6) interactice approach to develop interpretive communication Flashcards

0
Q

1) Describe the ‘INTERPRETIVE’ mode of communication
2) explain its productive/receptive context in the classroom
3) explain its content in cultural knowledge

A

1) receptive com. of recorded/written text (no author present)
2) receptive: listening, reading, viewing
3) how cultural perspectives/meanings are embedded in products; ability to analyze context and assess linguistic/cultural differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

1) Describe the ‘INTERPERSONAL’ mode of communication
2) explain its productive/receptive context in the classroom
3) explain its content in cultural knowledge

A

1) direct oral/written communication between ppl
2) productive: speaking, writing; receptive: listening, reading
3) cultural perspectives governing interactions (ex: b/n ppl of different ages, statues, backgrounds); ability to recognize languages use different practices and patterns to communicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1) Describe the ‘PRESENTATIONAL’ mode of communication
2) explain its productive/receptive context in the classroom
3) explain its content in cultural knowledge

A

1) productive oral/written communication for an audience
2) productive: speaking, writing, showing
3) cultural perspectives for interactions w/audience; ability to present cross-cultural info based on audience background; ability to recognize cultures use different patterns of interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the term “schemata” or “schema.”

A

the mental connections that allow new experiences and information to be aligned with previous knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the ‘Schema Theory” in relation to interpretive communication.

A

draws attention to constructive nature of the reading process and the critical role of the reader and the interaction between the text and the reader’s background knowledge.
-reader must be able to like incoming spoken/written input to the knowledge and bank of experiences they already have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Listening and reading involve the following social and cognitive processes; as listeners/readers interpret a text, they draw upon:

A
  • knowledge of TL (vocab, syntax, etc)
  • background knowledge/experiences in the world
  • knowledge a/b how types of discourse are organized (ex: radio ad)
  • ability to hold info in short-term memory as they attend to the text
  • ability to use strategies to help bring meaning and comprhension
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain bottom-up processing in relation to reading and listening.

A
  • meaning understood through analysis of language parts
  • lang processes = sequential: sounds to word to phrases
  • comprehension = text driven; approach reading in a linear matter
    ex: ID sounds/letters/word order patterns/intonation cues; analyzing sentence structure/word endings; translation of individual words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain top-down processing in relation to reading and listening.

A
  • meaning derived through contextual cues and activation of prior background knowledge about context of the text
  • reader-driven; focus on world knowledge reader brings to text
    ex: ID key ideas; meaning through “psycholinguistic guessing”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What should teachers use when teaching reading and writing skills: top-down or bottom-up processing?

A

BOTH! :) listener/reader arrives at meaning using both in concert
TOP/DOWN factors, reader: background and perspective
TOP/DOWN factors, text: topic, structure, episodic sequence
BOTTOM/UP factors, text and reader: illustrative detail; surface lang features (letters, words, etc); reader lang proficiency level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the “look-back-and-lift-off approach” to reading and listening comprehension.

A
  • when questions are worded in such a way as to reveal the answer to students by looking at the passage and making a ‘match.’
  • students arrive at correct answer but may have no idea what either the question or answer means
  • students rarely read entire pasage (unconnected fragments of info)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the term “discourse signaling cues.”

A

metalinguistic devices that function as directional guides to signal how readers and listeners should interpret the incoming information

  • previews (ex: there are 4 stages to culture shock)
  • summarizers (ex: to sum up so far…)
  • emphasis markers (ex: this is the key…)
  • logical connectives (ex: and, first, second, next…)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the similarities and differences between listening and reading texts.

A

same: draw upon knowledge of TL, background knowledge, context cues, cognitive processing skills, comprehension strategies
different:
written=presentational, intended for audience; coherent paragraphs
spoken=can included ungrammatical/reduced forms; included pauses, hesitations, fillers; topics can shift as as conversation is co-constructed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can teachers accommodate for topic familiarity and short-term/working memory when reading/listening?

A

1) topic familiarity (background knowledge)
2) short-term/working memory (ability to hold information in mind)
- limit load on memory by preparing for task (ex explain activity and its purpose; previewing activities; post-activities)
- allow to have printed text available and/or view multiple times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the difference between “extensive” and “intensive” reading.

A

EXTENSIVE: for pleasure; requires ability to understand main ideas, find specific info, read quickly
INTENSIVE: for information; requires ability to read for details, understand implications; follow relationships of thought throughout text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the “READER/LISTENER-BASED” and “TEXT-BASED” variables that affect comprehension and interpretation of a oral or printed text?

A

1) reader/listener-based factors: familiarity w/topic, use of memory; use of strategies; purpose of listening/reading/viewing, anxiety level
2) text-based factors: text length, text organization, context/interest, vocabulary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are four types of ineffective learner behaviors that lead to incorrect guessing for comprehension?

A

1) inattentive use of context clues (not paying attention to context)
2) “oblivious certainty” (attitude: I KNOW word! despite context)
3) overuse of ‘just-get-the-gist’ method (can lead to contentment w/superficial understanding even if it isn’t sufficient for task-at-hand)
4) use of misplaced guesses based upon memory of the story

16
Q

Explain the terms “chains of signification” and “rechaining” and how this can be accomplished by teachers.

A

how meanings of words change

1) validating student TL contributions, not judging any “off task”
2) restating in more adult-like ways while giving student credit
3) tying complex ideas of symbolism/theme to concrete examples from students’ lives and other texts
4) taking advantage of opportunities to offer literacy interpretations, enabling students to rechain lexical items constantly

17
Q

In comprehension questions, should the questions be in the native language or the target language?

A

-Ss score higher when it is in the native language
-higher recall, inferences, elaborations, metacognitive statements
if DO use TL to test, make sure to have:
1) ask q’s that circumvent potential problem of understanding q’s
2) q’s preclude possibility of answering correctly w/out understanding (can’t use “lift method” to answer)
3) device that would prevent mistaking limited writing skills for limited reading comprehension