronson et al (1978)

Answer 10

working towards shared goals in a classroom reduced hostility

Question 11

Adorno et al (1950)

Answer 11

Authoritarian personality relates to increased prejudice

Question 12

Lalonde (1992)

Answer 12

Proved in-group bias in hockey teams)

Question 13

Deutsch and Collins (1951)

Answer 13

Segregated housewives more likely to hold sterotypics views on black people .

Question 14

Tajfel et al (1971)

Answer 14

Minial group study on bristol schoolboys

Question 15

Jane Elliot (1980)

Answer 15

Social categorisation by eye colour led to prejudice and discrimination.

Question 16

Weatherell (1982)

Answer 16

New Zealand polynesians more likely to favour the in group.

Question 17

Al-Zahrani and Kaplowitz (1993)

Answer 17

Saudis displayed more negative out group bias than americans (collectivist vs individual)

Question 18

Guimond et al (2013)

Answer 18

Less prejudice in areas with pro-diversity policies (germany vs Canada)