6.4: Drug therapies Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks)

A

There are two types of antipsychotics:

  1. Typical (traditional)
  2. Typical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics

A

Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
How can chlorpromazine be taken?

A

Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics

A

Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means what?

A

Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
What does this do?

A

This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics

A

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples

A

Two examples are:

  1. Clozapine
  2. Risperidone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.

A

After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects,

A

Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone

A

Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics

A

Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone

A

Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone

A

Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics

A

Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

First AO3 PEEL paragraph

A

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
Example

A

For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this,

A

As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
Example

A

For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed

20
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
Why is this a great strength of antipsychotics?

A

This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment

21
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also

A

Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care

22
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
What do they also do?

A

They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative

23
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
What does this further support?

A

This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia

24
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

Second AO3 PEEL paragraph

A

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness

25
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
Example

A

For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients

26
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
What is this not the same as saying?

A

This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis

27
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
What does this suggest?

A

This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought

28
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

Third AO3 PEEL paragraph

A

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal

29
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics

A

Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking

30
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking.
The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics

A

The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which results in high temperature, delirium and coma, and can be fatal

31
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking.
The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which results in high temperature, delirium and coma, and can be fatal.
Atypical antipsychotics

A

Atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects because of their mechanism of action, but the side effects still exist and patients taking clozapine have to have regular blood tests to alert doctors to early signs of agranulocytosis

32
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking.
The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which results in high temperature, delirium and coma, and can be fatal.
Atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects because of their mechanism of action, but the side effects still exist and patients taking clozapine have to have regular blood tests to alert doctors to early signs of agranulocytosis.
Why are side effects thus a significant limitation of antipsychotics?

A

Side effects are thus a significant limitation of antipsychotics, because the side effects can be so distressing for patients that they stop taking the medication entirely, which then impacts the effectiveness of them

33
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking.
The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which results in high temperature, delirium and coma, and can be fatal.
Atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects because of their mechanism of action, but the side effects still exist and patients taking clozapine have to have regular blood tests to alert doctors to early signs of agranulocytosis.
Side effects are thus a significant limitation of antipsychotics, because the side effects can be so distressing for patients that they stop taking the medication entirely, which then impacts the effectiveness of them.
Nevertheless,

A

Nevertheless, atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects than typical antipsychotics, suggesting that people are more likely to continue with them and so are more likely to see a reduction in symptoms

34
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking.
The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which results in high temperature, delirium and coma, and can be fatal.
Atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects because of their mechanism of action, but the side effects still exist and patients taking clozapine have to have regular blood tests to alert doctors to early signs of agranulocytosis.
Side effects are thus a significant limitation of antipsychotics, because the side effects can be so distressing for patients that they stop taking the medication entirely, which then impacts the effectiveness of them.
Nevertheless, atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects than typical antipsychotics, suggesting that people are more likely to continue with them and so are more likely to see a reduction in symptoms.
What does this show?

A

This shows that antipsychotics may not be appropriate for all patients and so should be prescribed with caution

35
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking.
The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which results in high temperature, delirium and coma, and can be fatal.
Atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects because of their mechanism of action, but the side effects still exist and patients taking clozapine have to have regular blood tests to alert doctors to early signs of agranulocytosis.
Side effects are thus a significant limitation of antipsychotics, because the side effects can be so distressing for patients that they stop taking the medication entirely, which then impacts the effectiveness of them.
Nevertheless, atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects than typical antipsychotics, suggesting that people are more likely to continue with them and so are more likely to see a reduction in symptoms.
This shows that antipsychotics may not be appropriate for all patients and so should be prescribed with caution.

Fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph

A

The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that it would be more effectual/efficacious to combine antipsychotics and psychological treatments for schizophrenia, compared to only antipsychotics and there is research support for the effectiveness of this

36
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking.
The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which results in high temperature, delirium and coma, and can be fatal.
Atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects because of their mechanism of action, but the side effects still exist and patients taking clozapine have to have regular blood tests to alert doctors to early signs of agranulocytosis.
Side effects are thus a significant limitation of antipsychotics, because the side effects can be so distressing for patients that they stop taking the medication entirely, which then impacts the effectiveness of them.
Nevertheless, atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects than typical antipsychotics, suggesting that people are more likely to continue with them and so are more likely to see a reduction in symptoms.
This shows that antipsychotics may not be appropriate for all patients and so should be prescribed with caution.

The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that it would be more effectual/efficacious to combine antipsychotics and psychological treatments for schizophrenia, compared to only antipsychotics and there is research support for the effectiveness of this.
Why is this?

A

This is because as Turkington et al. (2006) point out, it is not possible to adopt a purely biological approach and simultaneously treat schizophrenics with CBT to relieve psychological symptoms – it requires adopting an interactionist model

37
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking.
The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which results in high temperature, delirium and coma, and can be fatal.
Atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects because of their mechanism of action, but the side effects still exist and patients taking clozapine have to have regular blood tests to alert doctors to early signs of agranulocytosis.
Side effects are thus a significant limitation of antipsychotics, because the side effects can be so distressing for patients that they stop taking the medication entirely, which then impacts the effectiveness of them.
Nevertheless, atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects than typical antipsychotics, suggesting that people are more likely to continue with them and so are more likely to see a reduction in symptoms.
This shows that antipsychotics may not be appropriate for all patients and so should be prescribed with caution.

The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that it would be more effectual/efficacious to combine antipsychotics and psychological treatments for schizophrenia, compared to only antipsychotics and there is research support for the effectiveness of this.
This is because as Turkington et al. (2006) point out, it is not possible to adopt a purely biological approach and simultaneously treat schizophrenics with CBT to relieve psychological symptoms – it requires adopting an interactionist model.
Example

A

For example, Tarrier et al. (2004) randomly allocated 315 patients to a medication and CBT group, medication and supportive counselling group or a control group of medication only.
Patients in the two combination groups showed lower symptom levels than those in the control group

38
Q

Describe and evaluate antipsychotics as a treatment for schizophrenia (16 marks).
There are two types of antipsychotics - typical (traditional) and atypical.
Typical antipsychotics have been around since the 1950s and include Chlorpromazine.
Chlorpromazine can be taken as tablets, syrup or by injection (the maximum dosage for most patients is 400 to 800 mg), but according to Liu and de Haan (2009), typical prescribed doses have declined over the last 50 years.
Typical antipsychotics are dopamine antagonists, which means that they reduce dopamine activity by blocking dopamine receptors at the synapse.
This reduces positive symptoms such as hallucinations and has a calming, sedative effect.

Atypical antipsychotics have been used since the 1970s and there are a range of atypical antipsychotics, but they do not all work in the same way.
Two examples are clozapine and risperidone.
After being withdrawn in the 1970s following the deaths of some patients from a blood condition, agranulocytosis, clozapine was withdrawn, but in the 1980s when it was discovered to be more effective than typical antipsychotics, clozapine was remarketed as a treatment for schizophrenia to be used when other treatments failed.
Because of its potentially fatal side effects, clozapine is not available as an injection and the daily dosage is slightly lower than for chlorpromazine, typically 300 to 450 mg.
Risperidone has been around since the 1990s and was developed in an attempt to produce a drug as affective as clozapine, but without its serious side effects.
Atypical antipsychotics block dopamine receptors and also act on other neurotransmitters such as glutamate and serotonin.
Risperidone binds more strongly to dopamine receptors than clozapine and is therefore effective in much smaller doses than most antipsychotics.
Like chlorpromazine, risperidone can be taken in the form of tablets, syrup or an injection, but the maximum typical daily dose is 12mg.
Atypical antipsychotics address the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as avolition.

The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for both typical and atypical antipsychotics being effective in treating the symptoms of schizophrenia.
For example, Thornley et al. (2003) reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine and a placebo. Data from 13 trials of 1,121 participants found that chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity.
Data from 3 trials of 512 participants found that the relapse rate was also lower when chlorpromazine was taken.
As well as this, there is also support for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics.
For example, in a review, Meltzer (2012) concluded that clozapine is more effective than typical antipsychotics and other atypical antipsychotics, and that it is effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed.
This is a great strength of antipsychotics, because it shows that antipsychotics are effective and also appropriate for many schizophrenics, including seemingly treatment-resistant cases, meaning that antipsychotics are applicable to many cases of schizophrenia for treatment.
Antipsychotics also enhance the quality of life for patients, as they allow them to live independently or outside of institutional care.
They also enhance the quality of life for family members who are able to live their lives rather than continuously care for their relative.
This further supports the appropriateness of antipsychotics to treat schizophrenia.

The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there are issues with the evidence for the effectiveness of antipsychotics, as there have been some vigorous challenges to their usefulness.
For example, Healy (2012) argues that some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, exaggerating the evidence for positive effects.
As antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, it is easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effect on patients.
This is not the same as saying they really reduce the severity of psychosis.
This suggests that the effectiveness of drug therapies to treat schizophrenia may be over-exaggerated and so may not be as effective as initially thought.

The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that a weakness of antipsychotics is the likelihood of side effects, ranging from the mild to the serious to the fatal.
Typical antipsychotics are associated with a range of side effects including dizziness, agitation and sleepiness and long-term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, which manifests as involuntary facial movements such as grimacing, blinking and lip smacking.
The most serious side effect of typical antipsychotics is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), which results in high temperature, delirium and coma, and can be fatal.
Atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects because of their mechanism of action, but the side effects still exist and patients taking clozapine have to have regular blood tests to alert doctors to early signs of agranulocytosis.
Side effects are thus a significant limitation of antipsychotics, because the side effects can be so distressing for patients that they stop taking the medication entirely, which then impacts the effectiveness of them.
Nevertheless, atypical antipsychotics have fewer side effects than typical antipsychotics, suggesting that people are more likely to continue with them and so are more likely to see a reduction in symptoms.
This shows that antipsychotics may not be appropriate for all patients and so should be prescribed with caution.

The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that it would be more effectual/efficacious to combine antipsychotics and psychological treatments for schizophrenia, compared to only antipsychotics and there is research support for the effectiveness of this.
This is because as Turkington et al. (2006) point out, it is not possible to adopt a purely biological approach and simultaneously treat schizophrenics with CBT to relieve psychological symptoms – it requires adopting an interactionist model.
For example, Tarrier et al. (2004) randomly allocated 315 patients to a medication and CBT group, medication and supportive counselling group or a control group of medication only.
Patients in the two combination groups showed lower symptom levels than those in the control group.
What does this illustrate?

A

This illustrates the usefulness of adopting an interactionist approach in the treatment of schizophrenia and therefore using antipsychotics as part of a combined treatment for schizophrenia, along with a therapy such as CBT, since it is more effective

39
Q

‘Therapies can be time-consuming and, in some cases, uncomfortable for the client. It is, therefore, very important to offer the most appropriate and effective type of treatment.’

Outline and evaluate two or more therapies used in the treatment of schizophrenia (16 marks)
What would your two therapies for AO1 be?

A

Your two therapies for AO1 would be drug therapy and CBT.

For CBT, give a firm example of it in action, for example test thoughts of … by …

40
Q

‘Therapies can be time-consuming and, in some cases, uncomfortable for the client. It is, therefore, very important to offer the most appropriate and effective type of treatment.’

Outline and evaluate two or more therapies used in the treatment of schizophrenia (16 marks)
Your two therapies for AO1 would be drug therapy and CBT.
For CBT, give a firm example of it in action, for example test thoughts of … by ….

AO3:
Effective

Appropriate - Drugs can treat severe

A

Appropriate - Drugs can treat severe positive and negative symptoms

41
Q

‘Therapies can be time-consuming and, in some cases, uncomfortable for the client. It is, therefore, very important to offer the most appropriate and effective type of treatment.’

Outline and evaluate two or more therapies used in the treatment of schizophrenia (16 marks)
Your two therapies for AO1 would be drug therapy and CBT.
For CBT, give a firm example of it in action, for example test thoughts of … by ….

AO3:
Effective

Appropriate - Drugs can treat severe positive and negative symptoms

Time-consuming - CBT

A

Time-consuming - The individual sessions of CBT are usually atleast an hour and a one-off session would not be the most effective for a schizophrenic - the sessions would have to be over a long-term basis and this would take more time

42
Q

‘Therapies can be time-consuming and, in some cases, uncomfortable for the client. It is, therefore, very important to offer the most appropriate and effective type of treatment.’

Outline and evaluate two or more therapies used in the treatment of schizophrenia (16 marks)
Your two therapies for AO1 would be drug therapy and CBT.
For CBT, give a firm example of it in action, for example test thoughts of … by ….

AO3:
Effective

Appropriate - Drugs can treat severe positive and negative symptoms

Time-consuming - The individual sessions of CBT are usually atleast an hour and a one-off session would not be the most effective for a schizophrenic - the sessions would have to be over a long-term basis and this would take more time

Uncomfortable - CBT

A

Uncomfortable - CBT is more uncomfortable than drugs, because it is more invasive, as it is more personal.
CBT is also only appropriate if the symptoms are controlled by drugs, as they need motivation to engage

43
Q

‘Therapies can be time-consuming and, in some cases, uncomfortable for the client. It is, therefore, very important to offer the most appropriate and effective type of treatment.’

Outline and evaluate two or more therapies used in the treatment of schizophrenia (16 marks)
Your two therapies for AO1 would be drug therapy and CBT.
For CBT, give a firm example of it in action, for example test thoughts of … by ….

AO3:
Effective

Appropriate - Drugs can treat severe positive and negative symptoms

Time-consuming - The individual sessions of CBT are usually atleast an hour and a one-off session would not be the most effective for a schizophrenic - the sessions would have to be over a long-term basis and this would take more time

Uncomfortable - CBT is more uncomfortable than drugs, because it is more invasive, as it is more personal.
CBT is also only appropriate if the symptoms are controlled by drugs, as they need motivation to engage.
However,

A

However, drugs are uncomfortable because of their side effects and the long-term risks/side effects, too

44
Q

‘Therapies can be time-consuming and, in some cases, uncomfortable for the client. It is, therefore, very important to offer the most appropriate and effective type of treatment.’

Outline and evaluate two or more therapies used in the treatment of schizophrenia (16 marks)
Your two therapies for AO1 would be drug therapy and CBT.
For CBT, give a firm example of it in action, for example test thoughts of … by ….

AO3:
Effective

Appropriate - Drugs can treat severe positive and negative symptoms

Time-consuming - The individual sessions of CBT are usually atleast an hour and a one-off session would not be the most effective for a schizophrenic - the sessions would have to be over a long-term basis and this would take more time

Uncomfortable - CBT is more uncomfortable than drugs, because it is more invasive, as it is more personal.
CBT is also only appropriate if the symptoms are controlled by drugs, as they need motivation to engage.
However, drugs are uncomfortable because of their side effects and the long-term risks/side effects, too.

Speak of how it undermines

A

Speak of how it undermines the cause of schizophrenia

45
Q

‘Therapies can be time-consuming and, in some cases, uncomfortable for the client. It is, therefore, very important to offer the most appropriate and effective type of treatment.’

Outline and evaluate two or more therapies used in the treatment of schizophrenia (16 marks)
Your two therapies for AO1 would be drug therapy and CBT.
For CBT, give a firm example of it in action, for example test thoughts of … by ….

AO3:
Effective

Appropriate - Drugs can treat severe positive and negative symptoms

Time-consuming - The individual sessions of CBT are usually atleast an hour and a one-off session would not be the most effective for a schizophrenic - the sessions would have to be over a long-term basis and this would take more time

Uncomfortable - CBT is more uncomfortable than drugs, because it is more invasive, as it is more personal.
CBT is also only appropriate if the symptoms are controlled by drugs, as they need motivation to engage.
However, drugs are uncomfortable because of their side effects and the long-term risks/side effects, too.

Speak of how it undermines the cause of schizophrenia, how?

A

Speak of how it undermines the cause of schizophrenia, because if drug therapy only masks the symptoms and they come back when drug therapy is stopped, then schizophrenia can’t be fully biological and if CBT is ineffective for all patients, then the cause of schizophrenia can’t be purely psychological either

46
Q

‘Therapies can be time-consuming and, in some cases, uncomfortable for the client. It is, therefore, very important to offer the most appropriate and effective type of treatment.’

Outline and evaluate two or more therapies used in the treatment of schizophrenia (16 marks)
Your two therapies for AO1 would be drug therapy and CBT.
For CBT, give a firm example of it in action, for example test thoughts of … by ….

AO3:
Effective

Appropriate - Drugs can treat severe positive and negative symptoms

Time-consuming - The individual sessions of CBT are usually atleast an hour and a one-off session would not be the most effective for a schizophrenic - the sessions would have to be over a long-term basis and this would take more time

Uncomfortable - CBT is more uncomfortable than drugs, because it is more invasive, as it is more personal.
CBT is also only appropriate if the symptoms are controlled by drugs, as they need motivation to engage.
However, drugs are uncomfortable because of their side effects and the long-term risks/side effects, too.

Speak of how it undermines the cause of schizophrenia, because if drug therapy only masks the symptoms and they come back when drug therapy is stopped, then schizophrenia can’t be fully biological and if CBT is ineffective for all patients, then the cause of schizophrenia can’t be purely psychological either.

End by saying how what is better?

A

End by saying how a combination of drug therapy and CBT is better (interactionist approach), with Tarrier as supporting evidence