3.3 electoral system analysis Flashcards
Why has FPTP survived for Westminster elections?
- outcomes it produces usually suit the interests of the two largest parties
- voters accept FPTP because it is familiar and easy to use
- little desire to change it for an untried system that may bring other problems
- the outcome of the May 2011 referendum demonstrated the lack of popular support for change
Why was AMS adopted for Scottish and Welsh devolved elections and for the Greater London Assembly?
- it would result in a broadly representative parliament, without involving such a radical change as STV
- pacified the other parties by providing an element of proportionality, but was acceptable to Labour because it retained local representation
- AMS in GLA = it would broadly reflect the views of the population of the capital while retaining an element of geographical representation
Why was STV adopted for the Northern Ireland Assembly?
- a highly proportional system
- likely to ensure the broadest possible representation of different parties
- important to avoid single-party domination because of conflicts
- ensures governments are power-sharing bodies drawn from both sides of the divide
What has been a big consequence of the adoption of proportional electoral systems?
coalition or minority governments have become much more common in Scotland, Wales and NI
What did the SNP have to do in order to pass legislation when it was a minority government
win the support of other parties
What are the main roles in the NI parliament?
the first minister and deputy first minister - nominated by the two largest parties, they are equal in status and share governmental responsibilities
What impact does different electoral systems of an party representation?
- adoption of fully or partly proportional systems have assisted smaller parties to varying extents
- in the 2015 general election the only third parties that did well were the SNP and the DUP that campaign in particular regions and their support is concentrated
- smaller parties have vested interest in reforming the electoral system but there is little realistic chance of achieving it
What impact does different electoral systems of an voter choice?
- AMS allows people two votes
- loads of choice by STV
- STV involves fewer wasted votes than FPTP, and offers greater potential to choose the winning candidate
- SV allows voters a first and a second preference vote
- all other systems provide more choice than FPTP, where voters only get one choice, although in a safe seat this vote has little chance in affecting the expected outcome