1.4. Opportunism, fairness, and cooperation Flashcards
What’s a rational offer according to economic theory?
- people should offer 99-1
- people should accept 99-1
Economic theory vs. reality
- people are more generous (33% offer 50-50)
- most people reject anything worse than 80-20
2 ways to model behaviour
- Homo Oeconomicus
- Human being (behavioural view)
Homo Oeconomicus
figurative human being characterized by the infinite ability to make rational decisions
Rational behaviour assumptions
- Individuals have ranking of preferences that is complete and transitive, internally consistent and that has a maximum
- Concordet paradox: violation of transitivity (a>b, b>c-> a cannot < c)
- Individuals have full information about all the possible outcomes from all the possible choices
- All information available for free
- Individuals have the cognitive ability and time to calculate the optimal choice
Rational behaviour breakdown
- Individual maximizes utility under given constraints
- Make decision in isolation: not much room for reciprocity, trust and emotions => behave more opportunistically
Decision trees
a diagram that sets out the options connected with a decision and the outcomes and economic returns that may result
tool used by people with rational behaviour
Advantages of decision trees
- force the decision maker to consider all of the options and variables related to a decision
- an easy to follow diagram which allows for numerical considerations of risk and economic returns to be included
- approach encourages logical thinking and discussion amongst managers
- Are simple to understand and interpret.
- Have value even with little hard data. Important insights can be generated based on experts describing a situation (its alternatives, probabilities, and costs) and their preferences for outcomes.
- Can be combined with other decision techniques.
Disadvantages of decision trees
- accuracy of data used is doubtful. Estimated economic returns may only be accurate when experiences have been gained from similar decisions
- probabilities of events occurring are based on past data, but circumstances change
- aid decision making process but cannot replace the consideration of risk and the impact of qualitative factors on a decision - environment, attitude of workforce, approach to risk taken by managers
- expected values are average returns, assuming that the outcomes occur more than once. Allow a quantitative considerations of risks but do not eliminate those risks
- Assignment of probabilities and expected values prone to bias
Bounded rationality
the idea that in decision-making, rationality of individuals is limited by the information they have, the cognitive limitations of their minds, and the finite amount of time they have to make a decision.
Bounded rationality assumptions
- Limited information: info is costly and may not be retrievable
- Uncertainty: in most managerial decision, the probabilities are unknown (decision trees)
- Unclear priorities: cost, time, quality and scope of a project
- Cognitive limitation
- Time limitation
Behavioural view
- draws on psychology and economics to explore why people sometimes make irrational decisions, and why and how their behavior does not follow the predictions of economic models
- “Maximization” of well-being
- Preference are shaped also on emotions, trust and reciprocity
- It has social needs
- Cooperative behavior
- It may still be opportunistic
Satisficing
Decision makers can satisfice either by finding optimum solutions for a simplified world, or by finding satisfactory solutions for a more realistic world
Steps of satisficing
- Preliminary expectations
- Exploratory research
- Evaluation
- Expectations adjustment
- Decision
Homo Oeconomicus vs. Behavioural view
HO:
- Utility maximization
- Perfect or full information
- Limitless cognitive ability
- Opportunism
Behavioural:
- Utility satisfaction
- Ill-defined problems
- Bounded rationality
- Altruism, emotions