Adherence to medical advice Flashcards
Sub-topics
-Types of non-adherence and reasons why patients do not adhere
1. Types of non-adherence and problems caused by
non-adherence
2.Why patients don’t adhere: rational non-adherence
(Bulpitt)
3. The Health Belief Model (Becker)
- Measuring non-adherence
1. Subjective: self-reports (Riekart and Droter)
2. Objective: pill counting (Chung and Naya)
3. Biochemical tests (Roth)
4. Repeat Prescriptions (Sherman et al)
-Improving Adherence
- Improving practitioner style
1. Behavioural techniques
2. Money as an incentive (Yokley and Glenwick)
3. The Funhaler (Watt et al)
Types of non-adherence and problems caused by non-adherence
- causes may be related to the patient, treatment and the type of health care provider
- reasons could be intentional or non-intentional
- morbidity: the incidence of a disease across a population and/or geographic location during a predefined timeframe.
- mortality: the rate of death in a population
Why patients don’t adhere: rational non-adherence
- Bulpitt
- rational choice theory is a framework for understanding and modeling why an individual will behave in a particular way
- one reason for non-adherence is actually a result of a well-considered and reasoned thought process that leads the patient to believe that non-adherence is a better choice of behaviour than adherence.
- Bulpitt: one reason is a rational ‘cost-benefit’ analysis
- concluded that the benefits form treating combined systolic and diastolic hypertension in elderly patients far outweigh the disadvantages.
The Health Belief Model
- Becker
- aims to predict when a person will engage in preventative health behaviors such as stopping smoking, taking up exercise, attending check-ups and yearly screening tests
- the likelihood that individuals will follow medical advice depends directly on two assessments that they make: evaluating the threat and a cost-benefit analysis.
- several factors that can influence a person’s perceived threat of illness: perceived seriousness, susceptibility and cues to action, demographic variables eg: young obsese
- cost benefit assessment: whether the perceived benefits exceed the perceived benefits
Measuring non-adherence
- Subjective: self-reports (Riekart and Droter)
- Objective: pill counting (Chung and Naya)
- Biochemical tests (Roth)
- Repeat Prescriptions (Sherman et al)
Subjective:self-report
- Riekart and Droter
- wanted to examine the implications of non-participation in studies using self-report measures to investigate adherence to medical treatment for adolescents with diabetes.
- ages 11-18 who were living with at least one parent
- series of questionnaires and interviews
- both parents and participant were given a further questionnaire and were asked to mail it back
- 80/94 consented to participate
- 52 returned the follow-up questionnaire
Objective: Pill counting
-Chung and Naya
-electronically assessed adherence with an oral asthma medication
-77, 32 M, 25 F, 18-55
-screening tets of 2-3 weeks and 12 week treatment
-56 tablets were dispensed in screw top bottles fitted
with a TrackCap medication event monitoring system device
-The system comprises of two parts: a standard plastic container and a lid containing a computer chip that registers the time at which the bottle is opened and closed
-median adherence calculated from TRackCap events was 89% but from pill counting it was 92%
Biochemical Tests
- Roth
- levels of medication or its metabolites in blood or urine usually provide a reasonably good indication of the amount of medicine taken and clinical responses or side effects can be indications that medicine was taken.
- blood and urine samples
- empirical evidence has shown that adherence for prescribed medications is higher with frequent urine monitoring
Repeat Prescriptions
- Sherman et al
- wanted to determine if a prescription refill history obtained by calling the patients’ pharmacies identified poor adherence with asthma medications more frequently than the doctor’s assessment from clinical appointments
- 116 children with asthma interviewed with their parents
- operationalized by calculating the no. of doses refilled divided by the no. of doses prescribed over a period up to 365 days
- info provided by pharmacies were 92% correct
- mean adherence: 72%, 61%, 38% for 3 diff inhalers
Improving Practioner Style
- Behavioral techniques
- Money as an incentive (Yokley and Glenwick)
- The Funhaler (Watt et al)
Behavioral techniques
- changing habits using classical conditioning
- using positive reinforcements to encourage positive behavior
- using role models to show the imp of adherence of medical requests.
Money as an incentive
- Yokley and Glenwick
- four conditions: a mailed general prompt, a mailed specific prompt, a mailed specific prompt plus expanded clinic hours and a mailed specific prompt plus a monetary incentive
Money as an incentive
- Yokley and Glenwick
- four conditions: a mailed general prompt, a mailed specific prompt, a mailed specific prompt plus expanded clinic hours and a mailed specific prompt plus a monetary incentive
- conducted on the entire population of a medium sized midwest city (approx 300000)
- target population: children of 5 or younger
- monetary incentive: the biggest impact
- specific prompts also effective and has reduced costs than the monetary prompt
The Funhaler
- Watt et al
- Funhaler: incorporates incentive toys to a child’s inhaler
- if the correct breathing technique is used, the child is rewarded by a fun whistle sound and a spinning toy within the inhaler.
- when surveyed at random, 60% more children adhered to what was supposed to be done