3.1.2 Individual differences exp. 2: Esyenck's Criminal Personality Evaluation Flashcards
1
Q
Dunlop et al. (2012)
A
- found that E and P were good predictors of delinquency
- however, all ptps were students and delinquency was measured by an assessment of minor offences in the previous 12 months
2
Q
Minor Offences
A
- only minor offences being studied means we don’t know if Eysenck’s theory can be generalised to other crimes
> questions usefulness
issue of age bias
can’t necessarily apply theory to adults if study used students
3
Q
Cochrane (1974)
A
- reviewed studies of prisoners and control groups who’d completed EPQ Questionnaires
4
Q
Cochrane (1974) findings and suggestions
A
- higher N but not higher E
- suggests extroversion isn’t the most important personality trait linked to crime but neuroticism is
> partially disputes Eysenck’s theory
5
Q
what is the biological basis of personality
A
suggests certain elements of personality do have a genetic basis:
- neuroticism = +0.52 correlation for MZ compared with +0.24 for DZ
- Extroversion = +0.51 correlation for MZ and +0.12 for DZ
6
Q
evaluation of genetic basis (reductionist)
A
- shows correlation between neuroticism and extroversion for MZ twins being not very high
- leaves room for non genetic explanation
- doesn’t take into account environmental factors
> reductionist
7
Q
validity and reliability issues
A
- takes into account nature and nurture
however: - participants are answering to the demands of the questionnaires
–> asked to select traits that they may not identify with or represent ‘reality’
e.g questionnaire only offers ‘yes’ or ‘no’ options and no ‘maybe’
–> did Eysenck really measure P,E and N successfully??
- personality isn’t always consistent therefore personality can be situational - unreliable data as it depends upon the situation someone is in
8
Q
social desirability
A
- Lie scales in the questionaire therefore data discarded
- set of questions such as:
‘are all of your habits good and desirable?’
> person who says yes is probably dishonest
9
Q
Heaven (1996) - reductionist
A
- suggests 3 dimensions is too broard and insetisive to capural a full understadning of how personlity develops and changes
- dimesnions shoud be less broard de.g focus on excitement seeking
10
Q
Heaven (1996) method and findings
A
- studied 282 14 year olds over a 2-year period
- measuring delinquency and E,P and self-esteem
- longitudinal predictor of later delinquency
- results showed the overall score and effect of P was very small