4. Collocational Meaning Flashcards

1
Q

Collocation was first used as a technical term by J______ F_______ in the 1950s.

London School of linguistics (SOAS)

A

John Firth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Collocation refers to the statistical likelihood of t— or more l—— i—- c–o——–, next to each other or a few words apart, in actual language use.

A

two or more lexical items co-occurring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How words combine with see [V]……
f____ c_________: to see a man/car/book

A

free combination: to see a man/car/book

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How words combine with see [V]……
w____ c__________: to see a film

A

weak collocation: to see a film

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How words combine with see [V]……
m______-s_______ c_________: to see a doctor

A

medium-strength collocation: to see a doctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How words combine with see [V]……
s_______ c_________: to see danger/reason/ the point

A

strong collocation: to see danger/reason/ the point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How words combine with see [V]……
f_____ p_____: not see the wood for the trees

A

fixed phrase: not see the wood for the trees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

C________, also a term from Firth, refers to the grammatical behaviour around linguistic items in actual language, i.e. the syntactic structures they take part

A

Colligation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

We chose to go there.
= S + choose + infinitive ✔
is ok, but
We selected to go there.
= S + select + infinitive ✕
is not.
There are c________ d________ between select and choose.

A

colligational differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

S______ p_______ refers to the positive or negative meaning associated with a word.

A

Semantic prosody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

This is a meaning beyond its dictionary definition, also signalled by its collocates.

A

Semantic prosody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

For example, cause [V] has a n_______ s_______ p______.

It collocates with:
problems
trouble
accident
subsidence
etc.

A

negative semantic prosody.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

C_______ signal different senses within a polysemous word.

Sense 1 – to do - assault, burglary, error

Sense 2 – to promise - money, funds, peacekeepers

Sense 3 – to dedicate - yourself, themselves, oneself

A

Collocates (Collocation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The structure for
Sense 1 [= to do] is to commit sth
(assault, burglary, error)

Sense 2 [= to promise] is to commit sth to sth
(money, funds, peacekeepers)

Sense 3 [= to dedicate] is to commit + reflexive pronoun (yourself, themselves, oneself)

A

Colligation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sense 1
commit sth (murder, crime)
– the semantic prosody is -ve

Sense 2
commit sth to sth (money, personnel e.g. to a cause)
– the semantic prosody is +ve

Sense 3
– commit yourself (+ve)

A

Sematic prosody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Three terms in phraseological studies

A

collocation

colligation

semantic prosody