7 - Social Categorisation Flashcards
Sherif et al., study on group formation
Robbers Cave
Phase 1 (group formation):
- two groups brought to a camp on different days
- groups labelled themselves
- lots of ingroup activities, minimal outgroup contact
- different base locations
Phase 2 (friction phase) [aim to create conflict]:
- 5 day tournament with zero-sum reward (one group receives penknives)
Findings:
- day 1: good sportsmanship
- day 2: name-calling, outgroup aggression and retaliation
> them vs us
> derogation of outgroup (treat with little worth)
> ethnocentrism formed (preference for members of one’s own group over members of another group)
Phase 3 (conflict reduction):
- will increased contact between groups help
- will there be greater reduction in conflict if they pursue common goals
> problems requiring joint effort of both groups
Findings:
- increased contact alone is insufficient, may even worsen the ethnocentrism
- after collaboratively achieving goals:
> generosity improved
> friendships grew
> less negative ratings of outgroup members
Realistic Conflict Theory
- Intergroup conflicts arise from a real conflict of group interests
- pursuit of scarce, zero-sum resources causes competition
- intergroup competition causes:
> frustration
> intragroup solidarity
> outgroup derogation - the pursuit of interdependent goals builds cooperation and relationships
The Contact Hypothesis (Allport, 1954)
- contact between competing groups can reduce prejudice
Optimal Conditions for prejudice reduction: - groups of equal status
- common goals
- intergroup cooperations
- support from authorities
Tajfel et al. (197g1) on resource allocation
- found that people allocate more resources to their group
- also that people favour conditions where the ingroup receives more resources relative to the outgroup (even if the alternative is that they receive more total resources)
Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979)
People have a fundamental desire to be socially connected to other people
- group membership provides self-esteem
- we feel best when our group is in a better position than other groups (occurs via securing more resources)
- when identifying with a group, we create a ‘prototype’ image of a person in that group
- this prototype influences the ways in which we behave, feel and think
Terror Management Theory
- awareness of our inevitable death causes terror
- self-esteem protects against anxiety
- death threatens self-esteem thus provoking anxiety
- by subscribing to a cultural ‘worldview’ we protect our self-esteem from mortality-related anxiety
- specific groups provide specific worldviews, will this result in conflict?
Integrating Social Identity Theory and Terror Management Theory
- people join groups because group identities boost self-esteem
- via providing them with a worldview, which by accepting, staves off the anxiety caused by consideration of mortality