1) contextualized input, output & interaction Flashcards
Explain the cognitivist theory of second language acquisition.
- Chomsky
- 1960s
- humans are born with an innate ‘language acquisition device” (LAD) that enables them to process language. The LAD contained abstract principals of language that are universal to all languages (Universal Grammar).
- children do not acquire language rules that are outsie of the boundaries of Universal Grammar.
- issue: did not take into account context
Explain the behaviorist theory of second language acquisition.
- Skinner
- 1940s-50s
- people learn through habit formation by repeatedly associating a stimulus with a response; imitation, practice and positive reinforcement were thought to be key components of learning a language
Explain the concept of “Universal Grammar.”
- Chomsky, Cognitive Psychology, 1960s
- humans born with Language Acquisition Device (LAD) that enables them to process language
Explain “competence” and “performance” from the eyes of cognitive psychologists such as Chomsky.
competence: intuitive knowledge of rules of grammar and syntax and how the linguistic system of a language operates
performance: individual’s ability to produce a language
Explain the idea of “communicative competence” and its implications for teachers.
The ability to function in a communicative setting by using not only grammatical knowledge but also gestures and intonation, strategies for making oneself understood, and risk-taking in attempting communication.
Implication for teachers: students need more than grammatical or linguistic knowledge to function in a communicative setting–they need to make meaning of using grammatical forms and knowledge of sociocultural factors that affect communication, knowledge of how to use language to express ideas and intent, and knowledge of strategies of how to compensate for deficiencies in the other competencies.
Explain “discourse competence.”
the way in which language elements, such as words and phrases, are arranged into utterances in order to express a coherent idea on a particular topic
Explain “sociocultural competence.”
knowledge about context, stylistic appropriateness, nonverbal factors, and cultural background knowledge
Explain “linguistic competence”
the ability to make meaning when using form such as morphology, syntax, vocabulary and spelling
Explain “actual competence.”
the ability to match linguistic form with a speaker’s intent
Explain “strategic competence.”
set of skills that enable people to communicate and compensate for deficiencies in the other competencies
Explain the “Input Hypothesis.”
- Krashen, 1980s
- acquisition only occurs when learners receive an optimal quantity of comprehensible input that is interesting, a little beyond their current level of competence ( i + 1 ) and not grammatically sequenced, but understandable using background knowledge, context and other extralinguistic cues such as gestures and intonation.
Explain the “acquisition learning hypothesis.”
- Krashen, 1980s
- acquisition is defined as subconscious ‘picking up’ of rules characteristic of the L1 acquisition process
- learning is a conscious focus on knowing and applying rules
- acquisition,not learning, leads to spontaneous, unplanned communication
Explain the “Monitor Hypothesis.”
- Krashen, 1980s
- conscious knowledge of rules prompts the internal “monitor” that checks, edits and polishes language output
- ‘monitor’ is only used when the language user has sufficient time, attends to linguistic form, and knows the rule being applied
Explain the “Natural Order Hypothesis.”
- Krashen, 1980s
- learners acquire the rules of language in a predictable sequence, in a way that is independent of the oder in which rules may have been taught
- studies have shown learners experience similar stages in development of linguistic structures in spite of first language differences
Explain the “affective filter hypothesis.”
- Krashen, 1980s
- language acquisition must take place in an environment where learners are ‘off the defensive’ and the affective filter (anxiety) is low in order for the input to be noticed and reflected upon by the learner.
Explain how Krashen’s Monitor Model including:
- acquisition-learning hypothesis
-monitor hypothesis
-natural order hypothesis
-input hypothesis
-affective filter hypothesis
have been influential on classroom instruction
- language classrooms should provide comprehensible input at the ( i + 1 ) level in a low anxiety environment where learners do not have to speak until they are ready to do so
- input should be interesting, relevant, and not grammatically sequenced
- error correction should be minimal in the classroom since it is not useful when the goal is acquisition
- teach vocabulary with pictures rather than lists of English equivalent
Why have Krashen’s input theories been strongly criticized?
- his theories have not been empirically tested in language learning environments
- concepts such as ‘comprehensible input’ and the learning-acquisition distinction are not clearly defined or testable
- his model presents a far to simplistic view of the acquisition process
- the use of the ‘acquisition-rich environment’ diminishes the role of the learner by highlighting the role of the teacher as the source of comprehensible input and failing to recognize the function of learner-to-learner talk
Explain “binding.”
- Terrell, 1980s
- the cognitive and affective mental process of linking a meaning to a form.
- the concept of binding is what language teachers refer to when they insist that a new word ultimately be associated directly with its meaning
- in a class setting: presenting vocabulary in meaningful groups, providing meaningful input in presenting vocabulary, using visuals and objects, and engaging students in demonstrating comprehension and acquisition of vocabulary before actually producing it orally or in written for
Explain “Input Processing.”
- application and extension of Krashen’s input theory
- focus on how learners actually process input to connect grammatical forms with their meanings
- VanPatten and Cadierno (1990s-2000s) argue beginning language learners need structured input activities that enable them to focus on meaning while they pay attention to form before they can use the language to produce output
Explain the “processing instruction” approach.
- VanPatten, 2000s
- not a theory, but rather a set of principles about how languages are learned and taught, based on a primary tenet that learners pay attention to meaning before they pay attention to grammatical form.
- also known as ‘attention-orientated instruction’ (Doughty, 2000s)
- learners process the form or structure by means of activities that contain structured input that is manipulated in particular ways to push learners to become dependent on form and structure to get meaning”
Explain the “Noticing Hypothesis.”
- Doughty, 2000s
- SLA is largely driven by what learners pay attention to and notice in target language input and what they understand the significance of noticed input to be
- leads into the idea of ‘attention-oriented instruction’ aka ‘processing instruction’
Explain how the principles of ‘processing instruction’ have impacted classroom instruction.
- in order to make sense of grammatical forms and be able to use them in communication, learners need to be engaged in attending to meaningful input
- mechanical grammar practice is not beneficial for language acquisition