A3. Ethical and governance issues Flashcards
Financial strategy and key stakeholder groups:
For financial strategy to be successful it needs to be communicated and supported by key stakeholder groups:
• Internal – managers, employees
• Connected - shareholders, banks, customers, suppliers
• External – government, pressure groups, local communities
Where a strategy creates a conflict between the interest of shareholders and those of other stakeholder groups then this can create ethical issues which need to be carefully managed.
Ethical considerations in financial management (examples):
- Investment – fairness of wages, working conditions, impact on environment, bribery of officials
- Financing – bank with unethical profile, supressing bad news when finance is being raised
- Dividend – at the expense of product quality
- Risk management – neglect to hit profit targets, diversification then not in best interest.
Ethics should and functional areas of the company
Ethics should govern the conduct of corporate policy in all functional areas of the company, such as a company’s treatment of its workers, suppliers and customers. The ethical stance of a company is concerned with the extent that an organisation will exceed its minimum obligations to its stakeholders.
Examples of ethical issues in different business functions:
• Human resource management. Ethical problems arise when there is a conflict between the financial objectives of the firm and the rights of the employees:
o Minimum wage -if there are no minimum wage requirements, companies may take advantage and offer low wages. Business ethics would require that companies should not exploit workers.
o Discrimination – sexual orientation, race, gender, age – prohibited in most advanced economies through equal opportunity legislation.
• Marketing. Being one of the main ways of communication with customers, it should be truthful and sensitive to the social and cultural impact on society (no vulnerable groups, stereotypes or insecurity)
• Customers and suppliers. Companies should not take advantage of their dominant position in the market to exploit suppliers or customers.
The 5 fundamental principles of the ACCA Code of Ethics
The 5 fundamental principles of the ACCA Code of Ethics must be followed:
• Integrity – Members shall be ‘straightforward and honest in all professional and business relationships. Integrity implies not merely honesty, but fair dealing and truthfulness.
• Objectivity – Members shall not allow bias, conflicts of interest or the undue influence of others to compromise their professional or business judgement.
• Professional competence and due care – Members have a continuing duty ‘to maintain professional knowledge and skill at a level required to ensure that clients or employers receive competent professional service’. Members shall ‘act diligently in accordance with applicable technical and professional standards when providing professional services’.
• Confidentiality – Members shall respect the confidentiality of information ‘acquired as a result of professional and business relationships’ and shall not disclose any such information to third parties ‘without proper and specific authority or unless there is a legal or professional right or duty to disclose’. Similarly, confidential information acquired as a result of professional and business relationships shall not be used to the personal advantage of members or third parties.
• Professional behaviour – Members shall comply with relevant laws and regulations and shall avoid any action that may discredit the profession.
Ethical issues often arise from a conflict between the needs of different stakeholder groups. Examples:
- Directors and shareholders. Directors may be more risk averse, than shareholders, because greater proportion of their income and wealth is tied up in the company that employs them, whereas shareholders will hold a diversified portfolio of shares (agency theory).
- Between different shareholder groups. Some might have preference for short-term dividends, others for long-term capital gain (requiring more cash to be reinvested, and less to be paid as dividend)
- Between shareholders and debt holders. Debt holders may be more risk averse than shareholders, because it is only shareholders who will benefit if risky projects succeed.
- Shareholders and staff/customers/suppliers. Pursuit of short-term profits may lead to difficult relationships with other stakeholders (changes in terms, redundancies).
- Shareholders and external stakeholders. The impact of a company’s activities may impact adversely on its environment.
The ACCA has developed a five-step framework to help you make ethical decisions.
These are:
• Step 1 - Establishing the issues. A business needs to be aware of the ethical issues that it faces.
• Step 2 - Are there threats to compliance with fundamental principles? A company’s fundamental ethical principles need to be clearly understood.
• Step 3 - Are the threats significant? If an employee is unsure about this, they should use the mirror test. If felt to be significant, it needs to be reported to the ethics department to deal with it.
• Step 4 - Are there safeguards to reduce threats to an acceptable level? Safeguards in place in the work environment such as policies and procedures to monitor the quality of work, or to encourage communication of ethical concerns.
• Step 5 – Can you face yourself in the mirror? Sometimes called the mirror test. Whether or not you choose to perform the action, it’s useful to look in the mirror and ask yourself:
o Is it legal?
o What will others think? – How would you feel explaining what you did to a friend, a parent, a spouse, a child, a manager, or the media?
o Is it right? – What does your conscience or your instinct tell you?
Framework for developing ethical policies
Framework for developing ethical policies
• Establish stakeholder concerns:
o Assess impact of activities (eg investment) on stakeholders and ensure that solutions are researched to try to meet their needs where possible.
o Ethical concerns should then be reported to an ethics committee to ensure that the Board is aware and can take action
• Ensure that the company’s fundamental ethical principles are understood by everyone
o Issue code of conduct outlining key ethical values
o Shows commitment from senior management
o Provides guidance for staff
• Introduce safeguards to reduce threats to an acceptable level
o Policies and procedures
o Executive bonus scheme to include ethical measures?
o Greater powers to the risk management function
o Whistle-blowers hotline
Agency relationships
Agency relationships occur when one party, the principal, employs another party, the agent, to perform a task on their behalf. In the case of corporate governance, the principal is a shareholder and the agents are the directors. The directors are accountable to the principals. For example, managers can be seen as the agents of shareholders, employees as the agents of managers, managers and shareholders as the agents of long and short-term creditors, etc. The problem lies in the fact that once the agent has been appointed, he is able to act in his own selfish interests rather than pursuing the objectives of the principal.
Agency Costs.
- A cost to the shareholder through having to monitor the directors
- Over and above normal analysis costs
- A result of comprised trust in directors
The goal of agency theory
The goal of agency theory is to find governance structures and control mechanisms (incentives) that minimise the problem caused by the separation of ownership and control.
Goal congruence
Goal congruence is accordance between the objectives of agents acting within an organization and the objectives of the organisation as a whole. It may be better achieved and the ‘agency problem ‘better dealt with by giving managers some profit-related pay, or providing incentives which are related to profits or share price, such as:
• Profit-related/economic value-added pay – bonus or pay related to size of profits or EVA
• Rewarding managers with shares – this might be done when private company goes public and managers are invited to subscribe to shares at attractive offer price.
• Executive share option plans – selected employees are given a number of shae options, each of which gives the holder the right after a certain date to subscribe for shares in the company at fixed price. The value of option will increase if the companu is successful and share price goes up.
Transaction cost theory.
Transaction costs occur when dealing with another party.
• Search and information costs: to find the supplier.
• Bargaining and decision costs: to purchase the component.
• Policing and enforcement costs: to monitor quality
If items are made within the company itself, therefore, there are no transaction costs. Company will try to keep as many transactions as possible in-house in order to:
• Reduce uncertainties about dealing with suppliers
• Avoid high purchase prices
• Manage quality
Analysing transaction costs can be difficult because of:
- Bounded rationality: our limited capacity to understand business situations, which limits the factors we consider in the decision.
- Opportunism: actions taken in an individual’s best interests, which can create uncertainty in dealings and mistrust between parties.
The 3 factors to take into account as to whether the transaction costs are worthwhile are:
- Uncertainty. Do we trust the other party enough? The more certain we are, the lower the transaction / agency cost.
- Frequency. How often will this be needed? The less often, the lower the transaction/agency cost.
- Asset specificity. How unique is the item? The more unique the item, the more worthwhile the transaction / agency cost is.