6: Problems and difficulties in gaining access to the law Flashcards

1
Q

3 main problems:

A

Cost
Delays
Cultural/Social Differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cost:

A

People with limited financial means can’t afford to have their case heard in court due to high court fees and the need for legal representation. For example, legal representation in the Supreme Court can cost between $300 to $500 an hour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Recent change (Cost):

A

Roughly $35 million in increased funding for Victorian Legal Aid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Funding:

A

In May 2017, the government announced an increase of $34.7 million in funding for access to legal advice, support and information.
For example: Roughly $7 million in Legal Aid Grants
$1.27 million on translating services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Recommended Change (Cost):

A

Justice Fund to give financial assistance to plaintiffs with meritorious claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Meritorious claims:

A

The 2008 VLRC Civil Justice Review Report recommended that a Justice Fund be established to give financial assistance to plaintiffs with meritorious civil claims, and to protect them against adverse costs if they lost.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Delays:

A

The legal system is constantly delayed by lengthy pre-trial procedures and the fact courts have a backlog of cases to hear. The estimated delay of a criminal trial to be heard in the Supreme Court is 8 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Recent Change (Delay):

A

Removal of a time limit for jury deliberations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Jury deliberations:

A

Originally it was mandatory for jurors to take 6 hours in a criminal trial before a verdict was accepted. The Jury Directions Act 2015 was thus amended in 2017 so the 6 hour time frame was removed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Recommended Change (Delays):

A

Reforms to committal hearings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reforms to committal hearings:

A

A new test to commit an accused, introducing the word ‘would’ as opposed to ‘could convict’. Under this test if the Magistrate is of the opinion that there is a reasonable prospect a jury would convict an accused, the Magistrate is to commit the accused to trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social/Cultural Differences:

A

Language Barriers

Indigenous People

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Language Barriers:

A

People may not understand the law and how it affects them, and they may not realised they have a legal problem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Indigenous People:

A

Indigenous People are disadvantage by the legal system. Aborigines believe direct eye contact is disrespectful and avoid it by looking down or to the side, which can appear to be uninterested. Indigenous people tend to also be submissive to authority and very willing to respond to police requests, without realising the consequence of their actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Recent Change (Cultural)

A

Koori County Court Expansion in Mildura 2016

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Koori County Court:

A

First sentencing court for indigenous offenders. Aims to reduce cultural alienation and to encourage offenders to take responsibility for their behaviour by including them in a court process that is more culturally sensitive.

17
Q

Recommended Reform (Cultural):

A

Extending the Koori Court Model

18
Q

Extending the Koori Court Model:

A

The Koori Court is only a sentencing court for those that plead guilty, and the model can be extended to handle cases where the accused pleads not guilty.

19
Q

Indigenous Example:

A

R v Button 1999 - Aboriginal man convicted for rape by an all-white jury despite DNA evidence being inconclusive.