6. Shared Value- Patagonia Flashcards
Is stakeholder engagement always the best strategy to deal with stakeholders?
- Designing a strategy with shareholder engagement is good but it’s not always the best strategy
- Stakeholder engagement can be dangerous if the company is not ready
- Sometimes stakeholder engagement is useless/ E.G. Fiat example
The Shell Case
- The Brent Spar Accident = Environmental
- Human rights in Nigeria = Violation of human rights
- Lost legitimacy because of questionable behaviors in both cases
- Decided to conduct a stakeholder engagement program to gain legitimacy
The Shell Case- Problems with Stakeholder
- Problem was not environmental and human right violence but Inconsistent values within the stakeholders
- Not a good example for CSR
- Shell was not ready to interact with stakeholders
- Shell was not ready manage stakeholders’ expectations
- Shell was just interested in washing its public
Stakeholder management or stakeholder slavery?
- Problems with stakeholder priorities
- Schizophrenia of stakeholders’ expectations
- Engagement is resource consuming
- Accountability issues
- Golden rule = Be truly committed and ready to open the boundaries of the organization!
Fiat/Chrysler CEO Case
- Fiat acquired Chrysler to transform it to make is profitable and innovative
- Inefficient cost structure resulted in firing people in his own country
- Sergio Marchionne closed the dialog with the Italian labor unions because of their 1. lack of power and 2. urgency legitimacy as a specific shareholder
- All other stakeholders agreed with him/ E.G. Media, Suppliers
- He had legitimacy because economic responsibility was required by society
Caroll’s four-part model of corporate social responsibility
- Philantropie Responsibilities = Desired by society/ Top
- Ethical Responsibilities = Expected by society
- Legal Responsibilities = Required by society
- Economic Responsibilities = Required by society/ Bottom
- True social responsibility requires the meeting of all four levels
Shared value creation
- Interface of = Society needs/ Business opportunities/Corporate assets, skill, capabilities
- Company should use society needs to open new business opportunities with its corporate assets, skills, and capabilities!
From CSR to Shared Value
- CSR = Companies integrate on a voluntary basis social and environmental concern in their business operations and their interaction with their stakeholders
- CSV = Financial success does not need to come at the expense of society or environment/ Shared value supports a positive impact for all parties involved
From CSR to CSV: Strategic implications
- First CSR & Second CSV
- Doing good vs. Doing well and doing good
- Citizenship and Philanthropy vs. Joint Social & Company value
- Discretionary or in response of external pressure vs. Integral competing
- Separate from profit maximization vs. Integrate into profit maximization
- Agenda determined by external reporting and personal preferences/ In every company the same structure vs. Agenda is company specific
- Impact limited by corporate footprint & CSR budget vs. Realigns the entire company budget
How can a company create shared value?
- Redefining productivity in value chains (Coca Cola Water Reduction)
- Reconceiving products and markets (Vodafone Africa)
- Building supportive clusters (Nespresso Coffee)
Redefining productivity in value chain
- Search for possibilities to scale the economic value created in the value chain by leveraging societal weaknesses?
- Assess economic risk cause by societal & environmental issues
- Identify possible partnerships
Coca-Cola- Water Reduction
- Saving water = Restructuring the value chain to reduce cost and raise efficiency
- Strategy has enabled Coca-Cola to obtain 24% reduction of water since 2004
- Partnership with WWF
Coca Cola reducing plastic pollution
- Collect back every bottle they put on the market by 2030
- Achieving a specific goal of the company while reducing the environmental footprint
- Partnership with NGOs and governments
Reconceiving products and markets
- Addressing all potential customer’s needs
- Evaluate Bottom of the pyramid markets
- Provide appropriate services to lower income and disadvantaged consumers
Vodafone Africa
- Increasing use of mobile phones in Africa (Customer need)
- Invention of a mobile banking service to withdraw and send money with mobile device
- Creating value beyond communication = Rose and create new markets and getting a competitive advantage/ E.G. Sending money to Banana farms to increase profitability
Building supportive clusters at the company
- Build clusters to improve company and productivity in developing countries
- Build open and transparent market
- Provide partners with skills and capabilities
- Support partners’ efficiency and high quality production
Nespresso Coffee
- Objective = Double the amount of coffee bought directly from farmers
- Value for Nestle = More secure supply and better-quality raw materials/ Consumer preferences for Nestle products/ Lower procurement costs
- Value for farmers = Advise and technical assistance/ Increased income/ Employment/ Long-term safe partnership
The four cornerstones of shared value
- Clear Purpose = Mission & Values
- Corporate Engagement
- Stakeholder communication
- Collaborative cocreation = Partnerships
- Helps to Identify the key area where to invest
Mars
- Making the key source more productive is creating shared value
- Shared outcome = More money for farmers and more income for Mars
- Respecting all 4 cornerstones of shared value
- Motivation could be = Ethics/ Legitimacy/ Profitability
Patagonia Four Cornerstones of shared value- Clear purpose (mission & values)
- Best product
- Low environmental harm
- Inspire others
Patagonia Four Cornerstones of shared value- Corporate engagement
- HR = Special selection by “dirtbag” characteristics and environmental concern and value fit/ Environmentally benefits as incentives/ Environmentally engineered company buildings
- Marketing/ Sales = No money waste in marketing
- Operation & logistics = Suppliers that are consistent with Patagonia’s values (Bluesign)/ Technologies as an audit measure/ Large R&D department
- In general = 1% Donation/ Top-down approach/ Leadership commitment
Patagonia Four Cornerstones of shared value- Collaborative co-creation:
- Competitors = Sharing Innovation/ Education of the issue
- NGO
- Environmental groups
- Ambassadors
Patagonia Four Cornerstones of shared value- Stakeholder communication
- Free communication because of their activities
- Value Driven
- Store Design = Consist with the mission
- High accountability positive and negative impacts
Business Model of Patagonia
- 3 Pillars of value = Inspire/ Best Product/ No harm
- Business model = Companies ability to create value between WTP and costs
- Customer = Long-term oriented/ Environmentally/ High income/ Outdoor
- Costs = High because of R&D/ Auditing and communication decreasing effects
- Best product = Durability/ Long Product life/ Image/ Emotional connection
- Very consistent strategy starting with the values, engaging to maintain it, collaborate with further institutions and communicate that to the stakeholders