9) developing oral/writting presentational communication Flashcards

0
Q

Explain the difference between:

1) descriptive presentations
2) narratives
3) demonstrations
4) explanatory presentations
5) transformative presentations

A

1) describe someone/thing (experiences/feelings/ppl/places/things)
2) tell a story or describe an event
3) show understanding of HOW something works or instructions
4) create understanding through evidence/justification
5) persuade audience to adopt P.O.V. or rethink an idea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Explain the “presentational” mode of communication.

A
  • one person produces a message in oral/written form for an audience of listeners, viewers or readers.
  • communication is one-way: unlike interpersonal communication, no opportunity exists for the negotiation of meaning to occur between the presenter and those who read, listen to, or view
  • prepared in advance and may require research and planning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the difference between ‘process’ and ‘product?’

A

process: steps involved in producing a written text
product: written text itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the 3 steps to the comprehensive problem-solving model for the writing process by Flower and Hayes (1980s).

A

1) task environment (rhetorical problem, drafts providing direction)
2) writer’s long-term memory
3) writing processes (planning, translating thoughts/ideas to written language, reviewing, monitoring)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In the context of a task environment, what is a ‘rhetorical problem?’

A
  • writing situation/exigency: situation that sparks need to write
  • topic
  • audience
  • writer’s goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Summarize the processes in which writers and speakers engage:

A

1) generating ideas. KEY PHASE: do Ss have lexicon for their work?
2) drafting. 1st step to combining ideas into connected discourse
3) obtaining feedback from instructor/peers (improve accuracy)
4) revising. promote clarity of ideas when can’t negotiate meaning
5) publishing. keep focus on real-world performance/audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some key findings from the research on teaching presentational writing?

A

1) explicit grammar instruction has little/no effect on grammatical accuracy of a written product
2) technology/typing can improve fluency, word count, accuracy
3) the task elicits the type of text students produce
4) type of writing prompt has an effect (bare vs vocab vs prose)
5) training in strategy use can have an effect on writing–increase in self-monitoring and reflecting on writing throughout process
6) process approach prompts Ss to write more w/more organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
Explain the difference between these types of writing prompts:
1) bare prompt
2) vocabulary prompt
3) prose model prompt
Which is the most effective and why?
A

1) BARE: simple explanation of task, presented in English only
2) VOCAB: bare + helpful words/expressions w/Eng definitions
3) PROSE: wording from bare + sample letter w/necessary content and grammatical structures used in context
VOCAB better than BARE; but PROSE had best overall quality, fluency, syntactic complexity an accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the research-based instructional practices encouraged for presentational writing in the FL classroom?

A

1) plenty of in/outside class practice; discuss L1/2 writing process
2) teach ab FL writing process (pre-writing, esp. for ideas and vocab; drafting; sharing/responding; revision; editing; publishing)
3) teach Ss to self-monitor and self-reflect
4) design writing tasks to reflect authentic purposes and genres
5) provide focused practice on syntax
6) distinguish b/n writing for comm vs as an academic exercise
7) combine reading and writing
8) design writing tasks carefully
9) redefine creative writing: create personal meaning in TL
10) integrate a writing conference into instructional approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Idea-generating is the toughest part of writing in the TL for Ss because of vocabulary and grammatical limitations in comparison to the native language. How can teachers help their students?

A

1) provide topics that are familiar and personal to them
2) encourage them to recall words and expressions in the TL associated w/the topic
3) provide enough direction to help them focus on the TL while generating ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What three things must teachers consider when they are teaching the writing process? (think Flower and Hayes)

A

1) rhetorical problem
2) knowledge of topic
3) vocabulary, grammar and syntax needed to write effectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain “reading to write” steps and why it is so effective.

A

1) synthesizing served to design a framework or plan
2) monitoring served to check for accuracy of information and to collect relevant information from the literary text
3) structuring served to select relevant information from the literary text and structure it according to the writer’s intent
4) elaborating served to generate/evaluate/judge ideas
* higher level critical thinking skills along w/higher vocab acquisition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When it comes to idea generation, explain the difference between:

1) semantic mapping / thematic clustering
2) semantic clustering

A

1) grouping words by any number of parts of speech around a thematic topic (ex: frog, green , pond, hopping, swim, slippery)
2) words of a similar syntactical or semantic nature being grouped together (ex: apricot, peach, plum, nectarine, pear)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In relation to presentational communication, what are “cohesive devices?”

List 5 types of cohesive devices.

A

a semantic relation between an element in a text and some other element that is crucial to the interpretation of it

1) reference (ex: pronouns such as ‘he’ or ‘it’ for known nouns)
2) substitution (ex: pronouns such as ‘ones’ for known nouns)
3) ellipsis or deletion of repeated words when referent is known
4) conjunctions (idea connectors)
5) lexical cohesion/repetition of a word/synonym to help meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Appropriate use of cohesive devices leads to higher coherence of texts. What is “coherence” and what are the four conditions of it?

A
  • organization of ideas within a text
    1) development (presentation of ideas = orderly, sense of direction)
    2) continuity (consistency of facts/opinions/perspective/relevancy)
    3) balance (relative emphasis if an idea is a main idea or supportive)
    4) completeness (ideas provide a sufficiently thorough discussion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the difference between “spontaneous” and “reflective” writing.

A

Spontaneous: no time 4: revision, rewriting, clarification, elaboration
Reflective: time to plan and work through writing process of rereading, revising, and rewriting; produces writing that accounts for audience and reception of final written product

16
Q

What formats for presentational communication are most effective in the elementary and middle school levels for DESCRIPTIVE presentational writing and speaking?

A
  • concrete poetry (ex: write ‘el gato’ so it looks like a cat)
  • fixed-form poetry / diamantes (so can play with language)
  • “I used to be…. but now I’m…” Yo era… pero ahora soy….
  • short speeches (ex: ads for city/famous landmark in TL country)
  • PPT/media used to share research w/in a topic of thematic unit
  • video essay/podcast ab Ss school/school life
17
Q

What formats for presentational communication are most effective in the elementary and middle school levels for NARRATIVE presentational writing and speaking?

A
  • plays in which every student has a role
  • sm grp present. of scenes from authentic story in thematic unit
  • student-created skits that tie together the lang and info from unit
  • puppet plays, written by students and presented to audience
  • oral demonstrations: how to do something
18
Q

What two things are needed to design a “task-oriented approach” to teaching writing?

A

1) general situation
2) series of tasks that specify language functions, vocabulary and grammar structures necessary for completing the activity

ex: you have been asked to write a complete description of yourself for the new student files. TASKS: describe yourself physically (function: describe ppl; grammar: adjective position/agreement; vocabulary: hair color, body, face) etc etc

19
Q

What are 5 benefits of computer-assisted writing?

A

1) quality of written work = higher holistic/analytic ratings
2) quantity of writing = longer compositions/more time spent writing
3) writing processes = more experimentation w/lang; more flexible use of writing process
4) revision behavior = more (meanings-based) revisions
5) affective/social outcomes = less apprehension / better attitude

20
Q

Explain this type of feedback on writing, as well as its pros and cons:

NO FEEDBACK

A

look at Ss work to verify completion; no comments/suggestions
-) students like to have feedback
+) intermittent grades on compositions may motivate learners to work harder to increase work length and complexity
+) including ungraded written work in lang classes enables learners to work on developing their writing skills w/out worry ab grades
+) can use portfolio approach with this

21
Q

Explain this type of feedback on writing, as well as its pros and cons:

FOCUS ON CONTENT

A

statements of praise, criticism and suggestions that focus on the overall meaning of what is written rather than grammatical forms
+) learners’ writing skills may improve when teacher responses focus on content rather than on form
+) sentence-level correction doesn’t help Ss avoid surface errors
-) can be difficult to do; easier to see grammatical mistakes

22
Q

Explain this type of feedback on writing, as well as its pros and cons:

FOCUS ON FORM

A

correction of grammatical and vocabulary errors
-) overt correction leads to Ss simply copying w/out thinking ab it
-) produces only surface-level improvements
-) does not transpose to next writing task (ie: don’t learn from it)
+) if teachers are selective about what they correct and place feedback in the margins using a code for what students are looking to correct on their own, it can be effective
+) best when only focus on 2 to 3 issues

23
Q

When should teachers focus on content rather than form when giving feedback, and vice versa?

A
  • if goal = large amounts of writing: content

- if goal = accurate syntax/semantics/grammar: form AND content

24
Q

Explain this type of feedback on writing, as well as its pros and cons:

WRITERS’ WORKSHOPS

A

one-on-one w/teacher or in small groups, meet for revisions
+) touted as best way to give feedback
-) time consuming
-) students need to understand purpose and roles or ineffective

25
Q

What suggestions do students have for teachers when it comes to providing feedback / structure to improve their TL writing?

A

1) more practice; more revision/drafts; quick-writing/short activities
2) personalized/explicit feedback; individualized writing conferences
3) grammatical/rhetorical feedback geared specifically to their level of proficiency and degree of readiness (not too much!!!)
4) more peer interaction/response/revision
5) more student control of nature and extent of instructor feedback
(eg taught to be able to ask for help)
6) more extensive reading of L2 texts, especially models they are expected to imitate

26
Q

Explain the three perspectives of peer revision:

1) prescriptive
2) interpretive
3) collaborative

A

1) focus on form / predetermined notion of what text should be
2) imposing their own ideas ab topic onto text
3) view text from author’s perspective, make suggestions, and did not focus exclusively on form

27
Q

Peer editing means responding with appreciation and positive criticism to your classmates’ writing. It is important because it can:

A
  • help you become more aware of your reader when writing and revising
  • help you become more sensitive to problems in your writing and more confident in correcting them
28
Q

What are some rules to productive and positive peer editing?

A

-be respectful of your classmates’ work
-be conscientious: read carefully and think about what the writer is trying to say
-be tidy and legible in your comments
-be encouraging and make suggestions
-be specific with comments
REMEMBER: you do not need to be an expert at grammar. Your best help is as a reader and that you know when you have been interested, entertained, persuaded or confused.

29
Q

In order for peer reviews to be successful, what does the teacher need to do?

A

-give peer reviewers clear guidelines so that they know what to look for and know what kinds of feedback will be most helpful

30
Q

What are the key implications for FL teachers in terms of feedback research?

A
  • goal for writing determines the effective type of feedback
  • feedback on content encourages Ss to produce more lang and use it creatively; writing improves most when feedback is on content
  • focusing on form will lead to greater accuracy in terms of syntax, semantics and grammar IF it focuses only on 2-3 at once and allows students to self-correct
  • feedback should be given by teachers and peers
  • Ss should be given responsibility for revisions and error correction
  • intermittent evaluation and simple underlining of errors are effective and provide some relief to overburdened teachers
  • peer revision can be successful if learners are given explicit guidelines for how to review each other’s writing
31
Q

Explain the “holistic” method for evaluating writing.

aka “integrative” or “global”

A

rater gives one grade as an overall impression of the entire text, based on a combination of aspects such as clarity, effectiveness of message, control of language, etc.
**most reliable when raters are trained to establish common standards based on practice rating the types of writing samples they will be evaluating

32
Q

Explain the “analytic” method for evaluating writing.

A

rater scores various components of the composition separately and gives specific responses to the learner; scored components may include context, organization, vocabulary, language use, mechanics.
-advantage: offers feedback to show the quality of Ss work in each of the criteria, informing Ss the specific areas they need to improve

33
Q

Explain the “primary trait” method for evaluating writing.

A

rater assigns a holistic score to one particular feature of writing that has been identified in the writing assignment, such as grammatical accuracy or vocabulary usage.
-suggested use: evaluate the quality of a particular mode of discourse, such as explanatory, persuasive, or expressive

34
Q

Explain the “multiple trait” method for evaluating writing.

A

rater assigns a score on several qualities of writing that are important in a particular context or task, and allows the rater to score these qualities relative to each other.
-advantages: allows rater to score some qualities higher than others, particularly w/in a specified context

35
Q

Should we grade pronunciation?

A

YES: if it is interfering with communication (a native speaker would understand them)
NO: if it is not interfering with communication (a native speaker would NOT understand)
thus: work on COMPREHENSIBLE pronunciation rather than PERFECT pronunciation