5) Collectivisation Flashcards
What were the ideological factors for collectivisation?
- peasant attitudes remained conventional. They weren’t producing for the good of the community but for their own profit.
- communists realised collectivisation was needed to encourage capitalist peasants.
When did mass collectivisation start? How did it start?
Mass collectivisation began in 1929 with the “liquidation of the kulaks”
What was the consequences of the liquidation of the kulaks?
-there was no definition of who was a kulak. Thousands of people were killed and sent to labour camps.
What was the response to collectivisation?
- the majority of peasants rebelled, choosing to destroy grain and livestock instead of surrendering it (100 million sheep and goats were destroyed 1929-33)
- same with machinery
When did Stalin have to halt collectivisation? Why?
- Although Stalin disregarded the human suffering (‘Moscow does not believe in tears’), he had to halt in March 1930.
- “dizzy with success” -> accused local party officials of being ‘over enthusiastic’ with collectivisation. This is another example of him being tactile.
- he allowed peasants to go back to their own lands (only 1/4 remained by August)
When did collectivisation resume? What did this result in?
Collectivisation resumed in 1931. This resulted in a famine greater than ever before. It was officially denied - western visitors were shown false images.
3-4 million people starved to death.
Consequences of collectivisation on rural areas:
- 10 million people were exiled, this is 10% of peasants from a single village!
- unrealistic targets for those survived
- rather than achieving communist spirit= anger and resentment.
- failed to raise agricultural production: those excited were often most hardworking, the harvest of 1933 was 9 million tonnes lower than 1926
- HOWEVER, it can be seen as successful as by 1941 all farms were collectivised. Stalin had achieved his aim.
What were the consequences of collectivisation on industry?
- more grain was exported (success)
- rose by 5 million tonnes 1928-31
What were the political consequences of collectivisation?
- Stalin’s authority increased. Instead of criticising Stalin, the chaos united the party behind him.
- fearing another civil war, party leaders were fiercely loyal.
What were the economic reasons for collectivisation?
- the winters of 1927-1929 poor harvests
- food requisitioning had to be used by the party to make up for the losses
- large farms would increase efficiency so fewer people would need to work on the farms. Extra manpower for industry.
- collectivisation also promised significant increase in production - more money so higher standard of living.