11. Common factor and integrative models Flashcards
Common factors are misleading
- Comparative therapy studies ignore therapist effects and thus overestimate treatment effects
- Lack structural equivalence
- Outcome differences often due to allegiance effect (researchers favourite)
What are integrative therapies?
Proliferation of therapies
- inadequacy of single therapy for all patients and problems
- opportunities to observe and experiment with various treatments
Technical eclecticism
Tools
- Improve ability of treatment selection
- Guided by research
- Actuarial rather than theoretical
- Not to be confused with syncretism (unsystematic blending of concepts, chaotic)
- Uses evidence-based technique for each problem
Theoretical integration
Ideas
- 2 or more theories integrated so that composite is more effective
- Blend both theory and technique
- eg Cognitive-Behavioural therapy
Multimodal therapy
Representative of technical eclecticism
- Psychological disturbance as a result of numerous influences (conflict/maladaptive habits/biological/external/…)
Multimodal therapy
Comprehensive assessment of patient’s deficits and excesses
BASIC ID
Behaviour
Affect
Sensation
Imagery
Cognition
Interpersonal relationships
Drugs/biology
Systematic treatment selection
Assumptions
- there is no treatment method or model that works well on all patients
- most treatment methods work well on some patients
Systematic treatment selection
Aim
Aims to identify the specific pattern of patient traits and states that best fit with a treatment strategy and a therapist’s particular relationship style.
Systematic treatment selections
Phases of assessment of Functional Impairment
- Functional Impairment Complexity (determines treatment frequency, duration and intensity)
- Patient’s coping style (select methods of intervention that rely on insight or beh. cog. training)
- Resistance ( state and trait properties, opposition to therapists efforts)
Motivational distress Yerkes and Dodson’s inverted-U law
Performance on a complex task increases up to an optimal point as arousal increases and performance decreases.
- If low arousal: arousal-induction to increase motivation
- If high arousal: arousal-reduction to concentrate on therapy process
Limitations of integrative models
- Lack of evidence
- Research mainly focused on specific factors
Future directions of integrative models
- Incorporate neuroscience and cognitive science into psychotherapy
- Therapies matched not only to clinical diagnosis but to transdiagnostic features
- Cognitive-behavioural-acceptance therapies will rival and perhaps overtake integrative.