3>Theory of mind Flashcards
(S&W) Relevance theory=
idea of ‘relevance’ central to human cognition & thus to human communication
relevance theory> 2 guiding principles>
- cognitive principle of relevance
- communicative principle of relevance
^idea that the former determines the latter
cognitive principle of relevance=
human cognition tends to be geared to the maximisation of relevance
communicative principle of relevance=
every ostensive stimulus conveys a presumption of its own optimal relevance (every time someone communicates with us, we assume there is something in it that is relevant to us)
relevance & context>
relevance depends on the ‘positive cognitive effects’ (or changes) in how one sees the world
types of ‘positive cognitive effects’>
1>contextual implications
2>optimal relevance
‘positive cognitive effect’> contextual implications>
> when we assume that an utterance is relevant, we do that by searching for what we know of the context
we often actively ‘create context’ to make sense of what others say
‘positive cognitive effect’> optimal relevance>
based on what the speaker has said & given, we presume what is said is OPTIMALLY RELEVANT; hearers strive to figure out what the optimally relevant meaning is
explicature=
all missing contextual info needed to understand an utterance (<a cognitive phenomenon but in many cases overtly communicated)
theory of mind=
anticipatory inference or simulation of what others are thinking/feeling/knowing is TOM
relevance theory & TOM>
-desire to make addressee react a certain way (due to TOM) in response to our utterances/words will affect linguistic choices (relating to relevance thoery)
- young children & stream of consciousness style of communication (1 sided)> relevant to self not others
intersubjectivity=
used in social science for the same perception shared between more than one conscious mind
ways of expressing TOM linguistically>
> pragmatic markers: “well”; “isn’t it”
more complex expressions: “to be honest with you” “look” etc
intersubjectively marked language=
meta-pragmatics (road signs to our social thinking)
pragmatic markers=
‘mirroring’ of the speaker’s mental process, commenting on what goes on in the speaker’s mind in response to the hearers projected reactions to the utterance (<thus are ‘intersubjective’)