10.1 The Nature of Economic Growth Flashcards
What are the three aspects of Economic Growth?
- Real GDP
- Real Per Capita GDP
- Real GDP per worker
What does real GDP NOT tell us about?
Though real GDP is an accepted measure of the amount of annual economic activity that passes through markets, it does not tell us about changes in average material living standards because it does not take into account the growth in the population—more national income is not necessarily better if more people have to share it.
What has been the overall direction of the three factors of economic growth over the past half-century?
Real GDP, real per capita GDP, and labour productivity have all grown substantially over the past half-century.
What have certain factors of economic growth grown faster than others over the last half-century?
Real GDP has grown faster than real per capita GDP because the population has grown. Real per capita GDP has grown faster than real GDP per worker (labour productivity) because the level of employment has grown faster than the population.
What is one of the ost im0portant reasons that per capita GDP increses over many years?
As we will see in this chapter, one of the most important reasons that per capita GDP increases over many years is growth in productivity.
How much more productive are Canadian works now than they were in 1961?
Its overall growth from 1961 to 2020 is 98 percent, an average annual growth rate of 1.2 percent; the average Canadian worker in 2020 produced almost double the amount of output produced by the average worker in 1961.
How does labour productivity grow over time?
Any new production process or technique that raises output proportionally more than it raises labour input will increase labour productivity.
Often the introduction of new physical capital or new techniques allow firms to increase output while reducing their use of labour. In this case, labour productivity for the firm might increase significantly.
How do we get from these specific micro examples back to macroeconomics and the change in real GDP and aggregate labour productivity?
If in each example the amount of work is unchanged but output rises, real GDP and aggregate labour productivity will both be higher as a result.
If instead each specific output is unchanged but the amount of work is reduced, then we need to recognize that the workers released from these activities are now available to move to other firms and industries.
When they begin working elsewhere in the economy, their new production will constitute an increase in real GDP. In this case, total work effort will be back to its original level but real GDP will be higher—an increase in aggregate labour productivity.
Definition of Economic growth
Sustained, long-run increases in the level of real GDP or real per capita GDP.
How do small differences in income growth rates affect levels of income over a few decades?
Small differences in income growth rates make enormous differences in levels of income over a few decades.
What is the rule of 72?
It is useful to know the “rule of 72” to understand the cumulative effects of annual growth rates. For any variable that grows at an annual rate of X percent, that variable will double in approximately 72/X years.
What is another application of the rule of 72?
Another application of the rule of 72 is to determine the gap in living standards between countries with different growth rates. If one country grows faster than another, the gap in their respective living standards will widen progressively. If, for example, Canada and France start from the same level of income but Canada grows at 3 percent per year while France grows at 2 percent per year, Canada’s income will be twice France’s in 72 years.
What is the central lession we should derive about small differences in annual growth rates?
The longer your time horizon, the more you should care about the economy’s long-run growth rate. Small differences in annual growth rates, if sustained for many years, lead to large differences in income levels.
How do economists typically measure average living standards?
Economists typically measure average material living standards with real per capita GDP.
What is important to distinguish between when thinking about average licing standards and economic growth?
But it is important to distinguish between the increases in average living standards that economic growth brings more or less automatically and the reduction in poverty that economic growth makes possible but that may still require active policy to make a reality.