1.4 psychopathology Flashcards
four definitions of abnormality
deviation from social norms, statistical infrequency, failure to function adequately and deviation from ideal mental health
DSN, SI, FFA, DIMH
deviation from social norms
anyone who behaves differently from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community is classed as abnormal
social norms are in place for good reason - for example, impolite people are considered socially deviant as others find it hard to interact with them
other examples include not giving people personal space or being unhygienic in public
three disorders that can be identified with DSN
ASPD - antisocial personality disorder, where people may not understand how to behave towards others and can be considered reckless or manipulative
voyeurism - gaining sexual pleasure watching people when they are naked
paedophilia - disorder where there is a preference for sexual activity with children
two strengths of using DSN
+ we can clearly distinguish between normal and abnormal behaviour. for example if someone is talking to themselves loudly in public they are not adhering to social norms (politeness), and can be considered abnormal.
+ real life application, we can use this definition to diagnose certain disorders where the symptoms clearly state that the person’s behaviour deviate from social norms, eg. ASPD or schizophrenia when people may talk to themselves. application to the real world makes the definition authentic.
three weaknesses of using DSN
- in some cases, it can be beneficial to break social norms eg. the suffragettes broke social norms by getting involved in work that was traditionally male led and protesting an unorthodox cause, but this led to women gaining the right to vote.
- definition of social norms changes over time eg. homosexuality was classed as a mental illness in the ICD in 1990 but isn’t anymore. the definition cannot be judged across eras
- deviation is related to the context and degree, it could just be harmless eccentricity or something severely wrong eg. being naked on a beach vs a classroom
statistical infrequency
this definition suggests that abnormal behaviour is that which is statistically rare and lie at both extremes of a statistical infrequency graph (normal distribution/bell curve).
34% to either side = normal
2.5% to either side = abnormal
for example, the average persons IQ is 100. scores which are significantly higher or lower (eg. 130 or 70) are classed within the abnormal category, as they are rare/statistically infrequent.
two strengths of statistical infrequency
+ real life application. for example identifying someone with an IQ outside of the normal distribution could help with diagnosing disorders like intellectual disability disorder.
+ data is collected about a behaviour or characteristic. SI is objective, meaning it is unbiased as it is based on real statistics (you either fit in or you don’t)
two weaknesses of statistical infrequency
- this definition fails to account for behaviour that is statistically rare but desirable. eg. an IQ above the normal average would not be seen as abnormal, but highly regarded for intelligence.
- not everyone unusual benefits from a label - self-fulfilling prophecy means that SI could CAUSE someone to be abnormal. eg. having a low IQ could cause someone to believe that they are mentally inferior, and start acting like it too.
failure to function adequately
suggests that abnormal behaviour is when someone is unable to cope with everyday life. this may disrupt their ability to work or have satisfying interpersonal relationships.
eg. depression results in low moods that can lead to a person feeling unwilling to get up each morning, let alone go to work each day
failure to function adequately case study
rosenhan & seligman (1989) suggested you can identify whether someone is not coping with three rules:
extreme personal distress. this can be a sign of many psychological disorders like depression. some severe mental disorders cause sufferers no personal distress (being oblivious to their condition)
irrational or dangerous behaviour. this interferes with daily life/other people, which is maladaptive.
not conforming to standard interpersonal rules (eg. eye contact, personal space) which can be measured by GAF scale. general assessment of functioning, measuring how well individuals function in everyday life.
two strengths of using failure to function adequately
+ it recognises the patients thoughts and feelings, unlike DSN which measures abnormality based on social norms. this is a useful definition when assessing psychopathological behaviour of the individual
+ it is measurable, using the GAF scale - this means abnormality is defined relatively objectively
three weaknesses of using failure to function adequately
- cultural relativism. it depends on the culture to decide what functioning adequately actually looks like eg. sleeping during the day is called siesta in spain but may be a sign of depression in the UK
- this definition doesn’t specify how much distress an individual can feel to be classed as ‘normal’. there are times in a person’s life when it is normal and psychologically healthy to suffer from personal distress, like when a loved one dies. it would be abnormal not to feel distress under these circumstances, which contradicts the failure to function adequately definition
- abnormality doesn’t always stop someone from functioning. psychopaths can commit murders while still appearing normal. eg. harold shipman was a doctor who murdered 215 patients over 23 years and maintained a respectable appearance. no one knew he was a serial killer. this definition may not recognise inner distress as the individual may look normal
define deviation from ideal mental health
DIMH suggests that abnormality can be identified by looking at the opposite of normality.
jahoda (1958) suggested that physical illness is the absence of good health, and mental health can be defined in the same way.
thus, abnormal individuals do not meet the standard set of criteria for good mental health.
deviation from ideal mental health case study
jahoda (1958) suggested mental health can be defined with 6 criteria:
APPRES
- autonomy (A) - being independent, self-reliant, and able to make personal decisions for oneself
- perception of reality (P) - having an objective and realistic view of the world (no delusions/hallucinations)
- positive attitudes towards oneself (P) - high self esteem, self-respect, confidence and a positive self concept
- resistance to stress (R) - having effective coping mechanisms and being able to manage everyday stressful situations
- environmental mastery (E) - being competent in all aspects of life and the ability to meet the demands of any situation and the flexibility to adapt
- self-actualisation (S) - experience personal growth and development to reach ones full potential
two strengths of using deviation from ideal mental health
+ the definition is comprehensive (broad) so it includes all of the reasons one might seek help eg. an inaccurate perception of reality could mean that someone feels like a failure when they achieve an objectively good score on an exam.
+ encourages one to focus on achieving ideal mental health by following the set criteria. jahodas list allowa an individual to be aspirational in their outlook on life.
three weaknesses of using deviation from ideal mental health
- this list is demanding and unrealistic. it suggests that most of us are abnormal to some degree, because not many people meet all of the ideals. eg. not many people meet self-actualisation at every point in their life
- cultural relativism - depends on the culture to say which ones apply, eg. collectivist cultures like india or japan emphasise communal goals and regard autonomy as undesirable, unlike individualist cultures. therefore people from these collectivist cultures may be seen as abnormal using the criteria.
- many of the criteria jahoda mentions are subjective, vague and difficult to measure. for example, attempting to judge self-actualisation or resistance to stress is very individual based
phobias
an irrational fear of specific objects, places or situations causing excessive fear and anxiety
behavioural characteristics of a phobia
panic: the person might panic in the presence of the phobic object. this can be characterised by screaming, crying or running away, young kids may react by clinging/tantrum/freezing
avoidance: the person makes a conscious effort to avoid coming in contact with the phobic object in the first place. this can interfere with daily life
endurance: the person remains in presence of the phobic object but with high levels of anxiety. it can be unavoidable in cases like flying (it is an alternative to avoidance)
emotional characteristics of a phobia
fear: persistent, excessive and unreasonable distress might be felt in the presence of a phobic object. intense but for shorter periods than anxiety.
anxiety: a person will feel terror when encountering a phobic object, and be apprehensive about what is going to happen
unreasonable emotional responses: for example, a person with a phobia of spiders will have a huge reaction when seeing a harmless spider
cognitive characteristics of a phobia
selective attention: when a person encounters a phobic object, they will become fixated on it because of their irrational beliefs about the danger posed
irrational beliefs: the persons thoughts about their phobia do not make logical sense, and they will resist rational arguments that counter it. eg. people who are scared of flying will not listen to the fact that ‘flying is the safest form of transport’
cognitive distortions: perceptions of the phobic object are distorted and unpleasant, for example arachnophobes may see all spiders as dangerous and deadly, despite the fact there are no deadly spiders in the UK.
behavioural explanation of phobias
phobias are learned through experience through association.
howard mowrers (1960) two process model suggests that phobias are initiated by classical conditioning and then maintained by operant conditioning
classical conditioning
learning through association. a stimulus produces the same response as another stimulus because they have been constantly presented at the same time.
this could be how phobias develop, as the phobic object has been associated with another stimulus in the past for the sufferer.
operant conditioning
learning through reinforcement - whether it be positive or negative reinforcement/punishment.
reinforcement encourages repetition whilst behaviours that are punished will not be repeated.
a phobia can be maintained through avoidance behaviour, as avoiding the phobic object takes away fear and anxiety, and so is reinforcing (negative).
reinforcement
positive reinforcement: receiving a reward when a certain behaviour is performed, for example receiving praise from a teacher when you answer a question right. this makes it more likely that the behaviour is repeated
negative reinforcement: behaviour is carried out to avoid a negative consequence/punishment, eg. doing your homework to avoid getting shouted at
punishment
positive punishment: a behaviour leads to something unpleasant being added, making it less likely that the action will be repeated eg. a fine on a wrongly parked car
negative punishment: taking away something to prevent the behaviour from being repeated eg. taking away screen time for not doing chores
watson and raynor (1920) experiment
they conditioned an 11-month-old to have a fear of white rats.
initially the boy was keen to play with the rat. in the experiment, the psychologists struck a metal bar behind his head every time albert reached for the rat. this would make a loud noise that started albert and made him cry. eventually, albert cried every time he saw the rat, and this fear then generalised to other white fluffy objects.
watson and raynor (1920) findings
an infant is born with certain reflexes. the unconditioned stimulus of the loud bang produced the reflex of fear, crying and screaming as an unconditioned (natural) response.
the white rat was a neutral stimulus as it produced no reflexes (albert was unaffected). however, over time the white rat became associated with the unconditioned stimulus of a loud noise.
the white rat then became the conditioned stimulus, which then produced fear/phobia of the white rat as a conditioned response
albert associated the rat with fear. the conditioned response of fear was then generalised to all white or fluffy objects.
operant conditioning evidence
skinner (1938)
the ‘skinner box’ supported operant conditioning by proving in rats and pigeons that complex controlled responses like pressing bars and spinning a wheel could be learnt if the behaviour was rewarded
positive reinforcement was shown as the rat learned to press the lever to get more food
negative reinforcement was shown as the rat learned to press the lever to avoid getting shocked again
two strengths to the behavioural approach to explaining phobias
+ provides good explanations of how phobias can be acquired and maintained over time. this impacted the way behavioural therapies like flooding and systematic desensitisation were developed. it explains why patients need exposure to the phobic stimulus. once the patient stops practicing their avoidance behaviour, the behaviour is no longer reinforced and declines.
+ proven by scientific experimental evidence, for example watson and raynor (1920) or pavlov’s dogs (1927). ivan pavlov (1927) proved that dogs could be conditioned to salivate at just the sound of a bell.
neutral stimulus (bell) is paired with the unconditioned stimulus (food) that produces an unconditioned response (salivating) repeatedly. the neutral stimulus then becomes the conditioned stimulus (bell), which produces a conditioned response (salivating to the bell), as the dog now associates the bell to tasty food.
two weaknesses to the behavioural approach to explaining phobias
- many people who have a traumatic experience, such as a car accident, do not then go on to develop a phobia (e.g. of cars/driving), so classical conditioning does not explain how all phobias develop.
- there are many issues involved with the studies that support the two-process model. little albert’s study was extremely ethically flawed. he did not give his consent to take part in the study, meaning watson and raynor breached the ethical code of consent. he was also too young to understand the long term harm towards him. also, this study involved a child and pavlov’s involved dogs, and skinners used rats and pigeons - this means it cannot be generalised to adult human beings as they encounter less unconditioned stimuli than babies/animals.
behavioural treatments: systematic desensitisation
behavioural therapy developed by joseph wolpe (1958) to reduce phobias by using classical conditioning.
a person experiences fear and anxiety as a behavioural response to a phobic object. SD replaces this fear and anxiety with relaxed responses instead.
the central idea of SD is reciprocal inhibition, which is that it is impossible to experience two opposite emotions at the same time e.g. fear and relaxation.
therefore if the patient can learn to remain relaxed in the presence of their phobia, they can be cured (counter-conditioning).
two methods of SD
in vivo - the person experiences the phobia in real life
in vitro - the person imagines or visualises their phobia