3.6 Government Intervention Flashcards
Impacts of price capping
May stimulate attempts to lower costs, improving efficiency
In theory it leads to an improvement in allocative efficient and consumer welfare as point of output is moved closer to social optimum (p = mc)
Lowers monopolies supernormal profits
May lead some business to leave the market reducing competition
Reasons for government intervention in a merger
If merger would give new firm an overly significant market share and reduce choice for the consumers
Could lead to higher prices, reduction in quality, less choice for consumers
Lack of innovation in the market
if one dominant firm incurs supply issues who would consumers turn to for the product
What may government do instead of outright stopping a merger
Maximum price in market
Allow merger on condition that some assets are sold in certain areas
Regulation bodies monitor the quality of service being produced
Reasons for government intervention
Firm gains more market share
Lack of competition in the market
Allocative inefficiency
Unfair price competition
Purpose of CMA
Aims to prevent large companies from exploiting consumers with tactics such as inflated prices, dynamic efficiency, innovation
Will investigate merger if they suspect a substantial lessening of competition
Advantages of CMA activities
Lower prices for consumers
More choice
Firms cannot have monopoly power
More entrants into the market
Disadvantages of CMA activities
CMA could block merger that would of been beneficial to the country ( innovation)
Firms lose out on profits, may effect employees
Define merger
2 or more companies combining to create a new firm
Control of monopolies - price regulation
- Regulators force firms to charge a price below profit maximising using RPI - x
- allowing firms to increase price by inflation minus ‘x’ being expected improvement in efficiency
- RPI - X + K ‘k’ representing the amount of profit needed to cover investment
- this system gives firms incentive to be as efficient as possible as if they can lower costs by more than ‘x’ they can enjoy higher profits
- regulatory bodies struggle to set ‘x’ because of rapid movement in technology and asymmetric information
Control of monopolies - max pricing
Alternative price regulation method to RPI - x + k
- Max price could be set where p=mc ensuring monopolies are allocatively efficient
- however setting this price can be difficult as they do not know the exact allocatively efficient output.
- Max price however may limit dynamic efficiency as reduction in profits leads to lower investment
Control of monopolies -profit regulation
- Used to allow cost to be covered and give a fair rate of return
- Aims to encourage investment and prevents firms from setting high prices because they know government will take any additional profit
- allows new entrants to compete fairly against bigger competitors
- However this gives incentive for firms to spend to much on capital
- also very little incentive to be efficient
Control of monopolies - quality standards
Government stops firms producing poor quality goods exploiting consumers
E,g post offices + water must be supplied to all areas even if not profitable
Requires political will and understanding to do so
Control of monopolies - performance targets
Punctuality targets for trains, comparing performance of 1 region to the next
Government could set targets over: price, quality, choice, cost of production
Firms may try and meet targets without actually improving
Fines must be strong enough to encourage all firms to participate
How Does the promotion of small businesses occur
Government offers training and grants to new entrepreneurs and encourages small businesses through tax incentives or subsidies
Increases competition therefore reducing x inefficiency, increasing innovation
Aim of promoting small businesses and deregulation
To increase competition and contestability