9.4 Fiscal Stabilization Policy Flashcards
Is fiscal stabilzation policy fundamentally a short or long run policy?
Fiscal stabilization policy is fundamentally a short-run policy. In response to various shocks that cause changes in real GDP, the government may use various fiscal tools in an attempt to push real GDP back toward potential output.
What are the alternatives to using fiscal stabilization policy?
The alternatives to using fiscal stabilization policy are to wait for the recovery of private-sector demand (a shift in the AD curve) or to wait for the economy’s adjustment process (a shift in the AS curve) to bring real GDP back to potential. The slower these processes are, the stronger is the justification for government to use its fiscal tools.
Example of Canadian fiscal stabilization policy.
Canadian federal expenditure during the Second World War rose from 12.2 percent of GDP in 1939 to 41.8 percent in 1944. At the same time, the unemployment rate fell from 11.4 percent to 1.4 percent as the economy boomed.
More recently, the Canadian government dramatically increased spending in an effort to dampen the effects of the major global recession that began in late 2008. Most economists agree that this “fiscal stimulus” contributed significantly to real GDP growth in the 2009–2012 period.
What effect does a reduction in tax rates or an increase in government purchases or transfers do the the AD curve and real GDP?
In our macroeconomic model, a reduction in tax rates or an increase in government purchases or transfers will shift the AD curve to the right, causing an increase in real GDP.
What does an increase in tax rates or a cut in government spending do to the AD curve?
An increase in tax rates or a cut in government spending will shift the AD curve to the left, causing a decrease in real GDP.
In the absence of a recovery in private-sector demand, such a recessionary gap can be closed in two ways. Whats the first?
The first involves the economy’s adjustment process that we saw previously in this chapter. The excess supply of factors at will eventually cause wages and other factor prices to fall, shifting the AS curve downward and restoring output to , as shown in part (i) of the figure.
However, because of the downward stickiness of wages, this process may take a long time. Policymakers may not be prepared to wait the time necessary for the recessionary gap to correct itself.
In the absence of a recovery in private-sector demand, such a recessionary gap can be closed in two ways. Whats the second way?
The second way to close the recessionary gap involves an active policy choice. The government can use expansionary fiscal policy to shift the AD curve to the right, as shown in part (ii) of the figure. It would do this by reducing tax rates, increasing transfers, or increasing the level of government purchases.
What does the closing of a ressesionary gap look like graphically?
What are ways a recessionary gap may be closed?
A recessionary gap may be closed by a (slow) downward shift of the AS curve or an increase in aggregate demand.
What is the advantage of using fiscal policy to fix a recession?
The advantage of using fiscal policy rather than allowing the economy to recover naturally is that it may substantially shorten what might otherwise be a long recession.
What is a potential disadvantage of the use of fiscal policy?
One disadvantage is that the use of fiscal policy may stimulate the economy just before private-sector spending recovers on its own. As a result, the economy may overshoot its potential output, and an inflationary gap may open up. In this case, fiscal policy that is intended to promote economic stability can actually cause instability.
In the absence of a downward adjustment of private-sector demand, there are two ways such an inflationary gap may be closed. What is the first one?
Again, the first involves the economy’s adjustment process. Excess demand for factors will cause wages and other factor prices to rise, shifting the AS curve upward and gradually restoring output to Y* , as shown in part (i) of the figure.
In the absence of a downward adjustment of private-sector demand, there are two ways such an inflationary gap may be closed. What is the second one?
Alternatively, the government can use a contractionary fiscal policy to shift the AD curve to the left and close the inflationary gap, as shown in part (ii). The government would do this by increasing tax rates, reducing transfers, or reducing its level of purchases.
What does the closing if an inflationary gap look like grapically?
How can an inflationary gap potentially be removed?
An inflationary gap may be removed by an upward shift of the AS curve or by a leftward shift of the AD curve.