8. The Behavioural Economics of Incentives Flashcards

1
Q

Piece rate incentives

A

Where a worker is paid per unit they produce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Up to what point do payoff maximisers exert effort?

A

Up to the point where MC of an additional unit of effort is equal to the MR for the additional unit of effort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the real effort task experiment?

A

An electronic simulation of catching balls in a tray, there are points for catching the ball and points deducted for every click since this is the cost of effort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Results of real effort task

A
  • effort isn’t changed as long as cost/ prize ratio is the same
  • increasing cost of clicks, reduces clicks
  • increasing prize, increase clicks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the production function of catches in the real effort task

A

Production function catches = f(clicks, Ę)

Increasing, concave, stable across different prize levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Results of real effort task, team production

A

In team people get less cooperative over time but are still not fully selfish

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Results of gift exchange real effort task

A

Much stronger relationship between effort and wages with partner than stranger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Results of tournament real effort task

A

People play as selfish expected payoff maximisers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Results of NYC taxi driver observations

A

Drivers work less when wages are higher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why do NYC taxi drivers work less when wages are higher?

A

They have daily income targets and reference dependent preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe experiment 1 of Fehr and Gatte 2007

A
  • In treatment period 1 group A of Swiss couriers were given a pay rise, group B held constant.
  • In treatment period 2 group B get pay rise, group A held constant.
  • find changes in shifts taken and effort
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Results of experiment 1 Fehr and Gatte

A

Group with higher wage worked more shifts but less effort since they are consistent with reference dependent preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe experiment 2 of Fehr and Gatte?

A

Couriers engaged in two part gamble choice that showed if they were loss averse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Results of experiment 2 of Fehr and Gatte

A
  • both type of couriers increase shifts with wages

* Non loss averse couriers hold effort when wage is increased but loss averse couriers drop effort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Incentive comparability constraint

A

It must align the incentives of the agent and the principal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Participation constraint

A

The agent must want to accept the contract

17
Q

Describe the principal agent experiment (Anderhub, Gächter)

A
  • A firm owner employs an expert to run the firm
  • the expert can accept or reject offer
  • expert chooses how much effort to put into the firm
  • expert is paid fixed payment and share of revenue, owner gets the rest
18
Q

Results of principal agent experiment

A
  • majority of contracts had negative fixed payments
  • share =100% was most common offer but lots were lower
  • contracts were almost completely between the participation constraint and equally split
  • experts are much more likely to reject contract if s is low
  • evidence of fairness considerations
19
Q

Are the experts effort choices rational?

A
  • when offered low s, experts put in less effort than rational
  • when offered high s, experts put in more effort than rational
  • evidence of reciprocity
20
Q

Describe the experiment a fine is a price Gneezy and Rustichini 2000)

A

To prevent parents being late picking their kids up from school, a fine was introduced

21
Q

Results of a fine is a price experiment

A
  • once fine was introduced, the number of late parents more than doubled
  • after fine was removed, the number stayed at high level
  • introducing the fine changed a relationship based on good wills into a transactional relationship in which the fine is the price for being late
22
Q

Describe the experimental design of the investor and the trustee

A

•both receive 10 monetary units each
•investor can send 0-10 to the trustee, amount sent is tripled
•trustee sends back any amount they want
•treatments
Trust condition: as above
Investor condition: investor can choose to have the trustee fined if they send back less than the desired amount

23
Q

What are the results of the investor and trustee experiment?

A
  • the higher the amount sent, the higher the amount sent back
  • incentive condition- fine imposed saw lower transfers back
  • incentive condition- fine not imposed saw even higher transfers back