A01 Biopsychology and research methods Flashcards
A01
Neurons and synaptic transmission
the structure and function of neurons
-neurons are cells specialised to carry info throughout the body. They consist of a cell body, dendrites and an axon. The axon is covered in an insulating layer called the myelin sheath which allows nerve impulses to travel along it more rapidly
-neurons receive a signal via their dendrites from other neurons or form sensory receptors and pass it on via their axon. Nerve impulses travel along the axon in the form of an electrical signal called an action potential
-sensory neurons carry nerve impulses from sensory receptors to the spinal cord and the brain CNS
-relay neurons connect sensory and motor neurons and are found in the CNS. They are also known as interneurons.
-motor neurons are located in the PNS and have long axons which carry nerve impulses to muscles triggering muscle contraction
Synaptic transmission
-in synaptic transmission the nerve impulse crosses the synapse between the presynaptic and postsynaptic neuron with the help of neurotransmitters
-the arrival of an action potential at the end of an axon triggers the release of neurotransmitter molecules from synaptic vesicles into the synaptic gap by exocytosis
-these neurotransmitter molecules diffuse across the gap and bind to specialised receptors in the membrane of the postsynaptic neuron where they trigger a new action potential
-neurotransmitters are removed from the synaptic gap by reuptake into the presynaptic neuron for recycling or they may be broken down by enzymes. Some drugs affect the rate of reuptake or breakdown of neurotransmitters eg SSRIs affect the reuptake of serotonin
Excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters
-neurotransmitters can have different effects when they bind to the receptor on the postsynaptic neuron. The total effect determines whether an impulse is produced in the next neuron
-excitatory neurotransmitters cause an excitatory postsynaptic potential EPSP making the postsynaptic neuron more likely to fire. They include acetylcholine and noradrenaline
- inhibitory neurotransmitters cause an inhibitory postsynaptic potential IPSP making the postsynaptic neuron less likely to fire. They include serotonin and GABA
-the summation of EPSP and IPSP inputs determines whether or not an action potential is produced or how frequently the neuron will fire
A01
Endocrine system
Glands and hormones
-endocrine glands produce & secrete hormones into bloodstream. Each gland in endocrine system produces specific hormones
-hormones are bodys chemical messengers. Theyre released by endocrine glands into bloodstream where they circulate around whole body
- bind to specific receptor molecules on surface of target cells stimulating response in target cells.
Pituitary gland
- pituitary gland is controlled by hypothalamus which regulates many body functions. pituitary releases hormones which control many other endocrine glands
- anterior pituitary releases adrenocorticotrophic hormone ACTH as response to stress & also produces luteinising hormone LH & follicle stimulating hormone FSH
-pituitary hormones have different effects in males & females in females LH & FSH stimulate ovaries to produce oestrogen & progresterone whereas in males they stimulate testes to produce testosterone & sperm
- Posterior pituitary release oxytocin. females this stimulates contraction of uterus in childbirth & involved in mother infant bonding. males oxytocin plays role in sexual behaviour & in reduction of anxiety
adrenal glands
- adrenal glands sit on top of kidneys. adrenal cortex produces cortisol which regulates important cardiovascular functions in the body. The adrenal medulla releases adrenaline and noradrenaline which prepare the body for fight or flight
-cortisol production is increased in response to stress. If cortisol level is low the individual has low blood pressure poor immune function and an ability to deal with stress
-adrenaline helps the body to respond to acute stress by increasing heart rate and blood flow to the muscles and brain and encouraging the breakdown of glycogen into glucose to provide energy
-noradrenaline constricts the blood vessels causing blood pressure to increase
Hormone regulation
-glands and hormones are self regulated by negative feedback homeostasis
-eg the hypothalamus releases corticotrophin releasing hormone CRH this stimulates the pituitary to release ACTH this in turn stimulates the release of hormones from the adrenal cortex such as cortisol. An increase in the blood conecnetration of cortisol slows down the release of CRH and ACTH this ensures levels of hormones circulating in the blood are kept stable
A03
The feeback system may break down in long term stress
-the hypothalamus and pituitary gland have special receptors that monitor circulating cortisol levels
-monitoring and controlling cortisol levels limits the potentially damaging effecrs of this hormone on the body. However research has found that the longer an individual is exposed to stress the more adverse the effects are
-this might explain why indivuals in stressful jobs or stressful relationships suffer more stress related illness.
A01 the experimental method
-psycholgical investigations begin with aim which may be an inention eg to investigate the effect of tv on the work a student produces or a research question eg does noise affect the quality of work
-the IV is directly manipulated by the experimenter. The different values of the IV are known as the experimental conditions
-the DV is measured to see how the change in the IV has affected it. In an experiment the IV is deliberately changed to see if there is any effect on the DV. This permits us to draw causal conclusions- conclusions about cause and affect
issues and debates
- determinism scientific determinism allows researchers to draw conclusions from experiments
-this leads to a hypothesis a testable statement of what you expect to find. A good hypothesis includes the two or more levels of the IV eg students who do a memory task with the tv on produce work that gets fewer marks than those who do the same task without the TV on.
The hypothesis should be fully operationalised ie the variables should be defined in way that they can be easily measured or tested. A concept such as educationali attainment needs to be specified nmore clearly if we are going to investigate it. For example it might be operationalised as GCSE grade in maths.
-standardised procedures ernsure that each participant does exactlty the same thing withbin each condtition in order that the study can be repeated. They may include standardised instructions- the instructions given to particpants to tell them how to perform the task
-extraneous variables- EVs should be identified and controlled before the expriement begins. These are any variables other than the IV itself which may potentially affect the DV if EVs are not controlled they may become confounding variables which affect the validity of the findings
-the procedure should also include consideration of ethical issues and how to deal with them.
-research question aim hypothesis procedure findings conclusions
A01 control of variables
- there is a trade of between control and realism in psychological research
- lab experiments have the greatest control and allow conclusions about cause and effect relationships but findings in this artificial context may not be generalizable to real life situations. They may lack mundane realism so the results may not apply to behaviour in the real world
- however studies in everyday settings lack control of extraneous variables so the findings may be meaningless. Uncontrolled extraneous variables may affect the DV in an experiment become confounding variables. These could include factors like time of fay noise and distractions
- researchers hope to be able to generalise the findings of a study beyond the research setting. Generalisability may be limited if aspects of the study lack realism for example the materials used in the study the environment of the study particularly if participants are aware they are being studied the sample of participants
- validity refers to whether an observed effect is a genuine one
- internal validity- is the degree to which an observed effect was due to experimental manipulation other than factors such as the confounding/ extraneous variables
- external validity is the extent to which the findings from particular research participants can be generalised to other people and situations
- ecological validity- can the research findings be generalised to everyday life
- population validity- can the findings from this sample of participants be generalised to all people
- historical validity-can the results of an old study be generalised to peoples behaviour today.
A01 return to hypotheses and other things
Directional and non directional hypotheses
-a directional hypothesis states the expected direction of the results for example people who get an average of eight hours or more of sleep per night achieve higher marks in class tests than those who get fewer than eight of hours sleep
-a directional hypothesis can be used when past research (theory or studies) suggests that the findings will go in a particular direction if there is no relevant past research or findings are contradictory then a non directional hypothesis should be used. A non directional hypothesis states there is a difference between the two conditions but does not state the direction of the difference
-Lack of sleep affects performance in class tests
-to fully operationalise these hypotheses an operationalised IV and DV should be used in each case eg an average of eight hours or more sleep per night Iv higher marks in class tests DV
A few other things
-a pilot study is a small scale trial run of research design to check all aspects of the procedure and change some if necessary these could include
-the instructions to participants- are they clear- did participants understand what they had to do
-the timings too long or too short
-the materials used did participants have any difficulties understanding them- were there too many tasks or questions leading to boredom or fatigue
-whether participants had guessed the purpose of the study
-if a researcher tries out the research design using a few typical participants they can see what needs to be adjusted without having invested large amounts of time and money in a full scale study
-the results of a plot study are irrelevant. However carrying out a pilot study and making appropriate changes to the procedure can improve the validity and reliability of the main studys findings
-sometimes a researcher has to use another person to play a role in an investigation. They are part of the research set up rather than being a participant for example milgrams study on obedience used confederates to play the roles of the experimenter and the learner. In aschs study on conformity the confederates pretended to be other participants.
A01 experimental design
- in a repeated measures design every participant carries out each condition of the experiment all levels of the IV. The performance DV each participant on the two tests can be compared
- to deal with order effects in a repeated measures design researchers can use counterbalancing to ensure that each condition is tested first or second in equal amounts
- for example half of the participants carry out condition a then b and the other half do b then a alternatively all particpants take part in each condition twice ABBA
- in an independent groups design each group of participants does one condition of the experiment and the performance of the two groups is compared
- participants should be randomly allocated to the conditions in order to distribute participant variables evenly so they do not become confounding. In a matched pairs design two groups of participants are used but pairs are matched on key characteristics believed to affect performance on the DV. For example age or gender may be relevant to some studies but this decision must be based on evidence
- for each matched pair one member is randomly allocated to each condition
A03 experimental design
Limitations of repeated measures design
- order effects such as practice (that may improve performance) boredom or fatigue effects (that may worsen performance)
- participants may also guess the purpose of the experiment affecting their performance in the second condition
- researchers may use two different but equivalent tests to reduce practice effects. Counterbalancing is the main way of dealing with order effects. A cover story can help to prevent participants guessing the aims of the study
Limitations of independent groups design
- participant variables (individual differences) cannot be controlled and are a confounding variable
- in addition more participants are required than a repeated measures design
- randomly allocating participants to conditions help to distribute participant variables evenly (in theory)
Limitations of matched pairs design
-it is very time consuming and difficult to match people on key variables and requires participants to be selected from a large pool
-also only known variables can be matched and there are likely to be other relevant variables that were not known about but still affect the DV
-restricting the number of variables to match would make it easier. Researchers could conduct a pilot study to explore which key variables may be important to match
Strengths of each design
-the limitations of one design are often the strengths of another
-for example one limitation of repeated measures is that participants do better in the second condition because of a practice effect
-therefore one strength of independent measures ad matched pairs designs is that they avoid order effects because each participant does only one condition
A01 lab and field experiments
- all experiments involve the manipulation of the IV while trying to keep all other variables constant so that the IVs effect s on the DV can be measured. We can then conclude that the change in the IV has caused the change in the DV.
- lab experiments are carried out in a special environment where variables can be controlled
- participants are aware that they are taking part in a study so they may alter their behaviour
- lab environment and the materials used may be quite unlike everyday life
- not all lab studies are lab experiments they could be observations natural experiments or quasi experiments
- field experiments are carried out in a more natural environment. The IV is still deliberately manipulated by the researcher
- participants are usually unaware that they are participating in an experiment so their behaviour may be more natural
- not all field studies are experiments the IV must be manipulated by the experimenter
- some experiments carried out in a lab environment but the purpose of the study is so well concealed that participants behave quite naturally so the study is more like a field experiment
A03 lab and field experiments
Strengths and limitations of lab experiments
-they are high in internal validity because variables are tightly controlled so we can be more certain that any change in the DV is due to the IV
-however they have poor ecological validity. This is because the setting is low in mundane realism and the IV or DV may be operationalised in ways that don’t represent everyday life.
-the participants know they are in a study so may alter their behaviour (demand characteristics)
Strengths and limitations of field experiment s
-they are in a more natural setting so participants are less likely to respond to cues in their environment
-however there is less control of extraneous variables. This means they may be lower in internal validity than a lab experiment
A01 natural and quasi experiments
Natural experiment
-is conducted when it is not possible for ethical or practical reasons to deliberately manipulate an IV the IV is naturally occurring it may take place in a lab or in the natural environment
-the DV is measured but only tentative conclusions can be drawn about the IVs effect on the DV as the IV was not deliberately manipulated and participants were not randomly allocated to conditions
-an example is the study of the effect of institutionalisation on children in which the two groups were adopted before or after 6 months of age. The DV could be measured in a lab eg IQ or behaviour in the strange situation
Quasi experiment
-in a quasi experiment the IV is also naturally occurring- it is a naturally existing difference between people for example gender. Again causal conclusions must be tentative
-the IV could be measured by psychological testing for example groups of people with internal or external locus of control. This is a personal attribute of the individuals not something that was manipulated by researchers
-participants responses in a situation would then be the DV measured in the quasi experiment
Strengths of natural and quasi experiment
-natural experiments allow psychologists to research real problems
-for example the effects of a disaster on health where the IV already exists
-this gives high levels of mundane realism and ecological validity
Limitations of natural and quasi experiments
-the IV is not directly manipulated so we cant be sure that any change in the DV is caused by the IV
-also participants are not randomly allocated to conditions so there may be differences between groups of participants giving a confounding variables
-finally the sample may be unique so the findings cant be generalised to other groups and the study has low population validity
A01
Demand characteristics
Demand characteristics
-participant effects refer to the behaviour of participants in response to an experimental situation
-demand characteristics are cues that make participants unconsciously aware of the aims of a study or help them work out what the researcher expects to find. The situation creates expectations and participants do not behave as they would usually
-participants generally want to be helpful and can therefore behave cooperatively. Some participants deliberately try to spoil an experiment the screw you effect. Thus demand characteristics may act as a confounding variable
Investigator effects
-investigator effects are any cues from an investigator that encourage certain behaviours in the participant and which might lead to a fulfilment of the investigators expectations
-for example investigators may be more encouraging to one group of participants or may ask leading questions
-investigator effects may act as a confounding variable. These may include direct effects (as a result of the investigator interacting with the participant) and indirect effects (as a consequence of the way the investigator designed the study)
-participant variables- are the characteristics of individual participants which act as extraneous variables in an independent group design such as age,intelligence and motivation. These variables can be controlled by a repeated measures or a matched pairs design (matching for relevant characteristics) these are not the same as participant effects
-situational variables are features of the research situation which may influence participants behaviour. They become confounding variables if they vary systematically with the IV for example all members of one group are tested in the morning and the second group in the afternoon.
A03 Demand characteristics
Single blind designs can help to deal with demand characteristics
-in a single blind design the participant is not aware of the research aims or which condition of the experiment they are in
-this prevents the participant from responding to cues about the aims or expectations of the experiment
-this means they should behave more naturally improving the validity of the study
Double blind designs are even better at reducing demand characteristics
-in a double blind design both the participant and the person conducting the experiment are blind to the aims or hypotheses in this study
-ideally the person conducting the experiment will also be unaware of which particpants are in which group or condition
-this means that the investigator is less likely to produce cues linked to their expectations of what will happen in the study
Experimental realism also helps to reduce demand characteristics
-if the events appear natural and realistic the participant will behave more naturally
-if the participant is sufficiently engaged in the task they are not paying attention to the fact that they are being observed
-this means they are less likely to change their behaviour to fit the expectations of the experimenter.
A01 self report techniques
Questionnaires
- predetermined set of written questions which can permit a researcher to find out what people think and feel
- they can be used to collect quantitative data which is then analysed using statistical tests or qualitative data which gives deeper insight into individuals experiences
- the questionnaire may provide data directly to answer a research question. Altenratively it may be part of an experimental study for example to identify two groups of particpants with different belief the IV in order to explore their responses the DV
- structured interviews – also have predetermined questions. The interviewer reads out the questions and the interviewer replies. There is no deviation from the written questions
- in an unstructured interview the interviewer may begin with general aims and a few starting questions but the conversation develops depending on the answers given
A03 self report techniques
Self report techniques may lack validity
-researchers are trying to gain access to peoples thoughts, feelings and attitudes
-however people may not be able to express their thoughts clearly or may not be truthful
-this leads to a social desirability bias in the findings as people answer in a way which presents them in a good light
Questionnaires and interviews can both give biased data
-questioannaires can be used to collect data from a large sample of people and people may be more honest in them than in an interview
-however people who complete questionnaires may not be representative of the population as they have to have time and motivation
-on the other hand interviewers can influence the answers people give by unconscious non verbal signals giving interviewer bias
Dara from structured interviews is easier to analyse than from unstructured interviews
-unstructured interviews are similar to questionnaires and data from standardised questions can be analysed quite simply
-however in an unstructured interview the interviewer tailors the questions to specific responses so answers are harder to analyse
-but unstructured interviews allow researchers to obtain more detailed info and deeper insights into individuals feelings thoughts and experiences.
A01 sampling
- the population is the wider group of individuals the researcher is interested in. from this population they select a smaller sample to study eg 20-30 participants ideally the sample will be representative of the population so that generalisations can be made
- opportunity sample people are recruited based on convenience or availability
- random sample each person in the population has an equal chance of being selected
- the lottery method- all names are written on slips of paper put in a hat and the number of names required are selected
- random number generators- everyone is given a number and the computer picks numbers randomly
- stratified sample- subgroups within the population are identified eg age groups or genders. Participants are obtained from each group in proportion to their occurrence in the population using random selection
- systematic sample-using a predetermined system to select participants such as every twentish person on a lot
- volunteer sample- advertisements are placed on the internet or on a noticeboard or in a newspaper and the study uses those who respond to this request
- bias is a distortion in the data. Biases in psychological research include experimenter bias interviewer bias, observer bias, social desirability bias and sampling bias
- sample bias- sample inevitably differs from the population and does not perfectly represent it
- volunteer bias occurs because volunteers are likely to differ from the population as they are willing an available to take part
A03 sampling
more studies use opportunity or volunteer sampling
-these are the easiest methods and so take less time to find a sample than other methods
-however an opportunity sample is inevitably biased by who happened to be available at the time
-volunteer bias can also be a problem as participants may be highly motivated to take part and therefore differ from a typical member of the population
Random sampling is theoretically the least biased method
-all members of the population have an equal chance of being selected
-however it requires a list of names of all members of the population from which a random selection is recruited
-this is time consuming and some randomly selected people may refuse to take part resulting in a biased sample
Stratified sampling can be more representative than some methods
-this is because there is a proportional representation of subgroups
-however subgroups must be identified and participants randomly selected from subgroups then contacted
-this is very time consuming and people may not agree to participants giving a biased sample.