Advocacy Flashcards
what are the steps that help develop the theory of a client’s case?
1/ investigate the facts
2/ conduct legal research and find the relevant law
3/ identify the evidence that is available on each issue in dispute
4/ anticipate contrary evidence from other parties
5/ consider whether the remedy requested flows logically from the theory of the case
6/ assess the strength of the other party’s case
7/ re-evaluate the theory of the case as new information or facts come to light
8/
What is a paralegal’s duty as a prosecutor?
to act as an advocate for the public and the administration of justice. The paralegal must act resolutely and honourably within the limits of the law. NOT to seek conviction, but to see justice is done through a fair trial on the merits.
When advocating for a client, paralegals shall not:
- abuse the tribunal process
- knowingly deceive or mislead the tribunal
- directly or indirectly influence the tribunal other than by means of open persuasion as an advocate
- knowingly assist or permit the client to do anything the paralegal considers to be dishonest or dishonourable
- mistreat witnesses, and
- appear before a court or tribunal while under the influence of alcohol or drugs
a paralegal in possession of incriminating physical evidence should
immediately consult with an experienced criminal lawyer regarding their professional obligations
A paralegal’s obligations re possession of incriminating illegal evidence is that they consider:
Whether to retain independent legal counsel for advice on their obligations.
If a paralegal in posession of incriminating evidence chooses to retain a criminal lawyer for independent legal advice, they must consider whether:
The counsel should be informed of the identity of the client and instructed not to disclose the identity of the client to law enforcement/prosecution; and
independent legal counsel should either disclose or deliver evidence to law enforcement authorities or prosecution, or do both
When considering disclosure/retaining criminal law consultation, a paralegal must balance the duties of
confidentiality and loyalty to client vs duty to the administration of justice
Paralegal’s must inform witnesses that they rep the client and not the witness, and must not:
- stop the witness from providing ALL relevant evidence by supressing information given by the witness, or by trying to persuade them to not testify
- harass the witness who has told the paralegal that they do not wish to discuss the matter
Except with the consent or through a represented person’s legal rep, paralegals must not:
- approach, communicate or deal with the represented person,
- attempt to negotiate or compromise the matter directly with the represented person
To comply with rules re communicating with witnesses during proceedings, paralegal must consider:
- whether the witness is the paralegal’s own witness or is being called by the other party, or
- whether the witness is sympathetic to the paralegal’s own cause
During examination in chief, the paralegal may discuss with their witness…
any matter NOT COVERED in examinations UP TO THAT POINT
Between completion of examination in chief and start of cross-exam, the paralegal cannot discuss
the evidence given or relating to any matter introduced or touched on during the exam in chief
During cross-exam by oppossing liensee, the paralegal
cannot have ANY conversation with the witness about the evidence they are giving or ANY ISSUE in the proceeding
between compeltion of cross exam of the witness and of re exam, the paralegal cannot
discuss with the witness any evidence that will be dealt with on re exam
Rule 7.02 prohibits
communications with any witness who is a represented party in the proceeding without consent from that person’s legal practitioner