7 – Memory 2 Flashcards
Describe the traditional multistore model of memory (Atkinson and Shifrin, 1968)?
- Sensory stores, e.g. iconic memory
- Short-term memory
- Long-term memory
In the traditional multistore model of memory (Atkinson and Shifrin, 1968), how does information get from the sensory stores to short-term memory?
Through attention.
In the traditional multistore model of memory (Atkinson and Shifrin, 1968), how does information get from short-term memory to long-term memory?
Through rehearsal.
In STM letter-span tasks, how many items do people normally remember?
7 +- 2 is magic number.
In STM letter-span tasks, what if they have to count out loud while remembering?
They remember fewer letters. They can’t rehearse by mentally repeating numbers, as counting uses the same code –speech system – as you use to rehearse.
In STM letter-span tasks, what if letters sound the same?
It’s harder. Because speech-based phonological code used for rehearsal.
In STM letter-span tasks, what if words are used instead of letters?
It’s easier. But long words harder than short –because of phonological rehearsal. Ditto for unconnected words vs connected, which allow for use of semantic cues.
What is the capacity of STM according to the traditional multistore model of memory (Atkinson and Shifrin, 1968)?
7 +-2
How quickly does information decay from STM?
Within 30 seconds if not rehearsed.
In the traditional multistore model of memory (Atkinson and Shifrin, 1968), what is the capacity and rate of forgetting of the LTM?
Capacity – unlimited
Forgetting happens due to interference rather than decay
According to the traditional multistore model of memory (Atkinson and Shifrin, 1968), how does information end up in LTM?
Information first must be attended to and registered in iconic memory. Then it must be rehearsed for it to be transferred to LTM.
Give two examples why repetition is not sufficient for encoding?
- Craik and Watkins (1973) gave list of words to Pps, told only to remember last word with the letter G. They could estimate how many times each G word is rehearsed based on the number of items between each G word. Found no difference in level of recall for words as function of how many times they were rehearsed.
- Kellas et al. (1975) Memory better when people rehearse silently rather than out loud. It was hypothesised that when people didn’t have to engage in overt rehearsal, they were also doing OTHER things to these items –e.g. semantically processing and integrating –that accounted for better performance.
What are the three levels of encoding in Craik and Lockhart’s levels of processing hypothesis (1975)?
Shallow –e.g. how many letters does this word have?
Intermediate –e.g. does this word rhyme with ‘treat’?
Deep semantic – e.g. Truck. Do you find these in a city?
What three forms of semantic organisation have been shown to enhance memory?
- Categorisation at encoding
- When more elaboration is encouraged during encoding
- When material is self-relevant (e.g. instead of parsing adjectives into positive and negative, separate them into those that do/don’t apply to you)
Does depth of processing (Craik and Lockhart, 1975) explain how memory works?
No, it just describes what kind of encoding encourages more long-lasting memories. It doesn’t tell us how and in what forms memories are stored.