AB.Auto Flashcards
Identify the 7 goals of Alberta auto insurance reform
(Hint: PRAIRIS)
- Private sector delivery model
- Reduce or eliminate costs from system
- Appropriate medical benefits
- Income replacement - easier access
- Requiring insurers to be responsive to the needs of their customers and accountable for their claims related decisions and practices
- Insurance rates - affordability & stability of insurance rates
- competitive Sustainability of auto insurance industry
Briefly describe the 5 findings of the Alberta auto insurance committee
- High premiums were caused by increasing bodily injury costs (specifically non-pecuniary awards for pain & suffering due to the tort system)
- No mechanisms existed to control these BI costs
- Injury compensation was often inadequate
- Health outcomes are worse under tort systems
- Health outcomes improved when tort systems were eliminated and replaced with full no-fault models
Name 2 provinces that have a pure no-fault system
Manitoba & Quebec
Identify the 2 recommendations of the Alberta auto insurance committee
• replace existing hybid tort/no-fault model with a pure no-fault model
• introduce a “continuum of care model” to promote appropriate medical evaluation, assessment and treatment
Why might a pure no-fault system be cheaper and deliver more effective medical treatment?
benefits can be delivered without having to prove who is at fault:
• less money to lawyers
• quicker access to medical care
Describe how Alberta’s new auto insurance is recommended to work
Create a Traffic Injury Regulator, including a Board and Tribunal to oversee the 4 arms of accident care & compensation:
[1] claims administration and support
[2] medical experts to evaluate injuries
[3] claims assessment panels for income replacement
[4] a reconstituted version of AIRB (Automobile Insurance Rate Board)
How might the “4 arms” of Alberta’s Traffic Injury Regulator be funded?
• mainly by Alberta auto insurers in proportion to their market share
• a smaller contribution by the Alberta government (from savings generated by the new system)
Assess the likelihood of a successful legal challenge if Alberta’s auto reforms are implemented
A legal challenge would probably not be successful for the following reasons:
→ Manitoba and Quebec already have a pure no-fault system
→ such systems have been judged to be within the scope of provincial legislative authority
→ a challenge under Canada’s Charter of Rights & Freedoms has no merit because all drivers are treated equally
→ Morrow v Zhang upheld the minor injury cap so a future Charter challenge would likely not succeed either
(So Alberta’s auto reforms would likely survive a legal challenge)
Identify 2 regulatory reforms being considered for Albert auto insurance
• switch from ‘prior approval’ to ‘file & use’
• make winter tires mandatory from October to March
Identify 2 problems that Alberta and Ontario auto insurance have in common
• rising cost of auto insurance (largely bodily injury costs)
• inefficient delivery of medical care
What has been identified as a primary cause of problems in AB & ON auto insurance
both systems have a tort component which causes:
→ delays in medical care
→ diversion of resources to the legal system
Identify a similarity in recommendations to address these problems in AB & ON auto insurance
Greater focus on timely medical care
Identify a difference in recommendations to address these problems in AB & ON auto insurance
Alberta:
• convert to a pure no-fault system
Ontario:
• keep hybrid tort/no-fault system
(but fix structural flaws by appointing an arms-length regulator with powers to enact policies & procedures)