1.1 GROUP PERFORMANCE Flashcards

1
Q

potential group performance [PP]

A

likely outcome if all group members work as individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

actual group performance [AP]

A

actual productive outcome of group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

If AP>PP …?

A

group is facilitating/enhancing performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If PP>AP…?

A

group is hindering performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Steiner’s AP formula?

A

AP = PP - PL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a unitary task

A

all members do the same thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a divisible task

A

people do different sub-tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are 2 types of task goals?

A

maximisation [quant] and optimisation [qual]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the 3 types of tasks ?

A

additive, disjunctive, conjunctive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Additive Task

A

*Group performance = sum of individual performances
*Unitary + maximisation
*E.g. Brainstorming, pulling a rope
*group potential is higher than what the best members could achieve alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Disjunctive Task

A

*Operate at level of the highest performer
*Group succeeds if a single group member succeeds
*Can still benefit from larger group, greater group size should add to performance, inc likelihood of correct answer statistically?
o Nb. No direct link to group size and success though
*Eureka effect: correct/best decision once found is immediately recognised by all as correct
*e.g. problem-solving, complex calculations
*basically just a group working on something that one person could do
*group potential = best individual performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conjunctive Task

A

*Group members must be successful for the task to be completed
*E.g. mountain climbing team, keeping a secret, precision group work
*Team is only as fast as its slowest member
*Group potential decreases as group inc, more likely to have a weaker member
*Group potential = weakest individual performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

social inhibition

A

group process losses, how groups hinder productivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what 3 things may cause social inhibition/process losses?

A

losses in coordination, motivation, or cognitive restriction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the ringleman effect

A

each member adds less performance to the group than their prior, as group size increases, performance slows

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

name 4 faults with brainstorming

A

production blocking, topic fixation, social inhibition, social loafing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

production blocking

A

listening to others ideas uses mental energy needed to think of new ideas, reduces creative output

18
Q

topic fixation

A

ideas tend to cluster to a few categories

19
Q

social inhibition

A

ideas are held back for fear of what other people will think

20
Q

social loafing

A

as responsibility is distributed, apathy sets in and individuals are less accountable for production, individual contribution cannot be easily assessed/distinguished from overall group

21
Q

motivation losses may be due to which 3 things

A

social loafing, dispensability effect, sucker effect

22
Q

for which type of tasks is social loafing an issue?

A

additive tasks

23
Q

dispensability effect

A

people think their individual effort makes no real contribution to outcome

24
Q

sucker effect

A

due to others social loafing, initial hard workers will reduce their efforts to not be suckers

25
Q

what is cognitive restriction

A

trapped in certain ways of thinking, thought process effected by being in a group setting

26
Q

2 examples of cognitive restriction

A

group think + risky shift

27
Q

group think

A

people tend to conform with group decisions to avoid being an outcast, which may lead to errors in decision making

28
Q

in which instances does group think especially occur

A
  • group is cohesive
  • powerful leader signalled what decision they favoured
  • group regards itself as superior/elite
29
Q

what can be done to avoid groupthink?

A

oLeader must try to appear impartial
oAssign member as devil’s advocate to question assumptions/plans of group
oAny input should not be mocked or dismissed
oGroup should occasionally sub-divide before re-joining
oCall in outside experts to discuss decision

30
Q

risky shift

A

the tendency for decisions made in groups to be less conservative than the decision of the average group member

31
Q

which are riskier, groups or inidivduals?

A

groups

32
Q

what is a more accurate concept than risky shift

A

group polarisation

33
Q

group polarisation

A

groups more extreme than individual members views, any valenced opinion gets stronger in group setting

34
Q

what are two examples of group polarisation in the real world

A
  • racial prejudice inc in group discussion with like-minded people
  • gender – girls become more girly in all-girl groups, v/v for boys
35
Q

name 4 concepts involves in social facilitation

A

social competition, social compensation, kohler effect, cognitive stimulation

36
Q

what is social facilitation

A

how groups can enhance productivity

37
Q

social competition

A

o If individual contribution to group is assessed, competition, incentivisation
o Best when reward is tangible and members have equal abilities
o Actual group > potential group performance

38
Q

social compensation

A

o High performers work extra hard to overcome weaknesses of other members
o Overcompensation
o Occurs if stronger members believe goal of group is highly important; If not then strong may social loaf or sucker effect

39
Q

kohler effect

A

weaker members feel pressure to wor harder than they would individually, avoid blame for weak group performance. example: team rowing

40
Q

cognitive stimulation

A

o Opposite of inhibition
o Member may suggest something no other member has thought about
o Being in group could be more cog stimulating than being alone

41
Q

name 3 key people and what they are known for in group performance

A

Steiner - 3 dimensions of group task, actual group performance formula.
Stoner - risky shift.
Janis - Groupthink.