3>Theory of mind Flashcards

1
Q

(S&W) Relevance theory=

A

idea of ‘relevance’ central to human cognition & thus to human communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

relevance theory> 2 guiding principles>

A
  • cognitive principle of relevance
  • communicative principle of relevance
    ^idea that the former determines the latter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

cognitive principle of relevance=

A

human cognition tends to be geared to the maximisation of relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

communicative principle of relevance=

A

every ostensive stimulus conveys a presumption of its own optimal relevance (every time someone communicates with us, we assume there is something in it that is relevant to us)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

relevance & context>

A

relevance depends on the ‘positive cognitive effects’ (or changes) in how one sees the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

types of ‘positive cognitive effects’>

A

1>contextual implications
2>optimal relevance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

‘positive cognitive effect’> contextual implications>

A

> when we assume that an utterance is relevant, we do that by searching for what we know of the context
we often actively ‘create context’ to make sense of what others say

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

‘positive cognitive effect’> optimal relevance>

A

based on what the speaker has said & given, we presume what is said is OPTIMALLY RELEVANT; hearers strive to figure out what the optimally relevant meaning is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

explicature=

A

all missing contextual info needed to understand an utterance (<a cognitive phenomenon but in many cases overtly communicated)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

theory of mind=

A

anticipatory inference or simulation of what others are thinking/feeling/knowing is TOM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

relevance theory & TOM>

A

-desire to make addressee react a certain way (due to TOM) in response to our utterances/words will affect linguistic choices (relating to relevance thoery)
- young children & stream of consciousness style of communication (1 sided)> relevant to self not others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

intersubjectivity=

A

used in social science for the same perception shared between more than one conscious mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ways of expressing TOM linguistically>

A

> pragmatic markers: “well”; “isn’t it”
more complex expressions: “to be honest with you” “look” etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

intersubjectively marked language=

A

meta-pragmatics (road signs to our social thinking)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

pragmatic markers=

A

‘mirroring’ of the speaker’s mental process, commenting on what goes on in the speaker’s mind in response to the hearers projected reactions to the utterance (<thus are ‘intersubjective’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

examples of pragmatic markers=

A

‘well’= instructs hearer to interpet what is to come as in relation to what has been said
>also context dependent: in debate offers different opinion to last

17
Q

intersubjectively marked interaction=

A

humans tend to ascribe ‘intersubjectified’ meanings to existing forms (reflected in lang change & ontogeny)

18
Q

intersubjectified meanigns in relation to ‘literal ones’>

A

intersubjectified meanings ALWAYS devleop ‘on top of’ literal ones & normally express a surplus of sense that is ADDITIONAL to the actual content of what said

19
Q

intersubjectified interaction in autistic people>

A

intersubjectified interaction is more impeded in autistic speech than in neurotypical speech

20
Q

when do children develop the ability to master intersubjectified polysemies?>

A

around 3/4 corresponding to ‘critical period’ when they develop TOM

21
Q

IMMEDIATE forms of intersubjectivity>

A

awareness of potential reaction of specific person

22
Q

EXTENDED forms of intersubjectivity>

A

social cognition; the awareness of how ‘people’ would normally react to certain utterances in certain contexts

23
Q
A