16.3 The Effects of Government Debt and Deficits Flashcards
What do we assume in our macro model concerning the relationship between budget deficits and national savings?
In our macro model, we assume that an increase in the government’s budget deficit leads to a decrease in national saving.
We make this assumption because it is consistent with the bulk of empirical evidence on this issue.
A Fiscal Expansion Crowds Out Private Investment (Graph)
What are the long-run effects of an icnrease in the budget deficit in a closed economy?
For a closed economy, the long-run effects of an increase in the budget deficit will be a higher real interest rate and a reduction in private investment.
What is the effect of an increase in the budget deficit on the amount of investment in the economy?
As we said earlier, an increase in the budget deficit is assumed to cause a reduction in the supply of national saving.
As we saw in Chapter 10, a reduction in the supply of national saving will shift the NS curve to the left, increase the equilibrium real interest rate, and reduce the amount of investment in the economy.
What is Crowding out?
Crowding out
The offsetting reduction in private expenditure caused by the rise in interest rates that follows an expansionary fiscal policy.
What is useful to examine in order to better understand the crowding out of investment?
To better understand the crowding out of investment, it is useful to examine the short-run effects in the AD/AS diagram, and also the economy’s adjustment process as Y moves back to Potential
What is the effect of a higer interest rate in the new long-run equlibrium that follows it?
The higher interest rate causes a reduction in desired investment. In the new long-run equilibrium, the amount of investment is less than it was prior to the increase in the budget deficit. The end result of the fiscal expansion is therefore a crowding out of private investment.
What is the long-run effect of a fiscal expansion?
The long-run effect of a fiscal expansion is to reduce national saving, increase the real interest rate, and crowd out private investment.
In an open economy, what is the effect of a rise in the rea interest rate on Canadian net exports.
In an open economy, the government budget deficit attracts foreign financial capital and appreciates the domestic currency. The long-run result is a crowding out of net exports.
As real interest rates rise in Canada, foreigners are attracted to the higher-yield Canadian assets and thus foreign financial capital flows into Canada.
But since Canadian dollars are required in order to buy Canadian interest-earning assets, this capital inflow increases the demand for Canadian dollars in the foreign-exchange market and leads to an appreciation of the Canadian dollar.
If the currency appreciation is sustained over several months or longer, it will cause a reduction in Canada’s exports and an increase in Canada’s imports; Canadian net exports, NX, will fall.
Recall an equation of national income accounting
What is the effect on private expenditure after a fiscal expansion policy (Increase spending in G) AFTER Y has returned to Y*
In the long run, however, after Y has returned to , the higher-than-initial value of government purchases implies that the sum of the three private expenditure components must be lower than it was at the initial long-run equilibrium.
We cannot say precisely how the reduction in private spending is distributed across the three components, but in the long run in our model total private expenditure (C+I+NX) has been crowded out by the full amount of the fiscal expansion.
Note, however, that full crowding out does not occur if the level of potential output, , increases as a result of the fiscal expansion.
Relationship between an icnrease in potential output caused by fiscal expansion and riveate expenditure.
The larger is the increase in potential output caused by a fiscal expansion, the less private expenditure will be crowded out.
What is The Long-term burden of government debt?
We have now seen that in a closed economy, a rise in the government’s budget deficit pushes up interest rates and crowds out domestic investment.
In an open economy, a rise in the deficit also appreciates the currency and crowds out net exports.
In both cases, there may be a cost to future generations. Economists call this cost the long-term burden of government debt.
When will a long-term burden of government debt be present?
Such a burden will be present if the private expenditure that is crowded out would have added more to the economy’s productive capacity than what is added by the government’s expenditure financed by the budget deficit.
Whether government budget deficits harm future generations depends on the nature of the government goods and services being financed by the deficit (and also on the nature of the private expenditure that gets crowded out).
What are the two extreems of when government borrowing may help or hinder future generations?
At one extreme, the government borrowing may finance a project that generates a substantial return to future generations, and thus the future generations may be made better off by today’s budget deficit.
At the other extreme, the government deficit may finance some government program that mainly benefits the current generation. An example might be the government’s financing of temporary cultural or sporting events that benefit the current generation but produce little or no benefits for future generations.