2.2 Internal migration Flashcards
1
Q
How can the causes of internal migration be divided into?
A
- Macro level dimension
- Meso level dimension
- Micro level dimension
2
Q
The macro level dimension
A
- Highlights socio economic differences at the national scale
- Focusing on the core periphery concept
- Colonial era: migration was encouraged to labour intensive ventures => land was restricted access to locals. Cash based trade replaced bartering => forced people to move to earn a salary
- Post colonial: Exacerbated the move of people from periphery to core due to the investment taking place. Neglect to rural economy
3
Q
The meso level dimension
A
- Includes more detailed consideration of factors at origin and destination that influence people’s migration decisions
- Push pull factors e.g. Lee, Todaro and Stark
- Focus on perception rather than facts (not whether there are better wages but does the migrant think there will be better wages)
4
Q
The micro level dimension
A
- Specific circumstances of individual families and communities in terms of urban contact are crucial when deciding (especially when long distances are involved)
- Contacts frequently usually results in chain migration
5
Q
Political impacts of internal migration
A
- Lower political representation occurs when migration results in depopulation. All benefits go to the core => periphery remains as the detriment.
- In contrast where population is growing rapidly => political voice will become more important => able to influence government’s decision making process
- Change the ethnic composition of a region which can result in tension. e.g. In Niger Delta, most jobs are given t the major ethnic groups - Igbo, Yoruba, Hausa => other ethnic groups have high level of resentment => cause of the development of the armed force
6
Q
Environmental impacts of internal migration
A
- Expansion of urban area => swallow up farmland, forests, floodplains => increased pollution
- The carrying capacity might be exceeded => requires higher biocapacity => demand for resources such as water, coal, wood and the expansion of landfill sites
7
Q
Define remittanes
A
Money sent home to families by migrants working elsewhere
8
Q
Socio-economic impacts of internal migration
A
- Providing inputs such as remittances and newly acquire skills
- Promotes development in rural areas
- Narrows regional disparities and eventually makes migration unnecessary
- Uneven spread of the population and workforce
9
Q
Impact on population structures
A
- Population pyramids in rural areas show the loss of young adults
- May also show a distinct difference between number of males and females leaving. Males > females, though, in some areas female outmigration may be at a higher level (Ravenstein’s theory links)
10
Q
Middle income sector intra urban movements
A
- Inner city during childhood
- CBD during pre parenthood (rented room/home)
- Between inner suburbs and inner city during child rearing (starter home owned)
- Inner suburbs when having children (family home owned)
- Outer suburbs during grandparenthood (retirement bungalow owned)
11
Q
Low income sector intra urban movements
A
- Lives in inner city during childhood
- Spends most of their lives living in CBD
- Moves to inner suburbs/outer suburbs during grandparenthood
12
Q
Causes of intra urban movements
A
- Movements are closely related to stages in the family life cycle with the available housing stock being a major determinant of where people live at different stages in their lives
- Pre-parenthood: lives in CBD due to close commute to workplace as this is the time when they focuses on making a living
- Grandparenthood: lives in the suburbs to avoid pollution in the city
13
Q
Define counterurbanisation
A
Process of population decentralisation as people move from large urban areas to smaller urban settlements or rural areas
14
Q
Causes of counterurbanisation
A
- Better quality of life - less pollution, cleaner and more quiet
- Crime found in urban areas
- Want larger houses with cheaper prices
- Lack of working opportunities, hard to earn a job
15
Q
Effects of counterurbanisation
A
- Cities can shrink in size, and the demographic and economic of their areas can undergo significant change.
- Country villages are becoming increasingly suburbanised
- House prices can be pushed up locally as migrants sell expensive city properties and earn higher city wages
- Businesses are attracted to suburbanised villages causes the closures of village businesses due to incompetence